5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      A Quantitative Severity Scale for Retinopathy of Prematurity Using Deep Learning to Monitor Disease Regression After Treatment

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Can a quantitative measurement of retinopathy of prematurity severity be used over time to monitor disease regression after treatment? In this cohort study of at-risk infants using data collected for the Imaging and Informatics in Retinopathy of Prematurity study, the quantitative retinopathy of prematurity vascular severity score developed using an automated deep learning–based plus disease classifier consistently reflected clinical disease posttreatment regression in 46 included eyes with laser or bevacizumab treatment. Tracking quantitative measurements of retinopathy of prematurity severity may be an effective method of following disease regression and identifying patients at risk for recurrence after retinopathy of prematurity treatment. Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide, but treatment failure and disease recurrence are important causes of adverse outcomes in patients with treatment-requiring ROP (TR-ROP). To apply an automated ROP vascular severity score obtained using a deep learning algorithm and to assess its utility for objectively monitoring ROP regression after treatment. This retrospective cohort study used data from the Imaging and Informatics in ROP consortium, which comprises 9 tertiary referral centers in North America that screen high volumes of at-risk infants for ROP. Images of 5255 clinical eye examinations from 871 infants performed between July 2011 and December 2016 were assessed for eligibility in the present study. The disease course was assessed with time across the numerous examinations for patients with TR-ROP. Infants born prematurely meeting screening criteria for ROP who developed TR-ROP and who had images captured within 4 weeks before and after treatment as well as at the time of treatment were included. The primary outcome was mean (SD) ROP vascular severity score before, at time of, and after treatment. A deep learning classifier was used to assign a continuous ROP vascular severity score, which ranged from 1 (normal) to 9 (most severe), at each examination. A secondary outcome was the difference in ROP vascular severity score among eyes treated with laser or the vascular endothelial growth factor antagonist bevacizumab. Differences between groups for both outcomes were assessed using unpaired 2-tailed t tests with Bonferroni correction. Of 5255 examined eyes, 91 developed TR-ROP, of which 46 eyes met the inclusion criteria based on the available images. The mean (SD) birth weight of those patients was 653 (185) g, with a mean (SD) gestational age of 24.9 (1.3) weeks. The mean (SD) ROP vascular severity scores significantly increased 2 weeks prior to treatment (4.19 [1.75]), peaked at treatment (7.43 [1.89]), and decreased for at least 2 weeks after treatment (4.00 [1.88]) (all P  < .001). Eyes requiring retreatment with laser had higher ROP vascular severity scores at the time of initial treatment compared with eyes receiving a single treatment ( P  < .001). This quantitative ROP vascular severity score appears to consistently reflect clinical disease progression and posttreatment regression in eyes with TR-ROP. These study results may have implications for the monitoring of patients with ROP for treatment failure and disease recurrence and for determining the appropriate level of disease severity for primary treatment in eyes with aggressive disease. This cohort study uses clinical images collected for the Imaging and Informatics in Retinopathy of Prematurity consortium to assess whether an automated retinopathy of prematurity vascular severity score obtained from a deep learning–based algorithm plus disease classifier can objectively monitor disease progression and regression after treatment among infants with treatment-requiring disease.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Revised indications for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity: results of the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity randomized trial.

          To determine whether earlier treatment using ablation of the avascular retina in high-risk prethreshold retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) results in improved grating visual acuity and retinal structural outcomes compared with conventional treatment. Infants with bilateral high-risk prethreshold ROP (n = 317) had one eye randomized to early treatment with the fellow eye managed conventionally (control eye). In asymmetric cases (n = 84), the eye with high-risk prethreshold ROP was randomized to early treatment or conventional management. High risk was determined using a model based on the Multicenter Trial of Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity natural history cohort. At a corrected age of 9 months, visual acuity was assessed by masked testers using the Teller acuity card procedure. At corrected ages of 6 and 9 months, eyes were examined for structural outcome. Outcomes for the 2 treatment groups of eyes were compared using chi2 analysis, combining data for bilateral and asymmetric cases. Grating acuity results showed a reduction in unfavorable visual acuity outcomes with earlier treatment, from 19.5% to 14.5% (P =.01). Unfavorable structural outcomes were reduced from 15.6% to 9.1% (P<.001) at 9 months. Further analysis supported retinal ablative therapy for eyes with type 1 ROP, defined as zone I, any stage ROP with plus disease (a degree of dilation and tortuosity of the posterior retinal blood vessels meeting or exceeding that of a standard photograph); zone I, stage 3 ROP without plus disease; or zone II, stage 2 or 3 ROP with plus disease. The analysis supported a wait-and-watch approach to type 2 ROP, defined as zone I, stage 1 or 2 ROP without plus disease or zone II, stage 3 ROP without plus disease. These eyes should be considered for treatment only if they progress to type 1 or threshold ROP. Early treatment of high-risk prethreshold ROP significantly reduced unfavorable outcomes to a clinically important degree. Additional analyses led to modified recommendations for the use of peripheral retinal ablation in eyes with ROP. Long-term follow-up is being conducted to learn whether the benefits noted in the first year after birth will persist into childhood.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab for stage 3+ retinopathy of prematurity.

            Retinopathy of prematurity is a leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide. Peripheral retinal ablation with conventional (confluent) laser therapy is destructive, causes complications, and does not prevent all vision loss, especially in cases of retinopathy of prematurity affecting zone I of the eye. Case series in which patients were treated with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors suggest that these agents may be useful in treating retinopathy of prematurity. We conducted a prospective, controlled, randomized, stratified, multicenter trial to assess intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy for zone I or zone II posterior stage 3+ (i.e., stage 3 with plus disease) retinopathy of prematurity. Infants were randomly assigned to receive intravitreal bevacizumab (0.625 mg in 0.025 ml of solution) or conventional laser therapy, bilaterally. The primary ocular outcome was recurrence of retinopathy of prematurity in one or both eyes requiring retreatment before 54 weeks' postmenstrual age. We enrolled 150 infants (total sample of 300 eyes); 143 infants survived to 54 weeks' postmenstrual age, and the 7 infants who died were not included in the primary-outcome analyses. Retinopathy of prematurity recurred in 4 infants in the bevacizumab group (6 of 140 eyes [4%]) and 19 infants in the laser-therapy group (32 of 146 eyes [22%], P=0.002). A significant treatment effect was found for zone I retinopathy of prematurity (P=0.003) but not for zone II disease (P=0.27). Intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy, as compared with conventional laser therapy, in infants with stage 3+ retinopathy of prematurity showed a significant benefit for zone I but not zone II disease. Development of peripheral retinal vessels continued after treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab, but conventional laser therapy led to permanent destruction of the peripheral retina. This trial was too small to assess safety. (Funded by Research to Prevent Blindness and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00622726.).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Retinopathy of prematurity: a global perspective of the epidemics, population of babies at risk and implications for control.

              Globally at least 50,000 children are blind from retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) which is now a significant cause of blindness in many middle income countries in Latin American and Eastern Europe. Retinopathy of prematurity is also being reported from the emerging economies of India and China. The characteristics of babies developing severe disease varies, with babies in middle and low income countries having a much wider range of birth weights and gestational ages than is currently the case in industrialized countries. Rates of disease requiring treatment also tend to be higher in middle and low income countries suggesting that babies are being exposed to risk factors which are, to a large extent, being controlled in industrialised countries. The reasons for this "third epidemic" of ROP are discussed as well as strategies for control, including the need for locally relevant, evidence based criteria which ensure that all babies at risk are examined.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Ophthalmology
                JAMA Ophthalmol
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                2168-6165
                September 01 2019
                September 01 2019
                : 137
                : 9
                : 1029
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
                [2 ]Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown
                [3 ]Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago
                [4 ]Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts
                [5 ]Massachusetts General Hospital & Brigham and Women’s Hospital Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston
                [6 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                [7 ]Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
                Article
                10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.2442
                6613298
                31268499
                40844b4a-700f-4a7f-915f-521994e98fb1
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article