13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Transplant Center Variability in Disparities for African-American Kidney Transplant Recipients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Disparities research has traditionally focused on patient-level variables to ascertain predominant risk factors driving differences in outcomes for African-American (AA) kidney transplant recipients. Our objectives were to determine the magnitude and impact of transplant center variability for graft outcome disparities.

          Material/Methods

          This was a retrospective cohort study analyzing 25 years of U.S. national transplant registry data at both the patient and center levels using univariate descriptive statistics and multivariable modeling.

          Results

          A total of 257,024 recipients from 191 centers were analyzed; AAs represented 31.1% of recipients. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, AAs had 42% higher risk of graft loss (aHR 1.42, 95% CI 1.39 to 1.45; p<0.001). Center variability for graft outcome disparities in AAs was significant (race*center interaction term p<0.05), with the aHRs ranging from 0.5 to 4.9; 46% of centers demonstrated a non-statistically significant disparity (aHR p>0.05) and 25% of centers had a large AA disparity (aHR >1.75). In a more recent transplant time period (2000–14), overall racial disparities decreased but center-level disparities increased in variability. Center-level factors significantly associated with increasing disparity included higher acute rejection rates, fewer transplants per year, longer length of stay, lower use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), and lower living donor rates.

          Conclusions

          There is evidence of significant center-level variability in graft outcome disparities for AA kidney recipients. Further, there appears to be a number of center-level factors associated with this variability, including acute rejection rates, CNI use, number of transplants per year, and, in recent years, low living donor rates.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Disparities in health care are driven by where minority patients seek care: examination of the hospital quality alliance measures.

          Racial/ethnic disparities in health care are well documented, but less is known about whether disparities occur within or between hospitals for specific inpatient processes of care. We assessed racial/ethnic disparities using the Hospital Quality Alliance Inpatient Quality of Care Indicators. We performed an observational study using patient-level data for acute myocardial infarction (5 care measures), congestive heart failure (2 measures), community-acquired pneumonia (2 measures), and patient counseling (4 measures). Data were obtained from 123 hospitals reporting to the University HealthSystem Consortium from the third quarter of 2002 to the first quarter of 2005. A total of 320,970 patients 18 years or older were eligible for at least 1 of the 13 measures. There were consistent unadjusted differences between minority and nonminority patients in the quality of care across 8 of 13 quality measures (from 4.63 and 4.55 percentage points for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for acute myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure [P<.01] to 14.58 percentage points for smoking cessation counseling for pneumonia [P=.02]). Disparities were most pronounced for counseling measures. In multivariate models adjusted for individual patient characteristics and hospital effect, the magnitude of the disparities decreased substantially, yet remained significant for 3 of the 4 counseling measures; acute myocardial infarction (unadjusted, 9.00 [P<.001]; adjusted, 3.82 [P<.01]), congestive heart failure (unadjusted, 8.45 [P=.02]; adjusted, 3.54 [P=.02]), and community-acquired pneumonia (unadjusted, 14.58 [P=.02]; adjusted, 4.96 [P=.01]). Disparities in clinical process of care measures are largely the result of differences in where minority and nonminority patients seek care. However, disparities in services requiring counseling exist within hospitals after controlling for site of care. Policies to reduce disparities should consider the underlying reasons for the disparities.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hospital-level racial disparities in acute myocardial infarction treatment and outcomes.

            Previous studies have documented racial disparities in treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) among Medicare beneficiaries. However, the extent to which unobserved differences between hospitals explains some of these differences is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine whether the observed racial treatment disparities for AMI narrow when analyses account for differences in where blacks and whites are hospitalized. Retrospective observational cohort study using Medicare claims and medical record review. This study included 130,709 white and 8286 black Medicare patients treated in 4690 hospitals in 50 US states for confirmed AMI in 1994 and 1995. Measures in this study were receipt of reperfusion, aspirin, and smoking cessation counseling during hospitalization; prescription of aspirin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and beta-blocker at hospital discharge; receipt of cardiac catheterization, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or bypass surgery (CABG) within 30 days of AMI; and 30-day and 1-year mortality. Within-hospital analyses narrowed or erased black-white disparities for medical treatments received during the acute hospitalization, widened black-white disparities for follow-up surgical treatments, and augmented the survival advantage among blacks. These findings indicate that, on average, blacks went to hospitals that had lower rates of evidence-based medical treatments, higher rates of cardiac procedures, and worse risk-adjusted mortality after AMI. Incorporating the hospital effect altered the findings of racial disparity analyses in AMI and explained more of the disparities than race. A policy of targeted hospital-level interventions may be required for success of national efforts to reduce disparities.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Interventions to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in health care.

              In 2005, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation created Finding Answers: Disparities Research for Change, a program to identify, evaluate, and disseminate interventions to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in the care and outcomes of patients with cardiovascular disease, depression, and diabetes. In this introductory paper, we present a conceptual model for interventions that aim to reduce disparities. With this model as a framework, we summarize the key findings from the six other papers in this supplement on cardiovascular disease, diabetes, depression, breast cancer, interventions using cultural leverage, and pay-for-performance and public reporting of performance measures. Based on these findings, we present global conclusions regarding the current state of health disparities interventions and make recommendations for future interventions to reduce disparities. Multifactorial, culturally tailored interventions that target different causes of disparities hold the most promise, but much more research is needed to investigate potential solutions and their implementation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Transplant
                Ann. Transplant
                Annals of Transplantation
                Annals of Transplantation
                International Scientific Literature, Inc.
                1425-9524
                2329-0358
                2018
                16 February 2018
                : 23
                : 119-128
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Transplant Surgery, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, U.S.A.
                [2 ]Department of Pharmacy Services, Ralph H Johnson Va Medical Center, Charleston, SC, U.S.A.
                [3 ]Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, U.S.A.
                [4 ]Department of Transplant Nephrology, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, U.S.A.
                [5 ]Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.
                [6 ]Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, U.S.A.
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: David J. Taber, e-mail: taberd@ 123456musc.edu
                [A]

                Study Design

                [B]

                Data Collection

                [C]

                Statistical Analysis

                [D]

                Data Interpretation

                [E]

                Manuscript Preparation

                [F]

                Literature Search

                [G]

                Funds Collection

                Article
                907226
                10.12659/AOT.907226
                6019128
                29449524
                4c47c126-ebf7-4937-aadc-dfcd82a7ed91
                © Ann Transplant, 2018

                This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International ( CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

                History
                : 21 September 2017
                : 07 November 2017
                Categories
                Original Paper

                african americans,graft survival,kidney transplantation,tertiary care centers

                Comments

                Comment on this article