54
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Regulatory Considerations for the Clinical and Research Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): review and recommendations from an expert panel.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The field of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) has experienced significant growth in the past 15 years. One of the tES techniques leading this increased interest is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Significant research efforts have been devoted to determining the clinical potential of tDCS in humans. Despite the promising results obtained with tDCS in basic and clinical neuroscience, further progress has been impeded by a lack of clarity on international regulatory pathways. We therefore convened a group of research and clinician experts on tDCS to review the research and clinical use of tDCS. In this report, we review the regulatory status of tDCS, and we summarize the results according to research, off-label and compassionate use of tDCS in the following countries: Australia, Brazil, France, Germany, India, Iran, Italy, Portugal, South Korea, Taiwan and United States. Research use, off label treatment and compassionate use of tDCS are employed in most of the countries reviewed in this study. It is critical that a global or local effort is organized to pursue definite evidence to either approve and regulate or restrict the use of tDCS in clinical practice on the basis of adequate randomized controlled treatment trials.

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory.

          Previous studies have claimed that weak transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces persisting excitability changes in the human motor cortex that can be more pronounced than cortical modulation induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation, but there are no studies that have evaluated the effects of tDCS on working memory. Our aim was to determine whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, which enhances brain cortical excitability and activity, would modify performance in a sequential-letter working memory task when administered to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Fifteen subjects underwent a three-back working memory task based on letters. This task was performed during sham and anodal stimulation applied over the left DLPFC. Moreover seven of these subjects performed the same task, but with inverse polarity (cathodal stimulation of the left DLPFC) and anodal stimulation of the primary motor cortex (M1). Our results indicate that only anodal stimulation of the left prefrontal cortex, but not cathodal stimulation of left DLPFC or anodal stimulation of M1, increases the accuracy of the task performance when compared to sham stimulation of the same area. This accuracy enhancement during active stimulation cannot be accounted for by slowed responses, as response times were not changed by stimulation. Our results indicate that left prefrontal anodal stimulation leads to an enhancement of working memory performance. Furthermore, this effect depends on the stimulation polarity and is specific to the site of stimulation. This result may be helpful to develop future interventions aiming at clinical benefits.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Noninvasive human brain stimulation.

            Noninvasive brain stimulation with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is valuable in research and has potential therapeutic applications in cognitive neuroscience, neurophysiology, psychiatry, and neurology. TMS allows neurostimulation and neuromodulation, while tDCS is a purely neuromodulatory application. TMS and tDCS allow diagnostic and interventional neurophysiology applications, and focal neuropharmacology delivery. However, the physics and basic mechanisms of action remain incompletely explored. Following an overview of the history and current applications of noninvasive brain stimulation, we review stimulation device design principles, the electromagnetic and physical foundations of the techniques, and the current knowledge about the electrophysiologic basis of the effects. Finally, we discuss potential biomedical and electrical engineering developments that could lead to more effective stimulation devices, better suited for the specific applications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex.

              To induce prolonged motor cortical excitability reductions by transcranial direct current stimulation in the human. Cathodal direct current stimulation was applied transcranially to the hand area of the human primary motor cortex from 5 to 9 min in separate sessions in twelve healthy subjects. Cortico-spinal excitability was tested by single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. Transcranial electrical stimulation and H-reflexes were used to learn about the origin of the excitability changes. Neurone specific enolase was measured before and after the stimulation to prove the safety of the stimulation protocol. Five and 7 min direct current stimulation resulted in motor cortical excitability reductions, which lasted for minutes after the end of stimulation, 9 min stimulation induced after-effects for up to an hour after the end of stimulation, as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Muscle evoked potentials elicited by transcranial electric stimulation and H-reflexes did not change. Neurone specific enolase concentrations remained stable throughout the experiments. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation is capable of inducing prolonged excitability reductions in the human motor cortex non-invasively. These changes are most probably localised intracortically.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Res Regul Aff
                Clinical research and regulatory affairs
                1060-1333
                1060-1333
                Mar 1 2015
                : 32
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Spaulding Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
                [2 ] Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.
                [3 ] School of Psychiatry & The Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
                [4 ] Service of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil and Division of Neurology, Santa Casa Medicak School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
                [5 ] Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, and IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Roma, Italy.
                [6 ] Spaulding Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA ; Neuropsychophysiology Laboratory, CIPsi, School of Psychology (EPsi), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga, Portugal.
                [7 ] Department of Psychology, University of Milano Bicocca, and Laboratory of Neuropsychology, IRCC Instituto Auxologico Italiano, Milano, Italy.
                [8 ] Laboratory of Pain & Neuromodulation at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre at UFRGS.
                [9 ] Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
                [10 ] National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
                [11 ] Translational Neuroscience Program, Institute for Cognitive Science Studies, Tehran, Iran ; Neurocognitive Laboratory, Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
                [12 ] Electrical Geodesics, Inc., and University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
                [13 ] Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, and School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA USA.
                [14 ] EA 4615, Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier, Université de Lyon, F-69003, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Bron, France.
                [15 ] Department of Biomedical Engineering, Neural Engineering Laboratory, The City College of the City University of New York New York, NY, USA.
                [16 ] Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, National Central University, Taiwan.
                [17 ] Translational Psychiatry Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
                [18 ] Social and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory and Developmental Disorders Program, Center for Healthy and Biological Sciences, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
                Article
                NIHMS646440
                10.3109/10601333.2015.980944
                25983531
                425745de-d554-4ed9-b608-07b5239c0b8a
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article