There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
<p xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" class="first" dir="auto"
id="d13948398e249">Oral diseases are a major global public health problem affecting
over 3·5 billion
people. However, dentistry has so far been unable to tackle this problem. A fundamentally
different approach is now needed. In this second of two papers in a Series on oral
health, we present a critique of dentistry, highlighting its key limitations and the
urgent need for system reform. In high-income countries, the current treatment-dominated,
increasingly high-technology, interventionist, and specialised approach is not tackling
the underlying causes of disease and is not addressing inequalities in oral health.
In low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), the limitations of so-called westernised
dentistry are at their most acute; dentistry is often unavailable, unaffordable, and
inappropriate for the majority of these populations, but particularly the rural poor.
Rather than being isolated and separated from the mainstream health-care system, dentistry
needs to be more integrated, in particular with primary care services. The global
drive for universal health coverage provides an ideal opportunity for this integration.
Dental care systems should focus more on promoting and maintaining oral health and
achieving greater oral health equity. Sugar, alcohol, and tobacco consumption, and
their underlying social and commercial determinants, are common risk factors shared
with a range of other non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Coherent and comprehensive
regulation and legislation are needed to tackle these shared risk factors. In this
Series paper, we focus on the need to reduce sugar consumption and describe how this
can be achieved through the adoption of a range of upstream policies designed to combat
the corporate strategies used by the global sugar industry to promote sugar consumption
and profits. At present, the sugar industry is influencing dental research, oral health
policy, and professional organisations through its well developed corporate strategies.
The development of clearer and more transparent conflict of interest policies and
procedures to limit and clarify the influence of the sugar industry on research, policy,
and practice is needed. Combating the commercial determinants of oral diseases and
other NCDs should be a major policy priority.
</p>
Oral diseases are among the most prevalent diseases globally and have serious health and economic burdens, greatly reducing quality of life for those affected. The most prevalent and consequential oral diseases globally are dental caries (tooth decay), periodontal disease, tooth loss, and cancers of the lips and oral cavity. In this first of two papers in a Series on oral health, we describe the scope of the global oral disease epidemic, its origins in terms of social and commercial determinants, and its costs in terms of population wellbeing and societal impact. Although oral diseases are largely preventable, they persist with high prevalence, reflecting widespread social and economic inequalities and inadequate funding for prevention and treatment, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). As with most non-communicable diseases (NCDs), oral conditions are chronic and strongly socially patterned. Children living in poverty, socially marginalised groups, and older people are the most affected by oral diseases, and have poor access to dental care. In many LMICs, oral diseases remain largely untreated because the treatment costs exceed available resources. The personal consequences of chronic untreated oral diseases are often severe and can include unremitting pain, sepsis, reduced quality of life, lost school days, disruption to family life, and decreased work productivity. The costs of treating oral diseases impose large economic burdens to families and health-care systems. Oral diseases are undoubtedly a global public health problem, with particular concern over their rising prevalence in many LMICs linked to wider social, economic, and commercial changes. By describing the extent and consequences of oral diseases, their social and commercial determinants, and their ongoing neglect in global health policy, we aim to highlight the urgent need to address oral diseases among other NCDs as a global health priority.
The Global Burden of Disease 2015 study aims to use all available data of sufficient quality to generate reliable and valid prevalence, incidence, and disability-adjusted life year (DALY) estimates of oral conditions for the period of 1990 to 2015. Since death as a direct result of oral diseases is rare, DALY estimates were based on years lived with disability, which are estimated only on those persons with unmet need for dental care. We used our data to assess progress toward the Federation Dental International, World Health Organization, and International Association for Dental Research’s oral health goals of reducing the level of oral diseases and minimizing their impact by 2020. Oral health has not improved in the last 25 y, and oral conditions remained a major public health challenge all over the world in 2015. Due to demographic changes, including population growth and aging, the cumulative burden of oral conditions dramatically increased between 1990 and 2015. The number of people with untreated oral conditions rose from 2.5 billion in 1990 to 3.5 billion in 2015, with a 64% increase in DALYs due to oral conditions throughout the world. Clearly, oral diseases are highly prevalent in the globe, posing a very serious public health challenge to policy makers. Greater efforts and potentially different approaches are needed if the oral health goal of reducing the level of oral diseases and minimizing their impact is to be achieved by 2020. Despite some challenges with current measurement methodologies for oral diseases, measurable specific oral health goals should be developed to advance global public health.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.