1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Preexisting autoantibodies as predictor of immune related adverse events (irAEs) for advanced solid tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now standard of care in many cancers. They can generate immune-related adverse events (irAEs), but no biomarkers are available to identify patients who are more likely to develop irAEs. We assess the association between pre-existing autoantibodies and occurrence of irAEs. Patients and Methods: We prospectively collected data from consecutive patients receiving ICIs for advanced cancers, in a single center between May 2015 and July 2021. Autoantibodies testing was performed before ICIs initiation including AntiNeutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies, Antinuclear Antibodies, Rheumatoid Factor anti-Thyroid Peroxidase and anti-Thyroglobulin. We analyzed the associations of pre-existing autoantibodies with onset, severity, time to irAEs and with survival outcomes. Results: Of the 221 patients included, most had renal cell carcinoma (n = 99; 45%) or lung carcinoma (n = 90; 41%). Grade ≥2 irAEs were more frequent among patients with pre-existing autoantibodies: 64 (50%) vs. 20 (22%) patients (Odds-Ratio= 3.5 [95% CI=1.8-6.8]; p < 0.001) in the positive vs negative group, respectively. irAEs occurred earlier in the positive group with a median time interval between ICI initiation and irAE of 13 weeks (IQR = 8.8-21.6) vs. 28.5 weeks (IQR=10.6-55.1) in the negative group (p = 0.01). Twelve patients (9.4%) experienced multiple (≥2) irAEs in the positive group vs. 2 (2%) in the negative group (OR = 4.5 [95% CI: 0.98-36], p = 0.04). After a median follow-up of 25 months, median PFS and OS were significantly longer among patients experiencing irAE (p = 0.00034 and p = 0.016, respectively). Conclusion: The presence of pre-existing autoantibodies is significantly associated with the occurrence of grade ≥2 irAEs, with earlier and multiple irAEs in patients treated with ICIs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

          Purpose To increase awareness, outline strategies, and offer guidance on the recommended management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi) therapy. Methods A multidisciplinary, multi-organizational panel of experts in medical oncology, dermatology, gastroenterology, rheumatology, pulmonology, endocrinology, urology, neurology, hematology, emergency medicine, nursing, trialist, and advocacy was convened to develop the clinical practice guideline. Guideline development involved a systematic review of the literature and an informal consensus process. The systematic review focused on guidelines, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and case series published from 2000 through 2017. Results The systematic review identified 204 eligible publications. Much of the evidence consisted of systematic reviews of observational data, consensus guidelines, case series, and case reports. Due to the paucity of high-quality evidence on management of immune-related adverse events, recommendations are based on expert consensus. Recommendations Recommendations for specific organ system-based toxicity diagnosis and management are presented. While management varies according to organ system affected, in general, ICPi therapy should be continued with close monitoring for grade 1 toxicities, with the exception of some neurologic, hematologic, and cardiac toxicities. ICPi therapy may be suspended for most grade 2 toxicities, with consideration of resuming when symptoms revert to grade 1 or less. Corticosteroids may be administered. Grade 3 toxicities generally warrant suspension of ICPis and the initiation of high-dose corticosteroids (prednisone 1 to 2 mg/kg/d or methylprednisolone 1 to 2 mg/kg/d). Corticosteroids should be tapered over the course of at least 4 to 6 weeks. Some refractory cases may require infliximab or other immunosuppressive therapy. In general, permanent discontinuation of ICPis is recommended with grade 4 toxicities, with the exception of endocrinopathies that have been controlled by hormone replacement. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Fatal Toxic Effects Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

            Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now a mainstay of cancer treatment. Although rare, fulminant and fatal toxic effects may complicate these otherwise transformative therapies; characterizing these events requires integration of global data.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Safety profiles of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies alone and in combination.

              Inhibition of immune checkpoints using anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or anti cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibodies has revolutionized the management of patients with advanced-stage melanoma and is among the most promising treatment approaches for many other cancers. Use of CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors, either as single agents, or in combination, has been approved by the US FDA for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Treatment with these novel immunotherapies results in a unique and distinct spectrum of adverse events, which are mostly related to activation of the immune system and are, therefore, an unwanted consequence of their mechanisms of action. Adverse effects of CTLA-4 and/or PD-1 inhibition are most commonly observed in the skin, gastrointestinal tract, liver and endocrine systems and include pruritus, rash, nausea, diarrhoea and thyroid disorders. In this Review, the authors describe the adverse event profile of checkpoint inhibitors targeting CTLA-4 and PD-1, used both as monotherapies and in combination and aim to provide some general guidelines, based upon the mechanisms of action of these therapies and on the management of these immune-related adverse events.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Oncoimmunology
                Oncoimmunology
                Oncoimmunology
                Taylor & Francis
                2162-4011
                2162-402X
                11 May 2023
                2023
                11 May 2023
                : 12
                : 1
                : 2204754
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP.Centre – Université Paris Cité; , Paris, France
                [b ]Department of Immunology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP.Centre – Université Paris Cité; , Paris, France
                [c ]ARTIC - Association pour la Recherche de Thérapeutiques Innovantes en Cancérologie; Hǒpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP. Centre – Université Paris Cité; , Paris, France
                [d ]INSERM U970, PARCC, Université Paris-Cité; , Paris, France
                [e ]Department of Pharmacovigilance, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP.Centre – Université Paris Cité; , Paris, France
                [f ]Department of Internal Medicine, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP.Centre – Université Paris Cité; , Paris, France
                [g ]Department of Clinical Immunology, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, AP-HP.Centre – Université Paris Cité; , Paris, France
                [h ]Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou; , Paris, France
                [i ]Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Sorbonne Université; , Paris, France
                Author notes
                CONTACT A. Simonaggio audrey.simonaggio@ 123456aphp.fr Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP. Centre – Université Paris Cité; , Paris 75015, France
                [*]

                These authors should be considered equally as first coauthors.

                [¤]

                These authors should be considered equally as co-senior authors.

                Article
                2204754
                10.1080/2162402X.2023.2204754
                10177742
                37187974
                401ae45e-cd5c-4234-9125-587b6ef56470
                © 2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, References: 25, Pages: 1
                Categories
                Research Article
                Original Research

                Immunology
                immune checkpoint inhibitors,immune-related adverse events,pre-existing antibodies

                Comments

                Comment on this article