2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical value of MRI in evaluating and diagnosing of humeral lateral condyle fracture in children

      research-article
      , , ,
      Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
      BioMed Central
      HLCFs, MRI, Radiograph, Sensitivity, Clinical value

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Humeral lateral condyle fractures (HLCFs) are common paediatric fractures. Radiographs are hard to accurately evaluate and diagnose the damage of articular epiphyseal cartilage in HLCFs.

          Methods

          60 children who should be suspected to be HLCFs in clinical practice from Dec 2015 to Nov 2017 were continuously included as the first part patients. Subsequently, 35 HLCFs patients with complete follow-up information who had no obvious displacement on radiograph were the second part patients. The sensitivity and specificity of radiograph and MRI in diagnosing of HLCFs and their stability were calculated respectively. Calculated the sensitivity and specificity of each scan sequence of MRI in diagnosing of HLCFs osteochondral fractures. The degree of fracture displacement was measured respectively. Compared the ratio of surgical treatment, secondary fracture displacement and complications between the stable fracture group and the unstable fracture group on MRI in part 2 patients.

          Results

          Sensitivity of diagnosing HLCFs by MRI was significantly higher than radiograph (100.00% vs. 89.09%, P = 0.03). Sensitivity of diagnosing integrity of trochlear cartilage chain by MRI was 96.30%, which was significantly higher than that by radiograph (62.96%, P < 0.01). The sensitivity of cartilage sensitive sequence (3D-FS-FSPGR/3D-FSPGR) was different with FS-PDWI and FS-T2WI ( P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). The degree of HLCFs displacement by MRI was higher than radiograph ( P < 0.05). In the unstable fracture group, 5 cases (45.45%) had a fracture displacement of more than 2 mm on MRI, which was significantly higher than that in stable fracture group (0.00%, P < 0.01).

          Conclusions

          MRI is superior to the radiograph of elbow joint in evaluating and diagnosing children HLCFs and their stability. The coronal 3D-FS-FSPGR/3D-FSPGR sequence is a significant sequence for diagnosing osteochondral fractures in HLCFs. MRI can provide important clinical value for treatment decisions of HLCFs without significant displacement.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Paediatric lateral condyle fractures: a systematic review.

          Lateral condyle fractures of the humerus are common paediatric fractures. However, no conclusive statement has been made about their risk of complications, the management and epidemiology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Current Concepts in the Treatment of Lateral Condyle Fractures in Children

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Comparison of quantitative imaging of cartilage for osteoarthritis: T2, T1rho, dGEMRIC and contrast-enhanced computed tomography.

              Evaluation of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) concentration in articular cartilage is of particular interest to the study of degenerative joint diseases such as osteoarthritis (OA). Noninvasive imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) have demonstrated the potential to assess biochemical markers of cartilage integrity such as GAG content; however, many imaging techniques are available and the optimization of particular techniques in the diagnosis of joint disease remains an active area of research. In order to highlight the differences between these various approaches, this work compares MRI (T1, T2 and T1rho) and contrast-enhanced CT in human articular cartilage, in both the presence and absence of gadolinium-based contrast agent. Pre- and postcontrast T2 values were found to be similar on a regional level and correlated with each other. As expected, T1 values were shortened significantly on both a global and a spatial basis in the presence of gadolinium (Gd); similar results were found for T1rho. T2 values were found to correlate mildly with postcontrast T1, T1(Gd) and with precontrast T1rho values. In addition, contrast-enhanced CT values correlated with both precontrast T1rho and T1(Gd) more strongly than with precontrast T2. Finally, T1(Gd) and precontrast T1rho were found to be moderately correlated with CT data. However, T1(Gd) and precontrast T1rho were found to be almost completely uncorrelated. Together, these results indicate that T1rho, T2 and contrast-enhanced techniques may provide complementary information about the molecular environment in cartilage during the evolution of OA.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                tjyy_wangzhi@163.com
                Journal
                J Orthop Surg Res
                J Orthop Surg Res
                Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1749-799X
                18 October 2021
                18 October 2021
                2021
                : 16
                : 617
                Affiliations
                GRID grid.417028.8, ISNI 0000 0004 1799 2608, Department of Radiology, , Tianjin Hospital, ; No. 406, Jiefang Nan Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211 China
                Article
                2726
                10.1186/s13018-021-02726-6
                8522220
                34663390
                3c2640a1-2c5d-4061-9c67-e24bbbca23a4
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 13 July 2021
                : 15 September 2021
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Surgery
                hlcfs,mri,radiograph,sensitivity,clinical value
                Surgery
                hlcfs, mri, radiograph, sensitivity, clinical value

                Comments

                Comment on this article