1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Processing emotional prosody in a foreign language: the case of German and Hebrew

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study investigated the universality of emotional prosody in perception of discrete emotions when semantics is not available. In two experiments the perception of emotional prosody in Hebrew and German by listeners who speak one of the languages but not the other was investigated. Having a parallel tool in both languages allowed to conduct controlled comparisons. In Experiment 1, 39 native German speakers with no knowledge of Hebrew and 80 native Israeli speakers rated Hebrew sentences spoken with four different emotional prosodies (anger, fear, happiness, sadness) or neutral. The Hebrew version of the Test for Rating of Emotions in Speech (T-RES) was used for this purpose. Ratings indicated participants’ agreement on how much the sentence conveyed each of four discrete emotions (anger, fear, happiness and sadness). In Experient 2, 30 native speakers of German, and 24 Israeli native speakers of Hebrew who had no knowledge of German rated sentences of the German version of the T-RES. Based only on the prosody, German-speaking participants were able to accurately identify the emotions in the Hebrew sentences and Hebrew-speaking participants were able to identify the emotions in the German sentences. In both experiments ratings between the groups were similar. These findings show that individuals are able to identify emotions in a foreign language even if they do not have access to semantics. This ability goes beyond identification of target emotion; similarities between languages exist even for “wrong” perception. This adds to accumulating evidence in the literature on the universality of emotional prosody.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41809-022-00107-x.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

          G*Power is a free power analysis program for a variety of statistical tests. We present extensions and improvements of the version introduced by Faul, Erdfelder, Lang, and Buchner (2007) in the domain of correlation and regression analyses. In the new version, we have added procedures to analyze the power of tests based on (1) single-sample tetrachoric correlations, (2) comparisons of dependent correlations, (3) bivariate linear regression, (4) multiple linear regression based on the random predictor model, (5) logistic regression, and (6) Poisson regression. We describe these new features and provide a brief introduction to their scope and handling.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories

            The psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) were evaluated in a normal sample of N = 717 who were also administered the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). The DASS was shown to possess satisfactory psychometric properties, and the factor structure was substantiated both by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In comparison to the BDI and BAI, the DASS scales showed greater separation in factor loadings. The DASS Anxiety scale correlated 0.81 with the BAI, and the DASS Depression scale correlated 0.74 with the BDI. Factor analyses suggested that the BDI differs from the DASS Depression scale primarily in that the BDI includes items such as weight loss, insomnia, somatic preoccupation and irritability, which fail to discriminate between depression and other affective states. The factor structure of the combined BDI and BAI items was virtually identical to that reported by Beck for a sample of diagnosed depressed and anxious patients, supporting the view that these clinical states are more severe expressions of the same states that may be discerned in normals. Implications of the results for the conceptualisation of depression, anxiety and tension/stress are considered, and the utility of the DASS scales in discriminating between these constructs is discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential.

              The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) is a non-verbal pictorial assessment technique that directly measures the pleasure, arousal, and dominance associated with a person's affective reaction to a wide variety of stimuli. In this experiment, we compare reports of affective experience obtained using SAM, which requires only three simple judgments, to the Semantic Differential scale devised by Mehrabian and Russell (An approach to environmental psychology, 1974) which requires 18 different ratings. Subjective reports were measured to a series of pictures that varied in both affective valence and intensity. Correlations across the two rating methods were high both for reports of experienced pleasure and felt arousal. Differences obtained in the dominance dimension of the two instruments suggest that SAM may better track the personal response to an affective stimulus. SAM is an inexpensive, easy method for quickly assessing reports of affective response in many contexts.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                lachmann@sowi.uni-kl.de
                Journal
                J Cult Cogn Sci
                J Cult Cogn Sci
                Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science
                Springer Nature Singapore (Singapore )
                2520-100X
                2520-1018
                18 August 2022
                18 August 2022
                : 1-18
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Communication, Aging and Neuropsychology Lab (CAN Lab), Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Reichman University (IDC), Herzliya, Israel
                [2 ]GRID grid.443007.4, ISNI 0000 0004 0604 7694, Department of Communications Disorders, , Achva Academic College, ; Arugot, Israel
                [3 ]GRID grid.17063.33, ISNI 0000 0001 2157 2938, Department of Speech-Language Pathology, , University of Toronto, ; Toronto, ON Canada
                [4 ]GRID grid.231844.8, ISNI 0000 0004 0474 0428, KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, , University Health Networks (UHN), ; Toronto, ON Canada
                [5 ]GRID grid.7645.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2155 0333, Cognitive and Developmental Psychology Unit, Center for Cognitive Science, , University of Kaiserslautern, ; Kaiserslautern, Germany
                [6 ]GRID grid.6810.f, ISNI 0000 0001 2294 5505, Chemnitz University of Technology, ; Chemnitz, Germany
                [7 ]GRID grid.7645.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2155 0333, Psycholinguistics and Language Development Unit, Center for Cognitive Science, , University of Kaiserslautern, ; Kaiserslautern, Germany
                [8 ]GRID grid.464701.0, ISNI 0000 0001 0674 2310, Centro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), , Universidad Nebrija, ; Madrid, Spain
                [9 ]GRID grid.5596.f, ISNI 0000 0001 0668 7884, University of Leuven, ; Leuven, Belgium
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7055-7080
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6901-5935
                Article
                107
                10.1007/s41809-022-00107-x
                9386669
                45a04aa3-67e3-416a-a6c5-7140bd89b16a
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 7 April 2022
                : 13 June 2022
                : 16 July 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001736, German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development;
                Award ID: I-1324-105.4/2015
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Technische Universität Kaiserslautern (3142)
                Categories
                Research Paper

                cross-cultural,emotional prosody,semantics,language comparison,universality

                Comments

                Comment on this article