14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Global Succulent Biome phylogenetic conservatism across the pantropical Caesalpinia Group (Leguminosae)

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 5 , 4
      New Phytologist
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species.

          Ecologists are increasingly adopting an evolutionary perspective, and in recent years, the idea that closely related species are ecologically similar has become widespread. In this regard, phylogenetic signal must be distinguished from phylogenetic niche conservatism. Phylogenetic niche conservatism results when closely related species are more ecologically similar that would be expected based on their phylogenetic relationships; its occurrence suggests that some process is constraining divergence among closely related species. In contrast, phylogenetic signal refers to the situation in which ecological similarity between species is related to phylogenetic relatedness; this is the expected outcome of Brownian motion divergence and thus is necessary, but not sufficient, evidence for the existence of phylogenetic niche conservatism. Although many workers consider phylogenetic niche conservatism to be common, a review of case studies indicates that ecological and phylogenetic similarities often are not related. Consequently, ecologists should not assume that phylogenetic niche conservatism exists, but rather should empirically examine the extent to which it occurs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Detecting Correlated Evolution on Phylogenies: A General Method for the Comparative Analysis of Discrete Characters

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Recent assembly of the Cerrado, a neotropical plant diversity hotspot, by in situ evolution of adaptations to fire.

              The relative importance of local ecological and larger-scale historical processes in causing differences in species richness across the globe remains keenly debated. To gain insight into these questions, we investigated the assembly of plant diversity in the Cerrado in South America, the world's most species-rich tropical savanna. Time-calibrated phylogenies suggest that Cerrado lineages started to diversify less than 10 Mya, with most lineages diversifying at 4 Mya or less, coinciding with the rise to dominance of flammable C4 grasses and expansion of the savanna biome worldwide. These plant phylogenies show that Cerrado lineages are strongly associated with adaptations to fire and have sister groups in largely fire-free nearby wet forest, seasonally dry forest, subtropical grassland, or wetland vegetation. These findings imply that the Cerrado formed in situ via recent and frequent adaptive shifts to resist fire, rather than via dispersal of lineages already adapted to fire. The location of the Cerrado surrounded by a diverse array of species-rich biomes, and the apparently modest adaptive barrier posed by fire, are likely to have contributed to its striking species richness. These findings add to growing evidence that the origins and historical assembly of species-rich biomes have been idiosyncratic, driven in large part by unique features of regional- and continental-scale geohistory and that different historical processes can lead to similar levels of modern species richness.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                New Phytologist
                New Phytol
                Wiley
                0028-646X
                1469-8137
                May 08 2019
                June 2019
                January 14 2019
                June 2019
                : 222
                : 4
                : 1994-2008
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institut de Recherche en Biologie Végétale & Département de Sciences Biologiques Université de Montréal H1X 2B2 Montréal QC Canada
                [2 ]Département de Biologie Université de Moncton E1A 3E9 Moncton NB Canada
                [3 ]Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 20a Inverleith Row Edinburgh EH3 5LR UK
                [4 ]Department of Systematic & Evolutionary Botany University of Zurich Zollikerstrasse 107 8008 Zurich Switzerland
                [5 ]Comparative Plant and Fungal Biology Department Royal Botanic Gardens Kew Richmond Surrey TW9 3AB UK
                Article
                10.1111/nph.15633
                30536385
                3cb64c76-e95e-4d1b-bea9-0ae16eb78c5d
                © 2019

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article