Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application, and Selection Criteria Adaptations, in Times of COVID-19 : A Survey Study

      review-article
      , MD 1 , 2 , , BS 3 , , MD, FAOA 4 , , MD, FAOA 5 , , MD, FAOA 5
      JBJS Open Access
      Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Background:

          Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, medical education and residency application have faced unprecedented changes. This has forced residency directors to alter their selection criteria in the absence of away rotations and the implementation of nationwide virtual interviews.

          Purpose:

          The purpose of this study was to assess how residency directors have adapted their selection criteria in light of this unique application cycle and to look at the effect, and future, of the different changes.

          Methods:

          A 16-question online survey was disseminated to 31 residency programs gathering data about new opportunities offered this cycle, changes to selection criteria, match outcomes, as well as the number of applicants to their program.

          Results:

          Twenty-nine respondents completed the survey (94% response rate). There was a significant rise in the number of applications received by programs this cycle (p < 0.05). Programs have unanimously altered their selection processes. The biggest changes in selection criteria were putting more weight into communication from mentors, emails from the applicants, home applicant status, and virtual information session attendance. Some programs used additional application requirements beyond Electronic Residency Application Service, which were often uncompleted, and cut the number of eligible applications by up to 46%. Among the new opportunities offered this cycle, virtual information sessions and social media platforms seem to be the most commonly offered and are anticipated to grow.

          Discussion and Conclusion:

          Orthopaedic surgery residency continues to become more competitive with a significant rise in the number of applications during the COVID-19 pandemic. Amid this increasingly demanding virtual application cycle, a holistic application review was more challenging. More weight was put that cycle into communication from faculty mentors, emails from the applicants, home applicant status, and virtual information session attendance. Supplementary applications and virtual informative opportunities are likely to last and change the future of the orthopaedic surgery residency application process.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Cost of Getting Into Orthopedic Residency: Analysis of Applicant Demographics, Expenditures, and the Value of Away Rotations

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Orthopaedic Surgery Residency: Perspectives of Applicants and Program Directors on Medical Student Away Rotations.

            Senior medical students frequently rotate at orthopaedic residency programs away from their home medical schools. However, to our knowledge, the perspective of program directors (PDs) and applicants on the value, objectives, and costs of these rotations has not been studied.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Matching in Orthopaedic Surgery.

              In 2016, 1,137 fourth year medical students submitted applications for orthopedic surgery residency positions. Students applied to an average of 79 programs, resulting in in a total of 89,846 applications being submitted for 727 first year residency positions. This ratio of 124 applications per position is two SDs above the mean relative to other medical specialties. The average applicant for orthopaedic surgery residency attends 2.4 away rotations, as attending 2 away rotations increases an applicant's odds of matching, and submits 83 applications. This excessive number of applications overburdens programs, subjects applicants to considerable costs, and diminishes the quality of fit between interviewees and programs. Eighty-three percent of program directors use step 1 United States Medical Licensing Examination scores as a screening tool to decrease the number of applications necessary for review. The average matched applicant attended 11.5 interviews, and Step 1 scores, research productivity, and Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) status can be used to predict the number of applications necessary to obtain 12 interviews. AOA membership has the strongest influence on interview yield. Applicants report spending an average of approximately $7,000 on the interview process, and 72% borrow money to cover these costs. Post-interview contact, although forbidden by the National Resident Matching Program , has been reported by 60% to 64% of applicants.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JB JS Open Access
                JB JS Open Access
                JBJSOA
                JBJS Open Access
                Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
                2472-7245
                Apr-Jun 2022
                21 April 2022
                : 7
                : 2
                : e21.00145
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
                [2 ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Fairfax, Virginia
                [3 ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
                [4 ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York
                [5 ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
                Author notes
                E-mail address for A.A. Ayer: tabsaiyer@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6948-2269
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8315-654X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-1179
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6564-2707
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5070-2770
                Article
                JBJSOA-D-21-00145 00005
                10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00145
                9484813
                48676ea1-d2be-405d-8fcb-5df9440b95ac
                Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                Categories
                0020
                0190
                AOA Critical Issues in Education
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                Comments

                Comment on this article