0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Comparison of quantitative imaging of cartilage for osteoarthritis: T2, T1ρ, dGEMRIC and contrast-enhanced computed tomography

      , , ,
      Magnetic Resonance Imaging
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Evaluation of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) concentration in articular cartilage is of particular interest to the study of degenerative joint diseases such as osteoarthritis (OA). Noninvasive imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) have demonstrated the potential to assess biochemical markers of cartilage integrity such as GAG content; however, many imaging techniques are available and the optimization of particular techniques in the diagnosis of joint disease remains an active area of research. In order to highlight the differences between these various approaches, this work compares MRI (T1, T2 and T1rho) and contrast-enhanced CT in human articular cartilage, in both the presence and absence of gadolinium-based contrast agent. Pre- and postcontrast T2 values were found to be similar on a regional level and correlated with each other. As expected, T1 values were shortened significantly on both a global and a spatial basis in the presence of gadolinium (Gd); similar results were found for T1rho. T2 values were found to correlate mildly with postcontrast T1, T1(Gd) and with precontrast T1rho values. In addition, contrast-enhanced CT values correlated with both precontrast T1rho and T1(Gd) more strongly than with precontrast T2. Finally, T1(Gd) and precontrast T1rho were found to be moderately correlated with CT data. However, T1(Gd) and precontrast T1rho were found to be almost completely uncorrelated. Together, these results indicate that T1rho, T2 and contrast-enhanced techniques may provide complementary information about the molecular environment in cartilage during the evolution of OA.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Magnetic Resonance Imaging
          Magnetic Resonance Imaging
          Elsevier BV
          0730725X
          July 2009
          July 2009
          : 27
          : 6
          : 779-784
          Article
          10.1016/j.mri.2009.01.016
          2722506
          19269769
          d151f606-8178-491b-9de5-77575e4a26b9
          © 2009

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article