21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Green Renal Replacement Therapy: Caring for the Environment

      Submit here before September 30, 2024

      About Blood Purification: 2.2 Impact Factor I 5.8 CiteScore I 0.782 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum Parathyroid Hormone Levels in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Moderate-to-Advanced CKD

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background/Aims: Elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH) is used to diagnose high turnover bone disease in chronic kidney disease (CKD). The diagnostic accuracy of PTH in kidney transplant recipients with CKD is unknown. Methods: We examined kidney transplant recipients with CKD stages 3 (n = 498) and 4 (n = 141) to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Kidney/Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative (K/DOQI)-recommended PTH levels in detecting elevated serum β-CrossLaps (CTX) or osteocalcin (OC) levels. We performed receiver-operator curve analyses to determine CKD stage-specific PTH levels that provide optimal diagnostic accuracy. Results: PTH below the lower limits of the K/DOQI ranges (35 and 70 pg/ml in CKD stages 3 and 4, respectively) showed sensitivity of >90% in diagnosing increases in biochemical markers. The upper limits (70 and 110 pg/ml), however, showed poor specificity. A specificity of >90% for detecting increased biochemical markers was seen with PTH of >140 and >240 pg/ml in CKD stages 3 and 4, respectively. Conclusion: Currently applied cutoffs for PTH in kidney transplant recipients with CKD stages 3 and 4 do not appear to adequately detect increased biochemical markers of bone turnover. Diagnostic uncertainty exists in patients with CKD stage 3 and PTH between 35 and 140 pg/ml, and CKD stage 4 and PTH between 70 and 240 pg/ml.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Proteinuria and other markers of chronic kidney disease: a position statement of the national kidney foundation (NKF) and the national institute of diabetes and digestive and kidney diseases (NIDDK).

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The spectrum of bone disease in end-stage renal failure--an evolving disorder.

            We have assessed the bone histology in 259 chronic dialysis patients, all of whom were in the same dialysis program. All patients had bone biopsies with quantitative histomorphometry, intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) measurements, basal and deferoxamine stimulated serum aluminum levels. Results demonstrate the increased incidence of the recently described aplastic bone lesion, particularly in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD). Aluminum-related bone disease is much less common than previously described, perhaps in relation to the declining use of aluminum as a phosphate binder. A different pattern of bone lesions is seen in PD as compared with hemodialysis (HD), with low turnover disorders comprising 66% of the lesions seen in PD and high turnover lesions accounting for 62% of the bone histologic findings in HD. The difference in these patterns may relate to alterations in PTH levels, as mean PTH levels in HD patients were 2-1/2 times the levels found in PD patients (P < 0.0005), while older age, higher prevalence of diabetes and a shorter duration of dialysis may also have contributed to the findings in the PD patients. We suggest that PD, perhaps by maintaining calcium at higher levels, may more effectively suppress the parathyroid gland.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: implication for the care of CKD patients.

              The National Kidney Foundation/Kidney-Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative guidelines recommend to maintain the serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration between 150 and 300 ng/l in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 patients. As these limits were derived from studies that used the Allegro intact PTH assay, we aimed to evaluate whether they were applicable to other PTH assays. We compared the PTH concentrations measured with 15 commercial immunoassays in 47 serum pools from dialysis patients, using the Allegro intact PTH assay as the reference. We also evaluated the recovery of graded amounts of synthetic 1-84 and 7-84 PTH added separately to a serum pool. Although the assays were highly correlated, the concentrations differed from one assay to another. The median bias between the tested assays and the Allegro intact PTH assay ranged from -44.9 to 123.0%. When the PTH concentrations were 150 or 300 ng/l with the Allegro intact PTH assay, they ranged with other assays from 83 to 323 ng/l and from 160 to 638 ng/l, respectively. The tested assays recognized 7-84 PTH with various cross-reactivities, whereas a given amount of 1-84 PTH was recovered differently by these assays. We found important inter-method variability in PTH results owing to both antibody specificity and standardization reasons. The unacceptable consequence is that opposite therapeutic attitudes may be reached in a single patient depending on the PTH assay used. We propose to use assay-specific decision limits for CKD patients, or to apply a correcting factor to the PTH results obtained with a given assay.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                NEC
                Nephron Clin Pract
                10.1159/issn.1660-2110
                Nephron Clinical Practice
                S. Karger AG
                1660-2110
                2011
                May 2011
                08 December 2010
                : 118
                : 2
                : c78-c85
                Affiliations
                aDivision of Nephrology, Salem Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salem, and bDepartment of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va., USA; Institutes of cPathophysiology and dBehavioral Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; eHarold Simmons Center for Chronic Disease Research and Epidemiology, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, Calif., USA; fDepartment of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; gUniversity of Toronto, University Health Network, Division of Nephrology, Toronto, Ont., Canada; h1st Department of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University, iDepartment of Nephrology, Szent Imre Hospital, Budapest, Hungary; jDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Que., Canada
                Author notes
                *Csaba P. Kovesdy, MD, FASN, Division of Nephrology, Salem VA Medical Center, 1970 Roanoke Blvd, Salem, VA 24153 (USA), Tel. +1 540 982 2463, Fax +1 540 224 1963, E-Mail csaba.kovesdy@va.gov
                Article
                320318 Nephron Clin Pract 2011;118:c78–c85
                10.1159/000320318
                21150215
                2a16c058-d8ae-42ef-a649-31fc098f87bf
                © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 09 June 2010
                : 10 August 2010
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 4, Pages: 8
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Cardiovascular Medicine,Nephrology
                High turnover bone disease,Parathyroid hormone,Kidney transplant,Chronic kidney disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article