2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      May Dual Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhance the Efficacy of Robot-Assisted Therapy for Promoting Upper Limb Recovery in Chronic Stroke?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To assess whether dual transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may enhance the efficacy of exoskeleton robotic training on upper limb motor functions in patients with chronic stroke.

          Methods

          A prospective, bi-center, double-blind, randomized clinical trial study was performed. Patients with moderate-to-severe stroke (according to The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) were randomly assigned to receive dual or sham tDCS immediately before robotic therapy (10 sessions, 2 weeks). The primary outcome was the Fugl–Meyer for Upper Extremity, assessed before, after, and at the 12-week follow-up. Neurophysiological evaluation of corticospinal projections to upper limb muscles was performed by recording motor evoked potentials (MEPs). ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT03026712.

          Results

          Two hundred and sixty individuals were tested for eligibility, of which 80 were enrolled and agreed to participate. Excluding 14 dropouts, 66 patients were randomly assigned into the 2 groups. Results showed that chronic patients were stable before treatment and significantly improved after that. The records within subject improvements were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, a post-hoc analysis subdividing patients in 2 subgroups based on the presence or absence of MEPs at the baseline showed a significantly higher effect of real tDCS in patients without MEPs when compared to patients with MEPs ( F = 4.6, P = .007).

          Conclusion

          The adjunction of dual tDCS to robotic arm training did not further enhance recovery in the treated sample of patients with chronic stroke. However, a significant improvement in the subgroup of patients with a severe corticospinal dysfunction (as suggested by the absence of MEPs) suggests that they could benefit from such a treatment combination.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity.

            We undertook this investigation to determine the interrater reliability of manual tests of elbow flexor muscle spasticity graded on a modified Ashworth scale. We each independently graded the elbow flexor muscle spasticity of 30 patients with intracranial lesions. We agreed on 86.7% of our ratings. The Kendall's tau correlation between our grades was .847 (p less than .001). Thus, the relationship between the raters' judgments was significant and the reliability was good. Although the results were limited to the elbow flexor muscle group, we believe them to be positive enough to encourage further trials of the modified Ashworth scale for grading spasticity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation.

              Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques can be used to monitor and modulate the excitability of intracortical neuronal circuits. Long periods of cortical stimulation can produce lasting effects on brain function, paving the way for therapeutic applications of NIBS in chronic neurological disease. The potential of NIBS in stroke rehabilitation has been of particular interest, because stroke is the main cause of permanent disability in industrial nations, and treatment outcomes often fail to meet the expectations of patients. Despite promising reports from many clinical trials on NIBS for stroke recovery, the number of studies reporting a null effect remains a concern. One possible explanation is that the interhemispheric competition model--which posits that suppressing the excitability of the hemisphere not affected by stroke will enhance recovery by reducing interhemispheric inhibition of the stroke hemisphere, and forms the rationale for many studies--is oversimplified or even incorrect. Here, we critically review the proposed mechanisms of synaptic and functional reorganization after stroke, and suggest a bimodal balance-recovery model that links interhemispheric balancing and functional recovery to the structural reserve spared by the lesion. The proposed model could enable NIBS to be tailored to the needs of individual patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Neurorehabil Neural Repair
                Neurorehabil Neural Repair
                NNR
                spnnr
                Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                1545-9683
                1552-6844
                2 December 2022
                December 2022
                : 36
                : 12
                : 800-809
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
                [2 ]Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
                [3 ]IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
                [4 ]Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
                [5 ]Neurology Unit, “M. Bufalini” Hospital, Cesena, AUSL Romagna, Italy
                [6 ]Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico,” Rome, Italy
                Author notes
                [*]Giovanni Morone, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, 67100, Italy. Email: giovanni.morone@ 123456univaq.it
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Matteo Paolucci is also affiliated to IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italia

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3602-4197
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2631-4185
                Article
                10.1177_15459683221138743
                10.1177/15459683221138743
                9720706
                36458455
                44209e40-fd51-48e7-9d6c-d1273651df29
                © The Author(s) 2022

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Categories
                Original Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                robotic therapy,exoskeleton,tdcs,non-invasive brain stimulation,interhemispheric balance,stroke,rehabilitation

                Comments

                Comment on this article