Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Band Structure Engineering and Orbital Orientation Control Constructing Dual Active Sites for Efficient Sulfur Redox Reaction

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The kinetics difference among multistep electrochemical processes leads to the accumulation of soluble polysulfides and thus shuttle effect in lithium−sulfur (Li−S) batteries. While the interaction between catalysts and representative species has been reported, the root of the kinetics difference, interaction change among redox reactions, remains unclear, which significantly impedes the catalysts design for Li−S batteries. Here, this work deciphers the interaction change among electrocatalytic sulfur reactions, using tungsten disulfide (WS 2) a model system to demonstrate the efficiency of modifying electrocatalytic selectivity via dual‐coordination design. Band structure engineering and orbital orientation control are combined to guide the design of WS 2 with boron dopants and sulfur vacancies (B−WS 2− x ), accurately modulating interaction with lithium and sulfur sites in polysulfide species for relatively higher interaction with short‐chain polysulfides. The modified interaction trend is experimentally confirmed by distinguishing the kinetics of each electrochemical reaction step, indicating the effectiveness of the designed strategy. An Ah‐level pouch cell with B−WS 2− x delivers a gravimetric energy density of up to 417.6 Wh kg −1 with a low electrolyte/sulfur ratio of 3.6 µL mg −1 and negative/positive ratio of 1.2. This work presents a dual‐coordination strategy for advancing evolutionarily catalytic activity, offering a rational strategy to develop effective catalysts for practical Li−S batteries.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage.

          Li-ion batteries have transformed portable electronics and will play a key role in the electrification of transport. However, the highest energy storage possible for Li-ion batteries is insufficient for the long-term needs of society, for example, extended-range electric vehicles. To go beyond the horizon of Li-ion batteries is a formidable challenge; there are few options. Here we consider two: Li-air (O(2)) and Li-S. The energy that can be stored in Li-air (based on aqueous or non-aqueous electrolytes) and Li-S cells is compared with Li-ion; the operation of the cells is discussed, as are the significant hurdles that will have to be overcome if such batteries are to succeed. Fundamental scientific advances in understanding the reactions occurring in the cells as well as new materials are key to overcoming these obstacles. The potential benefits of Li-air and Li-S justify the continued research effort that will be needed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Catalytic oxidation of Li2S on the surface of metal sulfides for Li-S batteries.

            Polysulfide binding and trapping to prevent dissolution into the electrolyte by a variety of materials has been well studied in Li-S batteries. Here we discover that some of those materials can play an important role as an activation catalyst to facilitate oxidation of the discharge product, Li2S, back to the charge product, sulfur. Combining theoretical calculations and experimental design, we select a series of metal sulfides as a model system to identify the key parameters in determining the energy barrier for Li2S oxidation and polysulfide adsorption. We demonstrate that the Li2S decomposition energy barrier is associated with the binding between isolated Li ions and the sulfur in sulfides; this is the main reason that sulfide materials can induce lower overpotential compared with commonly used carbon materials. Fundamental understanding of this reaction process is a crucial step toward rational design and screening of materials to achieve high reversible capacity and long cycle life in Li-S batteries.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mechanism and Kinetics of Li2S Precipitation in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries.

              The kinetics of Li2 S electrodeposition onto carbon in lithium-sulfur batteries are characterized. Electrodeposition is found to be dominated by a 2D nucleation and growth process with rate constants that depend strongly on the electrolyte solvent. Nucleation is found to require a greater overpotential than growth, which results in a morphology that is dependent on the discharge rate.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Advanced Materials
                Advanced Materials
                Wiley
                0935-9648
                1521-4095
                January 2024
                November 29 2023
                January 2024
                : 36
                : 2
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Shenzhen Geim Graphene Center Tsinghua‐Berkeley Shenzhen Institute & Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School Tsinghua University Shenzhen 518055 P. R. China
                Article
                10.1002/adma.202309024
                37848387
                3db26f29-b14b-4e1a-b5e3-eb05dbfe8615
                © 2024

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article