0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Establishment of prediction model for mortality risk of pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and aim

          Pancreatic cancer possesses a high prevalence and mortality rate among other cancers. Despite the low survival rate of this cancer type, the early prediction of this disease has a crucial role in decreasing the mortality rate and improving the prognosis. So, this study.

          Materials and methods

          In this retrospective study, we used 654 alive and dead PC cases to establish the prediction model for PC. The six chosen machine learning algorithms and prognostic factors were utilized to build the prediction models. The importance of the predictive factors was assessed using the relative importance of a high-performing algorithm.

          Results

          The XG-Boost with AU-ROC of 0.933 (95% CI= [0.906–0.958]) and AU-ROC of 0.836 (95% CI= [0.789–0.865] in internal and external validation modes were considered as the best-performing model for predicting the mortality risk of PC. The factors, including tumor size, smoking, and chemotherapy, were considered the most influential for prediction.

          Conclusion

          The XG-Boost gained more performance efficiency in predicting the mortality risk of PC patients, so this model can promote the clinical solutions that doctors can achieve in healthcare environments to decrease the mortality risk of these patients.

          Highlights

          We developed machine learning models to predict the mortality risk of pancreatic cancer.

          XG-Boost demonstrated more competency in predicting mortality risk.

          Prognostic factors are essential for predicting the mortality risk of PC.

          Based on the external validation results, the clinical applicability of the XG-Boost is almost efficient in other clinical environments.

          Some lifestyle factors, such as smoking, have a significant role in predicting the mortality risk on this topic.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Feature selection in machine learning: A new perspective

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Performance evaluation of classification algorithms by k-fold and leave-one-out cross validation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Comparison of Conventional Statistical Methods with Machine Learning in Medicine: Diagnosis, Drug Development, and Treatment

              Futurists have anticipated that novel autonomous technologies, embedded with machine learning (ML), will substantially influence healthcare. ML is focused on making predictions as accurate as possible, while traditional statistical models are aimed at inferring relationships between variables. The benefits of ML comprise flexibility and scalability compared with conventional statistical approaches, which makes it deployable for several tasks, such as diagnosis and classification, and survival predictions. However, much of ML-based analysis remains scattered, lacking a cohesive structure. There is a need to evaluate and compare the performance of well-developed conventional statistical methods and ML on patient outcomes, such as survival, response to treatment, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In this article, we compare the usefulness and limitations of traditional statistical methods and ML, when applied to the medical field. Traditional statistical methods seem to be more useful when the number of cases largely exceeds the number of variables under study and a priori knowledge on the topic under study is substantial such as in public health. ML could be more suited in highly innovative fields with a huge bulk of data, such as omics, radiodiagnostics, drug development, and personalized treatment. Integration of the two approaches should be preferred over a unidirectional choice of either approach.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                raoof.n1370@gmail.com
                Journal
                BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
                BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
                BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6947
                27 June 2024
                27 June 2024
                2024
                : 24
                : 181
                Affiliations
                Department of Health Information Management, Student Research Committee, School of Health Management and Information Sciences Branch, Iran University of Medical Sciences, ( https://ror.org/03w04rv71) Tehran, Iran
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3770-2375
                Article
                2590
                10.1186/s12911-024-02590-4
                11210158
                38937795
                44d49afa-949c-4d31-8177-d47da23eb843
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 17 April 2024
                : 25 June 2024
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                Bioinformatics & Computational biology
                pancreatic cancer,mortality risk,machine learning,prediction model,prognostic factors

                Comments

                Comment on this article