6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Predicting effects of multiple interacting global change drivers across trophic levels

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Global change encompasses many co-occurring anthropogenic drivers, which can act synergistically or antagonistically on ecological systems. Predicting how different global change drivers simultaneously contribute to observed biodiversity change is a key challenge for ecology and conservation. However, we lack the mechanistic understanding of how multiple global change drivers influence the vital rates of multiple interacting species. We propose that reaction norms, the relationships between a driver and vital rates like growth, mortality, and consumption, provide insights to the underlying mechanisms of community responses to multiple drivers. Understanding how multiple drivers interact to affect demographic rates using a reaction-norm perspective can improve our ability to make predictions of interactions at higher levels of organization—that is, community and food web. Building on the framework of consumer−resource interactions and widely studied thermal performance curves, we illustrate how joint driver impacts can be scaled up from the population to the community level. A simple proof-of-concept model demonstrates how reaction norms of vital rates predict the prevalence of driver interactions at the community level. A literature search suggests that our proposed approach is not yet used in multiple driver research. We outline how realistic response surfaces (i.e., multidimensional reaction norms) can be inferred by parametric and nonparametric approaches. Response surfaces have the potential to strengthen our understanding of how multiple drivers affect communities as well as improve our ability to predict when interactive effects emerge, two of the major challenges of ecology today.

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Synergies among extinction drivers under global change.

          If habitat destruction or overexploitation of populations is severe, species loss can occur directly and abruptly. Yet the final descent to extinction is often driven by synergistic processes (amplifying feedbacks) that can be disconnected from the original cause of decline. We review recent observational, experimental and meta-analytic work which together show that owing to interacting and self-reinforcing processes, estimates of extinction risk for most species are more severe than previously recognised. As such, conservation actions which only target single-threat drivers risk being inadequate because of the cascading effects caused by unmanaged synergies. Future work should focus on how climate change will interact with and accelerate ongoing threats to biodiversity, such as habitat degradation, overexploitation and invasive species.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Growth of Bacterial Cultures

            J MONOD (1949)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Systematic variation in the temperature dependence of physiological and ecological traits.

              To understand the effects of temperature on biological systems, we compile, organize, and analyze a database of 1,072 thermal responses for microbes, plants, and animals. The unprecedented diversity of traits (n = 112), species (n = 309), body sizes (15 orders of magnitude), and habitats (all major biomes) in our database allows us to quantify novel features of the temperature response of biological traits. In particular, analysis of the rising component of within-species (intraspecific) responses reveals that 87% are fit well by the Boltzmann-Arrhenius model. The mean activation energy for these rises is 0.66 ± 0.05 eV, similar to the reported across-species (interspecific) value of 0.65 eV. However, systematic variation in the distribution of rise activation energies is evident, including previously unrecognized right skewness around a median of 0.55 eV. This skewness exists across levels of organization, taxa, trophic groups, and habitats, and it is partially explained by prey having increased trait performance at lower temperatures relative to predators, suggesting a thermal version of the life-dinner principle-stronger selection on running for your life than running for your dinner. For unimodal responses, habitat (marine, freshwater, and terrestrial) largely explains the mean temperature at which trait values are optimal but not variation around the mean. The distribution of activation energies for trait falls has a mean of 1.15 ± 0.39 eV (significantly higher than rises) and is also right-skewed. Our results highlight generalities and deviations in the thermal response of biological traits and help to provide a basis to predict better how biological systems, from cells to communities, respond to temperature change.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                9888746
                Glob Chang Biol
                Glob Chang Biol
                Global change biology
                1354-1013
                1365-2486
                02 December 2022
                02 December 2022
                05 January 2023
                01 March 2023
                : 29
                : 5
                : 1223-1238
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
                [2 ]Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
                [3 ]Sorbonne Université, CNRS, IRD, INRAE, Université Paris Est Créteil, Université Paris Cité, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris (iEES-Paris), Paris, France
                [4 ]Department of Ecological Dynamics, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany
                [5 ]Department of Aquatic Ecology, Eawag, Dübendorf, Switzerland
                [6 ]Theoretical and Experimental Ecology Station, CNRS, Moulis, France
                [7 ]Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution de Montpellier (ISEM), Université de Montpellier, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France
                [8 ]Namur Institute for Complex Systems (naXys), Institute of Life, Earth, and Environment (ILEE), Research Unit in Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Frank Pennekamp, Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. frank.pennekamp@ 123456ieu.uzh.ch
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1947-8971
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9669-5227
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3072-0095
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4561-0163
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6676-7592
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8862-718X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0273-0483
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4060-973X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0679-1045
                Article
                EMS159328
                10.1111/gcb.16548
                7614140
                36461630
                49cc38a0-9fae-4f68-8d52-e5623e1794cc

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                consumer−resource model,global change,multiple stressors,reaction norms,species interactions,thermal performance curves

                Comments

                Comment on this article