5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Perspectives of healthcare professionals on training for quantitative G6PD testing during implementation of tafenoquine in Brazil (QualiTRuST Study)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Effective radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria is essential for malaria elimination in Brazil. P. vivax radical cure requires administration of a schizonticide, such as chloroquine, plus an 8-aminoquinoline. However, 8-aminoquinolines cause hemolysis in individuals with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, requiring prior screening to exclude those at risk. Brazil is pioneering the implementation of tafenoquine, a single-dose 8-aminoquinoline indicated for P. vivax patients with >70% of normal G6PD activity. Tafenoquine implementation in Manaus and Porto Velho, two municipalities located in the western Brazilian Amazon, included comprehensive training of healthcare professionals (HCPs) on point-of-care quantitative G6PD testing and a new treatment algorithm for P. vivax radical cure incorporating tafenoquine. Training was initially provided to higher-level facilities (phase one) and later adapted for primary care units (phase two). This study analyzed HCP experiences during training and implementation and identified barriers and facilitators. In-depth interviews and focus discussion groups were conducted 30 days after each training for a purposive random sample of 115 HCPs. Thematic analysis was employed using MAXQDA software, analyzing data through inductive and deductive coding. Analysis showed that following the initial training for higher-level facilities, some HCPs did not feel confident performing quantitative G6PD testing and prescribing the tafenoquine regimen. Modifications to the training in phase two resulted in an improvement in understanding the implementation process of the G6PD test and tafenoquine, as well as in the knowledge acquired by HCPs. Additionally, knowledge gaps were addressed through in situ training, peer communication via a messaging app, and educational materials. Training supported effective deployment of the new tools in Manaus and Porto Velho and increased awareness of the need for pharmacovigilance. A training approach for nationwide implementation of these tools was devised. Implementing quantitative G6PD testing and tafenoquine represents a significant shift in P. vivax malaria case management. Consistent engagement with HCPs is needed to overcome challenges in fully integrating these tools within the Brazilian health system.

          Author summary

          Brazil has implemented tafenoquine and quantitative G6PD testing as a crucial component of its comprehensive strategy to eliminate Plasmodium vivax malaria. Training of healthcare professionals (HCPs) has played a pivotal role in facilitating the adoption of these new strategies. In any implementation, it is necessary to identify barriers and facilitators and consider data that cannot typically be collected in purely quantitative studies. This qualitative study describes the perceptions of HCPs regarding the training they received and the knowledge gaps that only became apparent in their professional practice after the training. These insights were instrumental in developing various communication and continuing education strategies that enhanced HCP knowledge following training. Finally, the study presents a training approach for applying quantitative G6PD testing and the tafenoquine treatment regimen, including the most effective educational activities and materials to support the HCP learning process.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

          Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups). We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed. Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research.

            Purposeful sampling is widely used in qualitative research for the identification and selection of information-rich cases related to the phenomenon of interest. Although there are several different purposeful sampling strategies, criterion sampling appears to be used most commonly in implementation research. However, combining sampling strategies may be more appropriate to the aims of implementation research and more consistent with recent developments in quantitative methods. This paper reviews the principles and practice of purposeful sampling in implementation research, summarizes types and categories of purposeful sampling strategies and provides a set of recommendations for use of single strategy or multistage strategy designs, particularly for state implementation research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review

              The RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework was conceptualized two decades ago. As one of the most frequently applied implementation frameworks, RE-AIM has now been cited in over 2,800 publications. This paper describes the application and evolution of RE-AIM as well as lessons learned from its use. RE-AIM has been applied most often in public health and health behavior change research, but increasingly in more diverse content areas and within clinical, community, and corporate settings. We discuss challenges of using RE-AIM while encouraging a more pragmatic use of key dimensions rather than comprehensive applications of all elements. Current foci of RE-AIM include increasing the emphasis on cost and adaptations to programs and expanding the use of qualitative methods to understand “how” and “why” results came about. The framework will continue to evolve to focus on contextual and explanatory factors related to RE-AIM outcomes, package RE-AIM for use by non-researchers, and integrate RE-AIM with other pragmatic and reporting frameworks.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Negl Trop Dis
                PLoS Negl Trop Dis
                plos
                PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1935-2727
                1935-2735
                5 June 2024
                June 2024
                : 18
                : 6
                : e0012197
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, Brazil
                [2 ] Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil
                [3 ] Centro de Pesquisa em Medicina Tropical de Rondônia (CEPEM), Porto Velho, Brazil
                [4 ] Medicines for Malaria Venture, Geneva, Switzerland
                [5 ] Brazilian Ministry of Health, Brasília, Brazil
                [6 ] Fundação de Vigilância em Saúde, Manaus, Brazil
                [7 ] Instituto Leônidas & Maria Deane, Fiocruz, Manaus, Brazil
                [8 ] University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America
                Menzies School of Health Research, AUSTRALIA
                Author notes

                I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: PGD is employed by Medicines for Malaria Venture and CP and FEL Jr are employed by the Brazilian Ministry of Health.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4414-3989
                Article
                PNTD-D-23-01477
                10.1371/journal.pntd.0012197
                11152287
                38837977
                4719d14d-fbec-4b66-87f4-bb06496eecf9
                © 2024 Santos et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 20 November 2023
                : 6 May 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 4, Pages: 25
                Funding
                Funded by: National Council for Scientific and Technical Development (CNPq)
                Funded by: Ministry of Health Brazil
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation;
                Award ID: 442910/2019-3
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004167, Medicines for Malaria Venture;
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation;
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009022, Newcrest Mining;
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100013986, Government of the United Kingdom;
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation;
                Award ID: OPP1059029
                Funded by: National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Fundação de Apoio a Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas (FAPEAM)
                Award Recipient :
                This project was funded by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Ministry of Health of Brazil, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant Number 442910/2019-3). This project was also funded by Medicines for Malaria Venture by grants from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Newcrest mining and the UK Government. This work was supported in whole or in part by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Global Health Grant Number OPP1059029), under the grant conditions of the Foundation, a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic License has already been assigned to the Author Accepted Manuscript version that might arise from this submission. ML and WM are supported by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). DB-S is supported by the Fundação de Apoio a Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas (FAPEAM). Medicines for Malaria Venture and the Brazilian Ministry of Health were involved in the study design and conduct, the development of this publication and the decision to publish. Other donors had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medical Conditions
                Parasitic Diseases
                Malaria
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medical Conditions
                Tropical Diseases
                Malaria
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Parasitology
                Parasite Groups
                Apicomplexa
                Plasmodium
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmacology
                Drugs
                Primaquine
                People and places
                Geographical locations
                South America
                Brazil
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Medical Personnel
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Human Learning
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Human Learning
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Human Learning
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Learning and Memory
                Learning
                Human Learning
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Maternal Health
                Breast Feeding
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pediatrics
                Neonatology
                Breast Feeding
                Engineering and Technology
                Equipment
                Laboratory Equipment
                Pipettes
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article