Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Risk factors for omphalitis in neonatal dairy calves

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Knowledge about potential risk factors for animal health is crucial to achieve animal welfare. The aim of this study was to provide practical guidance for farmers to improve the health status of their youngstock by identifying and eliminating risk factors for omphalitis in neonatal calves. A cross-sectional study including 3,445 dairy calves from 567 farms located in three structurally different regions of Germany was performed from December 2016 to July 2019. On each farm calves aged five to 21 days underwent clinical examinations with special consideration of the umbilicus for signs of inflammation. Information regarding animal health, hygiene, and management was obtained via interviews with the farmers. Rearing conditions were recorded following visual inspection using written standard operating procedures. Multifactorial statistical analyses were performed to identify potential risk factors for omphalitis on animal and farm level. The overall omphalitis prevalence in calves aged five to 21 days was 30.9%. Across all regions and farms, every fourth calf per farm exhibited signs of omphalitis (median farm prevalence: 25.0%, interquartile range: 0.0–50.0%). According to the farmers, however, only 4.5% of the calves had been treated for omphalitis in the preceding 12 months. Risk factors for omphalitis identified included the dampness of the lying area in the first 2 weeks of life, a body condition score of the dam after calving outside the optimal range, and the time that calves spent with their dam after birth. Calves on farms providing dry lying areas in the first 2 weeks of life had 0.77 times the risk of omphalitis compared to calves on farms with predominantly damp bedding. When the dams were judged under- or over-conditioned after calving, their offspring had a 1.4 times higher omphalitis risk, respectively, compared to calves from dams optimal conditioned. Calves from farms separating calf and dam beyond 12 h after birth were 0.75 times as likely to develop omphalitis than calves from farms performing immediate separation. These results highlight the complexity of multifactorial diseases such as umbilical infection. The evidence presented can help to establish guidelines for dairy farmers to improve the umbilical health of their calves.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Body Condition Scoring Chart for Holstein Dairy Cows

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Invited review: Body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare.

            The body condition score (BCS) of a dairy cow is an assessment of the proportion of body fat that it possesses, and it is recognized by animal scientists and producers as being an important factor in dairy cattle management. The scale used to measure BCS differs between countries, but low values always reflect emaciation and high values equate to obesity. The intercalving profile of BCS is a mirror image of the milk lactation profile. Cows lose condition for 50 to 100 d postcalving, because of homeorhetic changes that occur in the somatotropic axis and the sensitivity of peripheral tissues to insulin, and the upregulation of lipolytic pathways in adipose tissue. Management and feeding have little effect on early postcalving BCS loss (wk 1 to 4 postcalving) until the natural period of insulin resistance has passed and the somatotropic axis has recoupled. There is evidence, however, that management and diet can influence the timing of recoupling of the somatotropic axis and the sensitivity of peripheral tissues to insulin, and gene expression differences in adipose tissue 30 d in milk confirm an effect of energy intake on lipogenic enzymes. The BCS in which a cow calves, nadir BCS, and the amount of BCS she loses postcalving are associated with milk production, reproduction, and health. Body condition score may also be a valid indicator of animal welfare, but further research is required to determine the effect of BCS and BCS change on how a cow "feels." Although the actual strength of the association may vary, there is relative consistency in the associations among calving and nadir BCS, and BCS change on milk production, postpartum anestrous, the likelihood of a successful pregnancy and days open, the risk of uterine infection, and the risk of metabolic disorders. For many production and health variables, the association with BCS is nonlinear, with an optimum calving BCS of 3.0 to 3.25 (5-point scale); lower calving BCS is associated with reduced production and reproduction, whereas calving BCS >/=3.5 (5-point scale) is associated with a reduction in early lactation dry matter intake and milk production and an increased risk of metabolic disorders. Ongoing research into the automation of body condition scoring suggests that it is a likely candidate to be incorporated into decision support systems in the near future to aid producers in making operational and tactical decisions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Colostrum Management for Dairy Calves

              Colostrum management is the single most important management factor in determining calf health and survival. Additional benefits of good colostrum management include improved rate of gain and future productivity. Successful colostrum management requires producers to provide calves with a sufficient volume of clean, high-quality colostrum within the first few hours of life. This article reviews the process of colostrogenesis and colostrum composition, and discusses key components in developing a successful colostrum management program. In addition, the article discusses approaches for monitoring and proposes new goals for passive immunity in dairy herds.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2764642/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/977881/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/442574/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/561889/overviewRole: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1905725/overviewRole: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1716552/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1135957/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Vet Sci
                Front Vet Sci
                Front. Vet. Sci.
                Frontiers in Veterinary Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-1769
                25 November 2024
                2024
                : 11
                : 1480851
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Division for Ruminants and Camelids, Unit for Internal Medicine and Surgery, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Farm Animal Clinic, Freie Universität Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                [2] 2Department of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Freie Universität Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                [3] 3Clinic for Cattle, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover , Foundation, Hannover, Germany
                [4] 4Department of Behavioral Physiology of Livestock, Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim , Stuttgart, Germany
                [5] 5Clinic for Ruminants with Ambulatory and Herd Health Services, Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich , Oberschleissheim, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Flaviana Gottardo, University of Padua, Italy

                Reviewed by: Barbara Contiero, University of Padua, Italy

                Florent Perrot, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse (ENVT), France

                *Correspondence: Kim K. Meier, kim.meier@ 123456fu-berlin.de

                These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

                Article
                10.3389/fvets.2024.1480851
                11625811
                39654838
                44ab4dcc-9a46-43d6-ae8c-86336a34889f
                Copyright © 2024 Meier, Stock, Merle, Arndt, Dachrodt, Hoedemaker, Kellermann, Knubben-Schweizer, Volkmann and Müller.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 14 August 2024
                : 28 October 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 9, Equations: 0, References: 62, Pages: 13, Words: 11551
                Funding
                The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Funding of this project was provided by the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture and Federal Office for Agriculture and Food, grant numbers 2814HS006 (University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation), 2814HS007 (Freie Universität Berlin), and 2814HS008 (Ludwig-Maximilian Universität Munich).
                Categories
                Veterinary Science
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Animal Behavior and Welfare

                omphalitis,risk factors,dairy calves,calving management,calf rearing,neonate

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content496

                Most referenced authors524