23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      High-Tech and Tactile: Cognitive Enrichment for Zoo-Housed Gorillas

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The field of environmental enrichment for zoo animals, particularly great apes, has been revived by technological advancements such as touchscreen interfaces and motion sensors. However, direct animal-computer interaction (ACI) is impractical or undesirable for many zoos. We developed a modular cuboid puzzle maze for the troop of six Western lowland gorillas ( Gorilla gorilla gorilla) at Bristol Zoo Gardens, United Kingdom. The gorillas could use their fingers or tools to interact with interconnected modules and remove food rewards. Twelve modules could be interchanged within the frame to create novel iterations with every trial. We took a screen-free approach to enrichment: substituting ACI for tactile, physically complex device components, in addition to hidden automatic sensors, and cameras to log device use. The current study evaluated the gorillas’ behavioral responses to the device, and evaluated it as a form of “cognitive enrichment.” Five out of six gorillas used the device, during monthly trials of 1 h duration, over a 6 month period. All users were female including two infants, and there were significant individual differences in duration of device use. The successful extraction of food rewards was only performed by the three tool-using gorillas. Device use did not diminish over time, and gorillas took turns to use the device alone or as one mother-infant dyad. Our results suggest that the device was a form of cognitive enrichment for the study troop because it allowed gorillas to solve novel challenges, and device use was not associated with behavioral indicators of stress or frustration. However, device exposure had no significant effects on gorilla activity budgets. The device has the potential to be a sustainable enrichment method in the long-term, tailored to individual gorilla skill levels and motivations. Our study represents a technological advancement for gorilla enrichment, an area which had been particularly overlooked until now. We wholly encourage the continued development of this physical maze system for other great apes under human care, with or without computer logging technology.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Observational study of behavior: sampling methods.

          J Altmann (1974)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Play and optimal welfare: Does play indicate the presence of positive affective states?

              Play is commonly used to assess affective states in both humans and non-human animals. Play appears to be most common when animals are well-fed and not under any direct threats to fitness. Could play and playfulness therefore indicate pre-existing positive emotions, and thence optimal animal welfare? We examine this question by surveying the internal and external conditions that promote or suppress play in a variety of species, starting with humans. We find that negative affective states and poor welfare usually do suppress play (although there are notable exceptions where the opposite occurs). Furthermore, research in children suggests that beyond the frequency or total duration of play, poor welfare may additionally be reflected in qualitative aspects of this heterogeneous behaviour (e.g. display of solitary over social play; and the 'fragmentation' of play bouts) that are often overlooked in animals. There are surprisingly few studies of play in subjects with pre-existing optimal welfare or in unambiguously highly positive affective states, making it currently impossible to determine whether play can distinguish optimal or good welfare from merely neutral welfare. This therefore represents an important and exciting area for future research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                09 July 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 1574
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Field Conservation and Science, Bristol Zoological Society , Bristol, United Kingdom
                [2] 2School of Psychological Science, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol , Bristol, United Kingdom
                [3] 3Centre for Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol , Bristol, United Kingdom
                [4] 4Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol , Bristol, United Kingdom
                [5] 5Department of Health and Social Sciences, University of the West of England , Bristol, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Edited by: Terry L. Maple, Georgia Institute of Technology, United States

                Reviewed by: Jennifer Vonk, Oakland University, United States; Sue Margulis, Canisius College, United States

                *Correspondence: Fay E. Clark, fclark@ 123456bristolzoo.org.uk

                This article was submitted to Comparative Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01574
                6629937
                31354581
                4688d42e-9836-4479-a482-ec13cd7bf2bf
                Copyright © 2019 Clark, Gray, Bennett, Mason and Burgess.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 18 April 2019
                : 21 June 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 5, Equations: 0, References: 79, Pages: 15, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: University of Bristol 10.13039/501100000883
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                animal cognition,behavior,challenge,gorilla gorilla gorilla,maze,puzzle,technology,welfare

                Comments

                Comment on this article