27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Qualitative and quantitative evidence of motivation states for physical activity, exercise and being sedentary from university student focus groups

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Motivation for physical activity and sedentary behaviors (e.g., desires, urges, wants, cravings) varies from moment to moment. According to the WANT model, these motivation states may be affectively-charged (e.g., felt as tension), particularly after periods of maximal exercise or extended rest. The purpose of this study was to examine postulates of the WANT model utilizing a mixed-methods approach. We hypothesized that: (1) qualitative evidence would emerge from interviews to support this model, and (2) motivation states would quantitatively change over the course of an interview period. Seventeen undergraduate students (mean age = 18.6y, 13 women) engaged in focus groups where 12 structured questions were presented. Participants completed the “right now” version of the CRAVE scale before and after interviews. Qualitative data were analyzed with content analysis. A total of 410 unique lower-order themes were classified and grouped into 43 higher order themes (HOTs). From HOTs, six super higher order themes (SHOTs) were designated: (1) wants and aversions, (2) change and stability, (3) autonomy and automaticity, (4) objectives and impulses, (5) restraining and propelling forces, and (6) stress and boredom. Participants stated that they experienced desires to move and rest, including during the interview, but these states changed rapidly and varied both randomly as well as systematically across periods of minutes to months. Some also described a total absence of desire or even aversion to move and rest. Of note, strong urges and cravings for movement, typically from conditions of deprivation (e.g., sudden withdrawal from exercise training) were associated with physical and mental manifestations, such as fidgeting and feeling restless. Urges were often consummated with behavior (e.g., exercise sessions, naps), which commonly resulted in satiation and subsequent drop in desire. Importantly, stress was frequently described as both an inhibitor and instigator of motivation states. CRAVE-Move increased pre-to-post interviews ( p < .01). CRAVE-Rest demonstrated a trend to decline ( p = .057). Overall, qualitative and quantitative data largely corroborated postulates of the WANT model, demonstrating that people experience wants and cravings to move and rest, and that these states appear to fluctuate significantly, especially in the context of stress, boredom, satiety, and deprivation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references90

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

          Content analysis is a widely used qualitative research technique. Rather than being a single method, current applications of content analysis show three distinct approaches: conventional, directed, or summative. All three approaches are used to interpret meaning from the content of text data and, hence, adhere to the naturalistic paradigm. The major differences among the approaches are coding schemes, origins of codes, and threats to trustworthiness. In conventional content analysis, coding categories are derived directly from the text data. With a directed approach, analysis starts with a theory or relevant research findings as guidance for initial codes. A summative content analysis involves counting and comparisons, usually of keywords or content, followed by the interpretation of the underlying context. The authors delineate analytic procedures specific to each approach and techniques addressing trustworthiness with hypothetical examples drawn from the area of end-of-life care.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior

            Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction.

              This paper presents a biopsychological theory of drug addiction, the 'Incentive-Sensitization Theory'. The theory addresses three fundamental questions. The first is: why do addicts crave drugs? That is, what is the psychological and neurobiological basis of drug craving? The second is: why does drug craving persist even after long periods of abstinence? The third is whether 'wanting' drugs (drug craving) is attributable to 'liking' drugs (to the subjective pleasurable effects of drugs)? The theory posits the following. (1) Addictive drugs share the ability to enhance mesotelencephalic dopamine neurotransmission. (2) One psychological function of this neural system is to attribute 'incentive salience' to the perception and mental representation of events associated with activation of the system. Incentive salience is a psychological process that transforms the perception of stimuli, imbuing them with salience, making them attractive, 'wanted', incentive stimuli. (3) In some individuals the repeated use of addictive drugs produces incremental neuroadaptations in this neural system, rendering it increasingly and perhaps permanently, hypersensitive ('sensitized') to drugs and drug-associated stimuli. The sensitization of dopamine systems is gated by associative learning, which causes excessive incentive salience to be attributed to the act of drug taking and to stimuli associated with drug taking. It is specifically the sensitization of incentive salience, therefore, that transforms ordinary 'wanting' into excessive drug craving. (4) It is further proposed that sensitization of the neural systems responsible for incentive salience ('for wanting') can occur independently of changes in neural systems that mediate the subjective pleasurable effects of drugs (drug 'liking') and of neural systems that mediate withdrawal. Thus, sensitization of incentive salience can produce addictive behavior (compulsive drug seeking and drug taking) even if the expectation of drug pleasure or the aversive properties of withdrawal are diminished and even in the face of strong disincentives, including the loss of reputation, job, home and family. We review evidence for this view of addiction and discuss its implications for understanding the psychology and neurobiology of addiction.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Sports Act Living
                Front Sports Act Living
                Front. Sports Act. Living
                Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2624-9367
                21 March 2023
                2023
                : 5
                : 1033619
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Digestive Health Multispecialty Clinic, Yale New Haven Hospital , New Haven, CT, United States
                [ 2 ]Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College – Columbia University , New York, NY, United States
                [ 3 ]Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Northern Illinois University , Dekalb, IL, United States
                [ 4 ]Department of Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, Merrimack College , North Andover, MA, United States
                [ 5 ]Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University , Durham, NC, United States
                [ 6 ]Yale Stress Center, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, United States
                [ 7 ]Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin , Austin, TX, United States
                [ 8 ]Faculty of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences, Universidad de León , León, Spain
                [ 9 ]Department of Psychology, Southern Connecticut State University , New Haven, CT, United States
                [ 10 ]Connecticut Community Colleges Nursing Program, Gateway Community College , New Haven, CT, United States
                [ 11 ]Center for Medical Informatics, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, United States
                [ 12 ]Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, MN, United States
                [ 13 ]Center for Pain, Research, Informatics, Medical Comorbidities and Education Center (PRIME), VA Connecticut Healthcare System , West Haven, CT, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Sergio Machado, Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil

                Reviewed by: Carlos Verardi, São Paulo State University, Brazil Vinicius Hirota, Guarulhos University, Brazil

                [* ] Correspondence: Matthew Stults-Kolehmainen matthew.stults@ 123456ynhh.org
                [ † ]

                These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

                Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Movement Science and Sport Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Sports and Active Living

                Article
                10.3389/fspor.2023.1033619
                10071436
                37025458
                41ab68e9-b9da-4e14-a0bb-8bfaffc31d8f
                © 2023 Stults-Kolehmainen, Gilson, SantaBarbara, McKee, Sinha, Bartholomew, Boullosa, Budnick, Bueno, Haughton, Barker and Ash.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 31 August 2022
                : 07 February 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 5, Equations: 0, References: 93, Pages: 0, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: Office of Academic Affiliations at the United States Veterans Health Administration, a Robert E. Leet and Clara Guthrie Patterson Trust Mentored Research Award, Bank of America, N.A., Trustee, and American Heart Association
                Award ID: #852679 (GA, 2021–2024)
                Funded by: DB, doi 10.13039/100015870;
                Award ID: RYC2021-031098-I
                GA was supported by a fellowship from the Office of Academic Affiliations at the United States Veterans Health Administration, a Robert E. Leet and Clara Guthrie Patterson Trust Mentored Research Award, Bank of America, N.A., Trustee, and American Heart Association Grant #852679 (GA, 2021–2024). DB was supported by Grant RYC2021-031098-I funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, by “European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR”, and by a productivity research grant (PQ1D) from CNPq (Brazil).
                Categories
                Sports and Active Living
                Original Research

                motivation,motivation states,desires,physical activity,exercise,qualitative study,focus groups,stress

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content24

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors1,058