29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      How Do the Nurses Cope with Job Stress? A Study with Grounded Theory Approach

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction: Due to the adverse effects of job stress on health of nurses and the importance of coping process of nurses in management of job stress, the present study was carried out with the aim of exploring the experiences of the nurses in order to reveal the original coping process of the nurses in the case of encountering occupational stress.

          Methods: This qualitative study was conducted with grounded theory approach. Research participants were 15 clinical nurses and four directors of nursing. Sampling method of study were purposive and theoretical sampling. Data collection done with unstructured interviews and field notes and continued until data saturation. Data analysis was performed using the Strauss and Corbin 1998 constant comparative method.

          Results: The results of the analysis led to four axial concepts: "feeling stress at nursing work", "situational coping", "and the effect of personal and environmental factors in coping with job stress" and "Grey outcome of coping". The core variable in the nurse’s process of coping with job stress was "comprehensive effort to calm stressed condition".

          Conclusion: Explaining the basic and original psychosocial process of nurses to cope with job stress, revealed context-based nature of the coping processes that nurses adopt, which that can help in taking appropriate measures to lighten up the grey consequences of coping of nurses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Book: not found

          Basics of Qualitative Research : Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory

          The Second Edition of this best-selling textbook continues to offer immensely practical advice and technical expertise that will aid researchers in analyzing and interpreting their collected data, and ultimately build theory from it. The authors provide a step-by-step guide to the research act. Full of definitions and illustrative examples, the book presents criteria for evaluating a study as well as responses to common questions posed by students of qualitative research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Searching for the structure of coping: a review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping.

            From analyzing 100 assessments of coping, the authors critiqued strategies and identified best practices for constructing category systems. From current systems, a list of 400 ways of coping was compiled. For constructing lower order categories, the authors concluded that confirmatory factor analysis should replace the 2 most common strategies (exploratory factor analysis and rational sorting). For higher order categories, they recommend that the 3 most common distinctions (problem- vs. emotion-focused, approach vs. avoidance, and cognitive vs. behavioral) no longer be used. Instead, the authors recommend hierarchical systems of action types (e.g., proximity seeking, accommodation). From analysis of 6 such systems, 13 potential core families of coping were identified. Future steps involve deciding how to organize these families, using their functional homogeneity and distinctiveness, and especially their links to adaptive processes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Occupational stress, job characteristics, coping, and the mental health of nurses.

               This study investigated the relationships between job characteristics and coping in predicting levels of anxiety and depression in nurses. The study was based on current theories of occupational stress, and predictors included job demands, social support, decision authority and skill discretion control, effort, over-commitment, rewards, and ways of coping. It was predicted that job demands, extrinsic effort, over-commitment, and negative coping behaviours would be positively associated with depression and anxiety, and social support, rewards, decision authority, skill discretion control, and positive coping would be negatively associated with depression and anxiety.  Participants were 870 nurses, who responded to a bulk mail sent randomly to 4,000 nurses from the south of England.  The results showed that job demands, extrinsic effort, and over-commitment were associated with higher levels of anxiety and depression. Social support, rewards, and skill discretion were negatively associated with mental health problems. Few interactions were found between the variables. Coping behaviours significantly added to the explanation of variance in anxiety and depression outcomes, over and above the use of demand-control-support, and effort-reward factors alone.  The results from the study demonstrated the importance of coping factors in work-stress research, in accordance with the multi-factorial premise of transactional stress models. It is argued that multi-factor research is needed to help develop effective organizational interventions. © 2011 The British Psychological Society.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Caring Sci
                J Caring Sci
                J Caring Sci
                JCS
                TBZMED
                Journal of Caring Sciences
                Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
                2251-9920
                September 2017
                01 September 2017
                : 6
                : 3
                : 199-211
                Affiliations
                1Department of Nursing, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
                2Nursing Care Research Center in Chronic Disease, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
                3Department of Nursing, Medical Sciences Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
                4Department of Nursing, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding Author: Nasrin Elahi (PhD), email: elahi-n@ 123456ajums.ac.ir . This study was approved and funded by the deputy of research of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (Project number: 61357-15794).
                Article
                10.15171/jcs.2017.020
                5618945
                28971071
                402b7550-0be6-4af6-994a-499951d7142d
                © 2017 by The Author(s)

                This work is published by Journal of Caring Sciences as an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 25 September 2016
                : 17 January 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 1, References: 30, Pages: 13
                Categories
                Original Article

                stress, psychological,nurses,grounded theory
                stress, psychological, nurses, grounded theory

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content713

                Cited by8

                Most referenced authors237