30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Is Chiari malformation nature's protective “air-bag”? Is its presence diagnostic of atlantoaxial instability?

      editorial
      Journal of Craniovertebral Junction & Spine
      Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Several authors have evaluated the subject of Chiari malformation since its first description by Cleland in 1883.[1] A number of hypothesis and speculations have been proposed as to the cause and effects of Chiari malformation.[2 3 4 5 6] A congenital anomaly is generally agreed to be the cause. Smaller posterior fossa volume that in unable to contain the cerebellar mass that herniates into the spinal canal has been the most accepted pathogenic phenomenon. Structural defects caused by genetic mutations, or lack of proper vitamins or nutrients in the maternal diet are also considered to be the probable cause. The cerebellar tonsils herniate into the spinal canal through the foramen magnum and appear to cause compression of the critical neural structures. Frequently, the precise pathogenesis of Chiari malformation is unclear or not recognized. In some of such cases, Chiari malformation is associated with bone malformation and basilar invagination. In cases where no definite cause is identified or when there are associated bone anomalies, Chiari malformation is generally considered to be a component of the entire complex and a congenital anomaly. Basilar invagination is a frequent bony accompaniment and syringomyelia is a frequent soft tissue association. Associated syringomyelia is also considered to be a result of an error in embryogenesis. Syrinx formation is frequently implicated to blockage of the cerebrospinal fluid flow pathways at the level of foramen magnum by the herniated tonsils. Chiari malformation is rarely associated with tumors in the posterior cranial fossa,[7] hydrocephalus and meningomyelocele. It does seem that Chiari malformation is always secondary to an obvious or an unidentified pathology. Identification and treatment of the primary pathological cause rather than direct manipulation of the tonsils appears to be the solution. We have evaluated the subject of craniovertebral junction for over 30 years.[8 9 10 11 12] During our study, we identified that atlantoaxial instability forms the primary point of instability at the craniovertebral junction.[8 9 10 11 12] Atlantoaxial joint is the center for movements, and occipitoatlantal joint is the center for stability of the most mobile and most stable joint-complex of the body at craniovertebral junction. The atlantoaxial joint is not only the center for mobility but is also a center of instability. Atlantoaxial dislocation in cases with basilar invagination was considered to be irreducible or fixed until not long ago. Such an understanding resulted in treatment protocol that essentially focused on decompression of compressing bone elements either from anterior route by transoral surgery or by posterior route by foramen magnum bone and dural decompressive surgery. The identification that despite the fact that dynamic imaging does not reveal mobility of atlantoaxial instability, the atlantoaxial joint in such cases is abnormally or pathologically mobile and is potentially reducible by manual manipulations has revolutionized the treatment paradigm for such clinical anomalies.[10] The current treatment strategy for hitherto considered irreducible or fixed atlantoaxial dislocation is essentially focused on craniovertebral realignment and atlantoaxial stabilization.[13] Atlantoaxial dislocation or instability has been essentially radiologically assessed and confirmed by the distancing of the odontoid process from the anterior arch of atlas. Our recent study on the subject has revealed that atlantoaxial instability can be present even when atlantodental interval is within the range of normalcy. We re-classified atlantoaxial dislocation and basilar invagination on the basis of facetal alignment into three types.[14 15] Type A atlantoaxial facetal dislocation was when the facet of atlas was dislocated anterior to the facet of axis. Such a form of dislocation results in superior and posterior migration of the odontoid process and results in atlantoaxial dislocation and basilar invagination. There is an increase in atlantodental interval, and the odontoid process migrates posteriorly into the spinal canal. The process results in compression or compromise of the neural structures. Due to the early effects on the neural structures and the resultant neural deficits the clinical manifestations are rather acute or subacute in nature. In the lateral profile, the atlantoaxial facetal dislocation in such cases simulates lumbosacral listhesis.[16] In the acute form such instability results in atlantoaxial dislocation and in the more subacute or chronic form, it results in atlantoaxial dislocation and basilar invagination. Type B facetal dislocation is when the facet of atlas is dislocated posterior to the facet of axis. In such a form of instability, the odontoid process does not migrate posteriorly into the spinal canal, and the atlantodental interval is not significantly increased or altered. Type C facetal dislocation is when there is no radiological misalignment of the facets and the instability is identified only on the basis of clinical understanding and intraoperative observations. The instability in such cases was labeled as central or axial. As the neural compromise is not significant or early in both Types B and Type C dislocation, the clinical manifestations are rather chronic in nature.[14 15] In acute and chronic or longstanding atlantoaxial instability the natural defenses of the body seem to play a defining role to protect the neural structures from damage by the bones. In an acute state, there is a spasm of the neck muscles that restrict the movements. The muscles of the nape of the neck are under the spasm and restrict neck flexion movements that can be disastrous for neural structures. In the more chronic states that span over several years, the restriction of the neck movements become more fixed. In such cases, hyperextension of the neck is more easily possible, and flexion of the neck is restricted. Over the period, such chronic neck spasm results in shortening of the neck and wherever the potential or manifest compression is relatively unilateral it results in torticollis. Shortening of the neck is affected by reduction in the disc spaces rather than the reduction in height of the vertebral bodies. The reduction in the disc spaces frequently results in secondary osteophyte formation and radiological features of “spondylosis.” Bone fusions and “Klippel Feil abnormalities” can be a result of such neck shortening. The bone fusions are more frequent at the craniovertebral junction and assimilation of the atlas and C2-3 bone fusions are relatively common forms of bone fusion. The frequently observed alteration in the cranial bones is platybasia and an overall reduction in the posterior cranial fossa volume.[8 17] Chiari malformation and herniation of the cerebellar tonsils into the foramen magnum appears to the natural protective phenomenon in the face of atlantoaxial instability.[18] Chiari malformation appears to be Nature's air-bag phenomenon and the tonsils migrate into the spinal canal and are designed and positioned to prevent pinching of critical neural structures between bones. Syringomyelia is formed in an effort to neutralize cranial and spinal pressure and to support the bulk of Chiari malformation.[19] The very fact that there is a frequently observed atrophy of the cerebellar substance that is more prominent of the superior vermis suggests that an increased bulk of cerebellum in a smaller posterior cranial fossa may not be the cause of cerebellar herniation.[18 20] On the other hand, herniation of the tonsils in the spinal canal is a supremely designed and magically executed ‘divine’ phenomenon, an act of the Nature that is all protective and in no way pathological. The very fact that atlantoaxial stabilization results in a reversal of most secondary alterations validates the hypothesis.[17] Increase in the neck size and torticollis and reversal of several other musculoskeletal changes including a reduction in the size of syrinx and reverse migration of the cerebellar tonsils occurs in the immediate or early postoperative phase.[18] We speculated that with the increase in length of the neck that is affected by an increase in the disc space height, there can be regression of the osteophytes, and there can even be potential reversal of bone fusions.[18] The return to normal of a number of so-called pathological entities by the atlantoaxial fixation and without direct manipulation suggests that the theory of embryological dysgenesis needs to be re-assessed. Improvement of clinical symptoms following posterior fossa foramen magnum decompression simulates deflating of air-bag following a disaster.[18] However, such an operation has been frequently associated with recurrence of symptoms after a period. Presence of Chiari malformation can focus the attention of the clinician toward atlantoaxial instability. Treatment of the instability is the solution, and direct manipulation of tonsils or bone and dural decompression may be counter-productive.[18]

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Chiari I malformation redefined: clinical and radiographic findings for 364 symptomatic patients.

          Chiari malformations are regarded as a pathological continuum of hindbrain maldevelopments characterized by downward herniation of the cerebellar tonsils. The Chiari I malformation (CMI) is defined as tonsillar herniation of at least 3 to 5 mm below the foramen magnum. Increased detection of CMI has emphasized the need for more information regarding the clinical features of the disorder. We examined a prospective cohort of 364 symptomatic patients. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the head and spine, and some were evaluated using CINE-magnetic resonance imaging and other neurodiagnostic tests. For 50 patients and 50 age- and gender-matched control subjects, the volume of the posterior cranial fossa was calculated by the Cavalieri method. The families of 21 patients participated in a study of familial aggregation. There were 275 female and 89 male patients. The age of onset was 24.9+/-15.8 years (mean +/- standard deviation), and 89 patients (24%) cited trauma as the precipitating event. Common associated problems included syringomyelia (65%), scoliosis (42%), and basilar invagination (12%). Forty-three patients (12%) reported positive family histories of CMI or syringomyelia. Pedigrees for 21 families showed patterns consistent with autosomal dominant or recessive inheritance. The clinical syndrome of CMI was found to consist of the following: 1) headaches, 2) pseudotumor-like episodes, 3) a Meniere's disease-like syndrome, 4) lower cranial nerve signs, and 5) spinal cord disturbances in the absence of syringomyelia. The most consistent magnetic resonance imaging findings were obliteration of the retrocerebellar cerebrospinal fluid spaces (364 patients), tonsillar herniation of at least 5 mm (332 patients), and varying degrees of cranial base dysplasia. Volumetric calculations for the posterior cranial fossa revealed a significant reduction of total volume (mean, 13.4 ml) and a 40% reduction of cerebrospinal fluid volume (mean, 10.8 ml), with normal brain volume. These data support accumulating evidence that CMI is a disorder of the para-axial mesoderm that is characterized by underdevelopment of the posterior cranial fossa and overcrowding of the normally developed hindbrain. Tonsillar herniation of less than 5 mm does not exclude the diagnosis. Clinical manifestations of CMI seem to be related to cerebrospinal fluid disturbances (which are responsible for headaches, pseudotumor-like episodes, endolymphatic hydrops, syringomyelia, and hydrocephalus) and direct compression of nervous tissue. The demonstration of familial aggregation suggests a genetic component of transmission.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mechanisms of cerebellar tonsil herniation in patients with Chiari malformations as guide to clinical management

            Background The pathogenesis of Chiari malformations is incompletely understood. We tested the hypothesis that different etiologies have different mechanisms of cerebellar tonsil herniation (CTH), as revealed by posterior cranial fossa (PCF) morphology. Methods In 741 patients with Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) and 11 patients with Chiari malformation type II (CM-II), the size of the occipital enchondrium and volume of the PCF (PCFV) were measured on reconstructed 2D-CT and MR images of the skull. Measurements were compared with those in 80 age- and sex-matched healthy control individuals, and the results were correlated with clinical findings. Results Significant reductions of PCF size and volume were present in 388 patients with classical CM-I, 11 patients with CM-II, and five patients with CM-I and craniosynostosis. Occipital bone size and PCFV were normal in 225 patients with CM-I and occipitoatlantoaxial joint instability, 55 patients with CM-I and tethered cord syndrome (TCS), 30 patients with CM-I and intracranial mass lesions, and 28 patients with CM-I and lumboperitoneal shunts. Ten patients had miscellaneous etiologies. The size and area of the foramen magnum were significantly smaller in patients with classical CM-I and CM-I occurring with craniosynostosis and significantly larger in patients with CM-II and CM-I occurring with TCS. Conclusions Important clues concerning the pathogenesis of CTH were provided by morphometric measurements of the PCF. When these assessments were correlated with etiological factors, the following causal mechanisms were suggested: (1) cranial constriction; (2) cranial settling; (3) spinal cord tethering; (4) intracranial hypertension; and (5) intraspinal hypotension.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Goel's classification of atlantoaxial “facetal” dislocation

              Atul Goel (2014)
              Atlantoaxial facet joints are the center of mobility and also center for instability of the atlantoaxial region. It is one of the most mobile joints of the body. It may not be an over-exaggeration to state that all craniovertebral instability can be incriminated to atlantoaxial dislocation. Occipitoaxial joint is the center for stability. Instability related to occipitoaxial joint is remarkably rare and identified infrequently in children with syndromic issues and rarely in cases with trauma. The atlantoaxial joints of two sides along with the occipitoaxial joints form the rostral two limbs of the “Y” shaped configuration of the human spinal support pillar. Any instability of the atlantoaxial region starts from the joint and manifests in the rest of the components of bones of the region. The concept of atlantoaxial instability based on facetal alignment or mal-alignment has not been discussed earlier in the literature. The atlantoaxial instability has been traditionally gauzed by the atlantodental interval that signifies the abnormal movement of the odontoid process away from the circle of atlas and toward the neural structures in the spinal canal. The indentation of the odontoid process into the critical cervicomedullary neural structures result in related symptoms. Such instability is the more common form of atlantoaxial dislocation. The facetal instability can be observed on good quality and modern computer-based imaging. Such visualization was either not possible or was unclear with plain radiography that formed the core investigation not too long ago. To assess the instability of the atlantoaxial joint, it is necessary that the facetal alignment is appropriately evaluated, and the implications of mal-alignment of facets are understood. Three-dimensional computed tomography images provide a perspective of the relationship and alignment of the facets. The facets of atlas and axis are strong in their material content and larger in size when compared to all the other facets of the spine.[1] Two large superior articular facets of axis flank the odontoid process. Superior facet of C2 vertebra differs from the facets of all other vertebrae in two important characters. First is that the superior facet of C2 is present in proximity to the body when compared to other facets, which are located in proximity to the lamina. The second is that the vertebral artery foramen is present partially or completely in the inferior aspect of the superior facet of C2, while in other cervical vertebrae, vertebral artery foramen is located entirely in relationship with the transverse process. Unlike superior facets of all other vertebrae, they do not form a pillar with the inferior facets, being considerably anterior to these. The course of the vertebral artery in relationship to the inferior aspect of the superior articular facet of the C2 makes its susceptible to injury during Magerl's transarticular and Goel's inter-facetal screw implantation techniques.[2 3 4 5] The inferior facet of the atlas is almost circular in most of the vertebrae without any significant difference in the mean anteroposterior and transverse (15 mm) dimensions. All types of dislocations can be divided into mobile and reducible varieties. The dislocation is mobile and reducible when dynamic images with head inflexion show the dislocation and head in extension shows complete reduction of the dislocation. Although such a dislocation can be observed relatively easily by the increase in the atlantodental interval on flexion of head, facetal mal-alignment can also provide additional information about the instability and sometimes can provide a clue as to the pathogenesis of instability. The dislocation can be completely reducible, or it can be partially or incompletely reducible. The classification of any dislocation into reducible and irreducible varieties has considerable therapeutic implications. Whilst fixation in reduced position is necessary in reducible atlantoaxial dislocation anterior or posterior decompressive surgery is possible in cases where the dislocation is fixed. Irreducible dislocations formed a distinct category until not long ago. The dislocation in basilar invagination was also considered to be irreducible. Goel introduced a concept that stated that atlantoaxial dislocation is never or only extremely rarely fixed or irreducible.[6] More importantly, the concept stated that the dislocation could be manually reducible. Even in basilar invagination the dislocation is mobile and manually reducible. This concept has revolutionized the treatment paradigm of a number of pathological entities involving the craniovertebral junction, particularly those where the atlantoaxial dislocation was considered to be irreducible or fixed. Decompressive bone surgery, both from anterior transoral route and also from posterior route are seldom considered in the present day treatment. The head positioning and natural curvatures of the spine makes it susceptible for anterior dislocation of the facet of atlas over the facet of axis. Such anterior facetal dislocation [Figure 1a] results in posterior movement of the odontoid process away from the anterior arch of atlas and into the spinal canal with eventual possibility of compromise of the critical neural structures at the craniovertebral junction [Figure 1b]. We labeled such an anterior atlantoaxial facetal dislocation as Type 1 dislocation. Figure 1a Computed tomography scan showing basilar invagination, assimilation of atlas, os-terminale and severe cord compression Figure 1b Sagittal cut of computed tomography scan passing through the facets, showing Type 1 atlantoaxial facetal dislocation We identified another type of atlantoaxial instability wherein the facets of atlas are dislocated posterior to the facet of axis on lateral profile [Figure 2]. This type of posterior atlantoaxial facetal dislocation has not been described earlier in the literature. The relationship of the facets on dynamic imaging is inconsistent in these cases. We labeled such instability as Type 2 dislocation [Figures 2c–e]. We identified yet another type of dislocation wherein there was no facetal mal-alignment or any alterations in the atlantodental interval [Figures 3a–e]. The instability or dislocation could only be identified by manual manipulations during surgery and can be understood on appropriate clinical evaluation. We labeled such instability as “central” atlantoaxial facetal dislocation. Essentially, it means that in these cases, the instability is present but dynamic images are unable to identify it. Figure 2a T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with the head in extension position showing basilar invagination, atlantoaxial dislocation, and Chiari malformation Figure 2b Computed tomography scan with the head inflexed position shows assimilation of atlas and an increase in the atlantodental interval suggesting instability Figure 2c Computed tomography scan with the head inflexion showing the atlantoaxial facets in alignment Figure 2d Computed tomography scan with the head in extension position showing a reduction of the atlantoaxial dislocation Figure 2e Computed tomography scan with the head in extensions shows Type 2 atlantoaxial facetal dislocation Figure 3a T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging showing basilar invagination, Chiari malformation and syringomyelia Figure 3b Sagittal cut of computed tomography scan showing assimilation of atlas and basilar invagination Figure 3c Sagittal cut of computed tomography scan through the facets showing no mal-alignment of the facets. This type of instability is Type 3 atlantoaxial facetal instability Figure 3d Postoperative computed tomography scan showing a reduction of basilar invagination Figure 3e Sagittal image of postoperative computed tomography scan with the cut through the facets showing the atlantoaxial implants and an intra-articular spacer In Type 2 and Type 3 dislocation, the atlantodental interval is frequently unaffected, and the odontoid process may or may not indent into the neural structures [Figures 2b and 3b]. As the neural compromise is not a prominent or an early feature, Type 2 and Type 3 dislocation are associated with chronic instability and the entire process is longstanding and relentlessly progressive. Although musculoskeletal alterations and neural structural malformations are frequently associated with Type 1 dislocation they are significantly remarkable and hallmarks of Type 2 and Type 3 facetal dislocation. Basilar invagination Group B is frequently associated with Type 2 and Type 3 atlantoaxial facetal dislocation. According to our current concept, all these structural musculoskeletal and neural malformations are natural processes meant to reduce the effect of instability and prevent neural compression and compromise.[7] Our experience with direct facetal handling and manipulations suggests that the atlantoaxial dislocation is not fixed or irreducible in general and particularly in cases with basilar invagination as was previously considered, but instability of the region is “profound.” We also observed that as soon as stabilization surgery is done, clinical neurological improvement occurs instantly and musculoskeletal and neural alterations reverse. It is as if the cord is stunned in this situation without being compressed. Signals of instability are passed on and reparative natural processes begin and proceed over long time durations. It does seem that instability of the atlantoaxial joint is the primary event and all the other musculoskeletal and neural alterations are secondary and basically protective. It may be that in some cases, the instability is initiated during fetal life, or early infancy and the reparative processes begin at that stage. Lateral atlantoaxial facetal dislocation [Figures 4a and b] is when the facet of the atlas is dislocated lateral in relationship with the facet of axis.[8] Such a dislocation is frequently identified when the ring of the atlas is bifid or fractured resulting in lateral migration of the facet of atlas in relationship with the facet of axis. Vertical atlantoaxial dislocation is when the odontoid process migrates superiorly on flexion the head and returns back entirely or incompletely to normal position on head extension [Figures 5a–d]. Such a dislocation is related to incompetence of the facet joint. We labeled such a form of dislocation as “vertical mobile and reducible” atlantoaxial dislocation.[9] Rotatory atlantoaxial dislocation [Figures 6a and b] is when the facet of the atlas is dislocated posterior in relationship with the facet of axis on one side and anterior in its relationship on the contralateral side. Such a dislocation results in torticollis.[10] Translatory atlantoaxial dislocation is a clinical situation when the facets of atlas of both sides are dislocated anterior to the facets of axis.[10] Figure 4a Coronal image of computed tomography scan showing lateral displacement of facet of atlas in relationship with the occipital condyles and facets of axis Figure 4b Axial image of computed tomography scan showing fracture of anterior and posterior arches of atlas Figure 5a Computed tomography scan with the head in flexed position showing marked basilar invagination Figure 5b Computed tomography scan with the head in extension showing a reduction of the invagination Figure 5c Computed tomography scan cut through the facets showing suggestions of incompetence Figure 5d Postoperative computed tomography scan showing fixation in reduced position Figure 6a Three-dimensional computed tomography scan showing facetal mal-alignment related to rotatory atlantoaxial dislocation. The facet of the atlas is anterior to the facet of axis on one side and posterior to it on the other side Figure 6b File photograph of the child showing torticollis Surgery that involves direct facetal fixation like transarticular fixation or interfacetal fixation is mechanically and philosophically stronger than those that involve fixation of midline structures.[11] Such fixation procedures provide a “zero movement” situation that is conducive to early bone fusion and arthrodesis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Craniovertebr Junction Spine
                J Craniovertebr Junction Spine
                JCVJS
                Journal of Craniovertebral Junction & Spine
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0974-8237
                0976-9285
                Jul-Sep 2014
                : 5
                : 3
                : 107-109
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Neurosurgery, K.E.M. Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Dr. Atul Goel, Department of Neurosurgery, K.E.M. Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College, Parel, Mumbai - 400 012, Maharashtra, India. E-mail: atulgoel62@ 123456hotmail.com
                Article
                JCVJS-5-107
                10.4103/0974-8237.142302
                4201008
                25336830
                44efa8f1-7839-46a5-9eb6-23813b33109b
                Copyright: © Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Editorial

                Neurology
                Neurology

                Comments

                Comment on this article