27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Intention to adhere to test, trace, and isolate during the COVID‐19 pandemic (the COVID‐19 Rapid Survey of Adherence to Interventions and Responses study)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          (1) To investigate factors associated with intention to self‐isolate, request a test, and share details of close contacts when required. (2) To determine whether associations were stronger during periods when less stringent national COVID‐19 restrictions were in place.

          Design

          Series of cross‐sectional nationally representative surveys. We selected survey waves where different national restrictions were in place in England (first lockdown, summer release, second lockdown, third lockdown).

          Methods

          We investigated whether psychological factors and increased out‐of‐home activity in the last week were associated with intention to self‐isolate and request a test if you were to develop COVID‐19 symptoms, and intention to share details of contacts if you were to test positive. We also investigated whether the strength of associations differed by timepoint in the pandemic.

          Results

          Intention to self‐isolate, request a test and share details of contacts were associated with greater perceived risk of COVID‐19 to people in the United Kingdom, knowing that COVID‐19 transmission can be asymptomatic, and agreeing that personal behaviour has an impact on COVID‐19 transmission. There were few differences in strength of associations by timepoint suggesting these effects are broadly stable over time.

          Conclusions

          Psychological factors were associated with intention to adhere to key components of the contact tracing system; there was no evidence for an association with increased out‐of‐home activity. Messages that increase knowledge that COVID‐19 can be transmitted even if someone does not have symptoms and that an individual’s actions can contribute to the spread of the virus may promote engagement with the test, trace, and isolate system.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions

          Background Improving the design and implementation of evidence-based practice depends on successful behaviour change interventions. This requires an appropriate method for characterising interventions and linking them to an analysis of the targeted behaviour. There exists a plethora of frameworks of behaviour change interventions, but it is not clear how well they serve this purpose. This paper evaluates these frameworks, and develops and evaluates a new framework aimed at overcoming their limitations. Methods A systematic search of electronic databases and consultation with behaviour change experts were used to identify frameworks of behaviour change interventions. These were evaluated according to three criteria: comprehensiveness, coherence, and a clear link to an overarching model of behaviour. A new framework was developed to meet these criteria. The reliability with which it could be applied was examined in two domains of behaviour change: tobacco control and obesity. Results Nineteen frameworks were identified covering nine intervention functions and seven policy categories that could enable those interventions. None of the frameworks reviewed covered the full range of intervention functions or policies, and only a minority met the criteria of coherence or linkage to a model of behaviour. At the centre of a proposed new framework is a 'behaviour system' involving three essential conditions: capability, opportunity, and motivation (what we term the 'COM-B system'). This forms the hub of a 'behaviour change wheel' (BCW) around which are positioned the nine intervention functions aimed at addressing deficits in one or more of these conditions; around this are placed seven categories of policy that could enable those interventions to occur. The BCW was used reliably to characterise interventions within the English Department of Health's 2010 tobacco control strategy and the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence's guidance on reducing obesity. Conclusions Interventions and policies to change behaviour can be usefully characterised by means of a BCW comprising: a 'behaviour system' at the hub, encircled by intervention functions and then by policy categories. Research is needed to establish how far the BCW can lead to more efficient design of effective interventions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              COVID-19 vaccination intention in the UK: results from the COVID-19 vaccination acceptability study (CoVAccS), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey

              To investigate factors associated with intention to be vaccinated against COVID-19 we conducted a cross-sectional survey of 1,500 UK adults, recruited from an existing online research panel. Data were collected between 14th and 17th July 2020. We used linear regression analyses to investigate associations between intention to be vaccinated for COVID-19 “when a vaccine becomes available to you” and sociodemographic factors, previous influenza vaccination, general vaccine attitudes and beliefs, attitudes and beliefs about COVID-19, and attitudes and beliefs about a COVID-19 vaccination. 64% of participants reported being very likely to be vaccinated against COVID-19, 27% were unsure, and 9% reported being very unlikely to be vaccinated. Personal and clinical characteristics, previous influenza vaccination, general vaccination beliefs, and beliefs and attitudes about COVID-19 and a COVID-19 vaccination explained 76% of the variance in vaccination intention. Intention to be vaccinated was associated with more positive general COVID-19 vaccination beliefs and attitudes, weaker beliefs that the vaccination would cause side effects or be unsafe, greater perceived information sufficiency to make an informed decision about COVID-19 vaccination, greater perceived risk of COVID-19 to others (but not risk to oneself), older age, and having been vaccinated for influenza last winter (2019/20). Despite uncertainty around the details of a COVID-19 vaccination, most participants reported intending to be vaccinated for COVID-19. Actual uptake may be lower. Vaccination intention reflects general vaccine beliefs and attitudes. Campaigns and messaging about a COVID-19 vaccination could consider emphasizing the risk of COVID-19 to others and necessity for everyone to be vaccinated.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Richard.amlot@phe.gov.uk
                Journal
                Br J Health Psychol
                Br J Health Psychol
                10.1111/(ISSN)2044-8287
                BJHP
                British Journal of Health Psychology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1359-107X
                2044-8287
                30 November 2021
                September 2022
                : 27
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1111/bjhp.v27.3 )
                : 1100-1118
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King’s College London UK
                [ 2 ] NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response London UK
                [ 3 ] Institute of Health Informatics University College London UK
                [ 4 ] Behavioural Science and Insights Unit UK Health Security Agency Salisbury UK
                [ 5 ] Academic Department of Military Mental Health King’s Centre for Military Health Research London UK
                [ 6 ] Centre for Behaviour Change University College London UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence should be addressed to Richard Amlȏt, Head of Behavioural Science in the Behavioural Science and Insights Unit at the UK Health Security Agency. Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JG, UK (email: Richard.amlot@ 123456phe.gov.uk ).

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1277-2564
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6200-8804
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3481-6588
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5792-2925
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0063-6378
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4440-0570
                Article
                BJHP12576
                10.1111/bjhp.12576
                9542361
                34846088
                474e2632-186c-4100-9e2c-9513f977232e
                © 2021 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 29 October 2021
                : 20 September 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Pages: 1118, Words: 9353
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute for Health Research , doi 10.13039/501100000272;
                Funded by: Department of Health and Social Care , doi 10.13039/501100000276;
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.0 mode:remove_FC converted:07.10.2022

                behaviour,contact tracing,covid‐19,predictors,psychological factors

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content144

                Cited by9

                Most referenced authors534