Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Analysis of the Factors Related to the Effectiveness of Transcranial Current Stimulation in Upper Limb Motor Function Recovery after Stroke: a Systematic Review.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Transcranial direct current stimulation is one of the non-invasive techniques whose main mechanism of action is based on its modulation of cortical excitability. The objective of this study is to analyze the variables (i.e, demographics, clinicals, stimulation parameters) that could influence into the responses during rehabilitation of the upper extremity in patients with stroke. Our systematic review has been performed by searching full-text articles published from January 2008 to December 2018 in Embase, Medline, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases. Studies with adult patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke at any stage of evolution were included. We compared interventions with any type of transcranial direct current stimulation (anodal, cathodal or bihemispheric, also known as dual) regarding improvement of upper extremity motor function. We included 14 studies with 368 patients, of whom almost 89% have ischemic etiology and more than half are males. Most patients were considered subacute or chronic, while only two studies were selected with patients in the acute phase. Different methods of using transcranial direct current stimulation with several complementary therapies were identified, such as virtual reality, robot therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physiotherapy, Constraint Induced Movement Therapy or Peripheral Nerve Stimulation. In conclusion, there is not significant evidence due to heterogeneity of clinical data and therapies. Clinical studies with greater number of participants and protocols standardized could outline this assessment in future studies.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Med Syst
          Journal of medical systems
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          1573-689X
          0148-5598
          Feb 08 2019
          : 43
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Departament of Surgery, University of Salamanca, Alfonso X el Sabio s/n, 37007, Salamanca, Spain. marianrhb@gmail.com.
          [2 ] Official College of Physiotherapists, Departament of Physiotherapy, Alicante, Spain.
          [3 ] Departament of Neurosurgery, Universitary Hospital of Salamanca, Paseo de San Vicente, 58-182, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
          [4 ] Departament of Surgery, University of Salamanca, Alfonso X el Sabio s/n, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
          [5 ] VisualMed Systems Group, University of Salamanca, Patio Escuelas 1, 37008, Salamanca, Spain.
          Article
          10.1007/s10916-019-1193-9
          10.1007/s10916-019-1193-9
          30737601
          472a6966-7b0c-419f-9184-ac6eccf3c952
          History

          Transcranial direct current stimulation,Upper extremity,Stroke,Systematic review,Rehabilitation

          Comments

          Comment on this article