0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical and functional outcomes for risk‐appropriate treatments for prostate cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To describe real‐world clinical and functional outcomes in an Australian cohort of men with localised prostate cancer according to treatment type and risk category.

          Subjects and methods

          Men diagnosed from 2008 to 2018 who were enrolled in South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative registry—a multi‐institutional prospective clinical registry—were studied. The main outcome measures were overall survival, cancer‐specific survival, decline in functional outcomes, biochemical recurrence and transition to active treatment following active surveillance. Multivariable adjusted models were applied to estimate outcomes.

          Results

          Of the 8513 eligible men, majority of men (46%) underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) followed by external beam radiation therapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy (EBRT +/− ADT) in 22% of the cohort. Five‐year overall survival was above 91%, and 5‐year prostate cancer‐specific survival was above 97% in the low‐ and intermediate‐risk categories across all treatments. Five‐year prostate cancer‐specific survival in the active surveillance group was 100%. About 37% of men with high‐risk disease treated with RP and 17% of men treated with EBRT +/− ADT experienced biochemical recurrence within 5 years of treatment. Of men on active surveillance, 15% of those with low risk and 20% with intermediate risk converted to active treatment within 2 years. The decline in urinary continence and sexual function 12 months after treatment was greatest among men who underwent RP while the decline in bowel function was greatest for men who received EBRT +/− ADT.

          Conclusion

          This contemporary real‐world evidence on risk‐appropriate treatment outcomes helps inform treatment decision‐making for clinicians and patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference.

          In 1996 the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) sponsored a Consensus Conference to establish a definition of biochemical failure after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). The ASTRO definition defined prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure as occurring after three consecutive PSA rises after a nadir with the date of failure as the point halfway between the nadir date and the first rise or any rise great enough to provoke initiation of therapy. This definition was not linked to clinical progression or survival; it performed poorly in patients undergoing hormonal therapy (HT), and backdating biased the Kaplan-Meier estimates of event-free survival. A second Consensus Conference was sponsored by ASTRO and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group in Phoenix, Arizona, on January 21, 2005, to revise the ASTRO definition. The panel recommended: (1) a rise by 2 ng/mL or more above the nadir PSA be considered the standard definition for biochemical failure after EBRT with or without HT; (2) the date of failure be determined "at call" (not backdated). They recommended that investigators be allowed to use the ASTRO Consensus Definition after EBRT alone (no hormonal therapy) with strict adherence to guidelines as to "adequate follow-up." To avoid the artifacts resulting from short follow-up, the reported date of control should be listed as 2 years short of the median follow-up. For example, if the median follow-up is 5 years, control rates at 3 years should be cited. Retaining a strict version of the ASTRO definition would allow comparisons with a large existing body of literature.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.

            Background The comparative effectiveness of treatments for prostate cancer that is detected by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing remains uncertain. Methods We compared active monitoring, radical prostatectomy, and external-beam radiotherapy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Between 1999 and 2009, a total of 82,429 men 50 to 69 years of age received a PSA test; 2664 received a diagnosis of localized prostate cancer, and 1643 agreed to undergo randomization to active monitoring (545 men), surgery (553), or radiotherapy (545). The primary outcome was prostate-cancer mortality at a median of 10 years of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the rates of disease progression, metastases, and all-cause deaths. Results There were 17 prostate-cancer-specific deaths overall: 8 in the active-monitoring group (1.5 deaths per 1000 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7 to 3.0), 5 in the surgery group (0.9 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.2), and 4 in the radiotherapy group (0.7 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 0.3 to 2.0); the difference among the groups was not significant (P=0.48 for the overall comparison). In addition, no significant difference was seen among the groups in the number of deaths from any cause (169 deaths overall; P=0.87 for the comparison among the three groups). Metastases developed in more men in the active-monitoring group (33 men; 6.3 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 4.5 to 8.8) than in the surgery group (13 men; 2.4 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.2) or the radiotherapy group (16 men; 3.0 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.9 to 4.9) (P=0.004 for the overall comparison). Higher rates of disease progression were seen in the active-monitoring group (112 men; 22.9 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 19.0 to 27.5) than in the surgery group (46 men; 8.9 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 6.7 to 11.9) or the radiotherapy group (46 men; 9.0 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 6.7 to 12.0) (P<0.001 for the overall comparison). Conclusions At a median of 10 years, prostate-cancer-specific mortality was low irrespective of the treatment assigned, with no significant difference among treatments. Surgery and radiotherapy were associated with lower incidences of disease progression and metastases than was active monitoring. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research; ProtecT Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN20141297 ; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02044172 .).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Diagnosis and Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Review.

              Prostate cancer is the most common cancer diagnosis made in men with more than 160 000 new cases each year in the United States. Although it often has an indolent course, prostate cancer remains the third-leading cause of cancer death in men.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                tenaw.tiruye@unisa.edu.au
                Journal
                BJUI Compass
                BJUI Compass
                10.1002/(ISSN)2688-4526
                BCO2
                BJUI Compass
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2688-4526
                12 September 2023
                January 2024
                : 5
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1002/bco2.v5.1 )
                : 109-120
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human Performance University of South Australia Adelaide Australia
                [ 2 ] Public Health Department Debre Markos University Debre Markos Ethiopia
                [ 3 ] South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative Adelaide Australia
                [ 4 ] Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute Flinders University Adelaide Australia
                [ 5 ] Discipline of Medicine University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia
                [ 6 ] Flinders Medical Centre Bedford Park Australia
                [ 7 ] Health Policy Centre South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute Adelaide Australia
                [ 8 ] School of Public Health University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia
                [ 9 ] Discipline of Surgery University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia
                [ 10 ] Department of Radiation Oncology Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide Australia
                [ 11 ] Southern Adelaide Local Health Network Adelaide Australia
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Tenaw Tiruye, Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.

                Email: tenaw.tiruye@ 123456unisa.edu.au

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1156-3426
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5038-5859
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7928-9692
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9798-1479
                Article
                BCO2288
                10.1002/bco2.288
                10764171
                3d0145ea-ac29-41a8-be13-a90942ff03d8
                © 2023 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 14 August 2023
                : 28 June 2023
                : 15 August 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Pages: 12, Words: 7597
                Funding
                Funded by: Hospital Research Foundation , doi 10.13039/100009727;
                Award ID: C‐PJ‐09‐Prost‐2020
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                January 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.6 mode:remove_FC converted:03.01.2024

                biochemical recurrence,health outcomes,prostate cancer,quality of life,survival

                Comments

                Comment on this article