3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Socioeconomic status and the structure of the self‐concept

      1 , 2 , 3
      British Journal of Social Psychology
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification.

          Recent research shows individuals' identification with in-groups to be psychologically important and socially consequential. However, there is little agreement about how identification should be conceptualized or measured. On the basis of previous work, the authors identified 5 specific components of in-group identification and offered a hierarchical 2-dimensional model within which these components are organized. Studies 1 and 2 used confirmatory factor analysis to validate the proposed model of self-definition (individual self-stereotyping, in-group homogeneity) and self-investment (solidarity, satisfaction, and centrality) dimensions, across 3 different group identities. Studies 3 and 4 demonstrated the construct validity of the 5 components by examining their (concurrent) correlations with established measures of in-group identification. Studies 5-7 demonstrated the predictive and discriminant validity of the 5 components by examining their (prospective) prediction of individuals' orientation to, and emotions about, real intergroup relations. Together, these studies illustrate the conceptual and empirical value of a hierarchical multicomponent model of in-group identification.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: how the rich are different from the poor.

            Social class is shaped by an individual's material resources as well as perceptions of rank vis-à-vis others in society, and in this article, we examine how class influences behavior. Diminished resources and lower rank create contexts that constrain social outcomes for lower-class individuals and enhance contextualist tendencies--that is, a focus on external, uncontrollable social forces and other individuals who influence one's life outcomes. In contrast, abundant resources and elevated rank create contexts that enhance the personal freedoms of upper-class individuals and give rise to solipsistic social cognitive tendencies--that is, an individualistic focus on one's own internal states, goals, motivations, and emotions. Guided by this framework, we detail 9 hypotheses and relevant empirical evidence concerning how class-based contextualist and solipsistic tendencies shape the self, perceptions of the social environment, and relationships to other individuals. Novel predictions and implications for research in other socio-political contexts are considered. Copyright 2012 APA, all rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              An Empirical Investigation of Self-Attitudes

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                British Journal of Social Psychology
                Br. J. Soc. Psychol.
                Wiley
                0144-6665
                2044-8309
                March 18 2019
                January 2020
                June 07 2019
                January 2020
                : 59
                : 1
                : 66-86
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Psychology University of Sussex Brighton UK
                [2 ]Faculty of Behavioural Sciences University of Groningen The Netherlands
                [3 ]School of Psychology Cardiff University UK
                Article
                10.1111/bjso.12334
                31175690
                3ccd3bb9-cfb5-4baf-9cd4-ae2cc664bdb2
                © 2020

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article