Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
61
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Start low, go fast? Antipsychotic titration patterns at an inpatient psychiatric hospital

      research-article
      , PharmD, BCPP 1 , , , PharmD candidate 2 , , PharmD candidate 3 , , PharmD candidate 4 , , PharmD candidate 5
      The Mental Health Clinician
      College of Psychiatric & Neurologic Pharmacists
      antipsychotic, titration, inpatient, psychiatry, hospital

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Antipsychotics are commonly used to treat psychotic symptoms and severe mental illnesses. Treatment guidelines recommend antipsychotics be titrated quickly to therapeutic effect in the acute setting but acknowledge that determining the optimal dose is complicated by a delay between treatment initiation and therapeutic response. The purpose of this study was to evaluate antipsychotic titration patterns in an inpatient psychiatric hospital.

          Methods

          This study is a retrospective chart review of adult patients admitted to a teaching hospital and initiated on an antipsychotic for treatment of psychosis between January and December 2018. Patients were excluded if they had substance-induced psychosis, delirium, were prescribed >1 antipsychotic, or had no antipsychotic dose changes. The primary outcome was the average titration rate of the newly initiated antipsychotic. Secondary outcomes included differences in titration rate between involuntary and voluntary admissions and other antipsychotic characteristics.

          Results

          Of 149 patients included, the majority had a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia. Antipsychotics were titrated on average every 2 days regardless of admission type. Eighteen percent of patients were titrated to guideline-recommended maximum doses, and it took, on average, 3 days for patients to reach their final dose during hospitalization. Average length of stay was 9 days, and 43.6% of patients were readmitted within 1 year.

          Discussion

          Antipsychotics are titrated rapidly in the inpatient setting despite a lack of evidence regarding the impact of titration rate on clinical outcomes. Further studies comparing slow versus rapid titration strategies are needed to elucidate the impact of this on patient outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Psychotropic medication non-adherence and its associated factors among patients with major psychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

          Background Major psychiatric disorders are growing public health concern that attributed 14% of the global burden of diseases. The management of major psychiatric disorders is challenging mainly due to medication non-adherence. However, there is a paucity of summarized evidence on the prevalence of psychotropic medication non-adherence and associated factors. Therefore, we aimed to summarize existing primary studies’ finding to determine the pooled prevalence and factors associated with psychotropic medication non-adherence. Methods A total of 4504 studies written in English until December 31, 2017, were searched from the main databases (n = 3125) (PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) and other relevant sources (mainly from Google Scholar, n = 1379). Study selection, screening, and data extraction were carried out independently by two authors. Observational studies that had been conducted among adult patients (18 years and older) with major psychiatric disorders were eligible for the selection process. Critical appraisal of the included studies was carried out using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Systematic synthesis of the studies was carried out to summarize factors associated with psychotropic medication non-adherence. Meta-analysis was carried using Stata 14. Random effects model was used to compute the pooled prevalence, and sub-group analysis at 95% confidence interval. Results Forty-six studies were included in the systematic review. Of these, 35 studies (schizophrenia (n = 9), depressive (n = 16), and bipolar (n = 10) disorders) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, 49% of major psychiatric disorder patients were non-adherent to their psychotropic medication. Of these, psychotropic medication non-adherence for schizophrenia, major depressive disorders, and bipolar disorders were 56%, 50%, and 44%, respectively. Individual patient’s behaviors, lack of social support, clinical or treatment and illness-related, and health system factors influenced psychotropic medication non-adherence. Conclusion Psychotropic medication non-adherence was high. It was influenced by various factors operating at different levels. Therefore, comprehensive intervention strategies should be designed to address factors associated with psychotropic medication non-adherence. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42017067436
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Antipsychotic medication in schizophrenia: a review.

            Antipsychotic medications are mainstays in the treatment of schizophrenia and a range of other psychotic disorders.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia, part 1: update 2012 on the acute treatment of schizophrenia and the management of treatment resistance.

              These updated guidelines are based on a first edition of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia published in 2005. For this 2012 revision, all available publications pertaining to the biological treatment of schizophrenia were reviewed systematically to allow for an evidence-based update. These guidelines provide evidence-based practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful and these guidelines are intended to be used by all physicians diagnosing and treating people suffering from schizophrenia. Based on the first version of these guidelines, a systematic review of the MEDLINE/PUBMED database and the Cochrane Library, in addition to data extraction from national treatment guidelines, has been performed for this update. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into six levels of evidence (A-F; Bandelow et al. 2008b, World J Biol Psychiatry 9:242). This first part of the updated guidelines covers the general descriptions of antipsychotics and their side effects, the biological treatment of acute schizophrenia and the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ment Health Clin
                Ment Health Clin
                mhcl
                The Mental Health Clinician
                College of Psychiatric & Neurologic Pharmacists
                2168-9709
                30 September 2020
                September 2020
                : 10
                : 5
                : 275-281
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Assistant Professor, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, Arizona; Assistant Professor, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, vadiei@ 123456pharmacy.arizona.edu
                [2 ]Student, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, Arizona
                [3 ]Student, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, Arizona
                [4 ]Student, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, Arizona
                [5 ]Student, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, Arizona
                Author notes

                Disclosures: This research did not receive any grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The authors also declare they have no conflicts of interest.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3984-0317
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6705-229X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0747-1329
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7709-9964
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6507-5730
                Article
                MHC-D-20-00023
                10.9740/mhc.2020.09.275
                7534816
                33062553
                42985b11-77b8-4fcc-a47f-990a65832f78
                © 2020 CPNP. The Mental Health Clinician is a publication of the College of Psychiatric and Neurologic Pharmacists.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Original Research

                antipsychotic,titration,inpatient,psychiatry,hospital
                antipsychotic, titration, inpatient, psychiatry, hospital

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content95

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors728