1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      ‘I feel that I should decide on my own….’: who should be involved in the decision-making process for adolescent involvement in HIV research?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Efforts to improve health outcomes among adolescents and young adults living with HIV (ALHs) are hampered by limited adolescent engagement in HIV-related research. We sought to understand the views of adolescents, caregivers and healthcare workers (HCWs) about who should make decisions regarding ALHs’ research participation.

          Methods

          We conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) with ALHs (aged 14–24 years), caregivers of ALHs and HCWs from six HIV care clinics in Western Kenya. We used semi-structured guides to explore ALHs’ involvement in research decisions. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis; perspectives were triangulated between groups.

          Results

          We conducted 24 FGDs and 44 IDIs: 12 FGDs with ALHs, 12 with caregivers, and 44 IDIs with HCWs, involving 216 participants. HCWs often suggested that HIV research decision-making should involve caregivers and ALHs deciding together. In contrast, ALHs and parents generally thought decisions should be made individually, whether by HCWs/research teams (although this is likely ethically problematic), adolescents or caregivers. Caregiver and ALH preferences depended on ALHs’ age, with younger ALHs requiring more support. A few caregivers felt that ALHs should consult with the research team/HCWs due to their greater knowledge of clinical care. ALHs emphasised that they should independently decide because they thought they had the right to do so and the capacity to consent. Poor communication and parental non-disclosure of HIV status influenced ALHs’ views to exclude caregivers from decision-making. Regarding influences on research decision-making, ALHs were more willing to participate based on perceived contribution to science and less interested in participating in studies with potential risks, including loss of confidentiality.

          Discussion

          While research teams and HCWs felt that adolescents and caregivers should jointly make research decisions, ALHs and caregivers generally felt individuals should make decisions. As ALHs sometimes find caregiver support lacking, improving family dynamics might enhance research engagement.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups.

              This paper introduces focus group methodology, gives advice on group composition, running the groups, and analysing the results. Focus groups have advantages for researchers in the field of health and medicine: they do not discriminate against people who cannot read or write and they can encourage participation from people reluctant to be interviewed on their own or who feel they have nothing to say.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Glob Health
                BMJ Glob Health
                bmjgh
                bmjgh
                BMJ Global Health
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2059-7908
                2023
                14 November 2023
                : 8
                : 11
                : e012966
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentDepartment of Global Health , Ringgold_7284University of Washington , Seattle, Washington, USA
                [2 ]departmentDepartment of Health Services , Ringgold_7284University of Washington-Seattle Campus , Seattle, Washington, USA
                [3 ]Ringgold_374436Impact Research and Development Organization , Kisumu, Kenya
                [4 ]Ringgold_7284University of Nairobi/Kenyatta National Hospital , Nairobi, Kenya
                [5 ]departmentDepartment of Pediatrics , Ringgold_285569University of Washington , Seattle, Washington, USA
                [6 ]departmentDepartment of Medicine , Ringgold_7284University of Washington , Seattle, Washington, USA
                [7 ]departmentDepartment of Epidemiology , Ringgold_7284University of Washington , Seattle, Washington, USA
                [8 ]departmentDepartment of Child, Family, and Population Health Nursing , Ringgold_285569University of Washington , Seattle, Washington, USA
                [9 ]departmentBioethics Program , Lurie Children's Hospital Chicago , Chicago, Illinois, USA
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Ferdinand C Mukumbang; ferdie@ 123456uw.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1441-2172
                Article
                bmjgh-2023-012966
                10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012966
                10649498
                37963612
                3bb2fb4f-6553-40ae-8443-787398777a99
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 26 May 2023
                : 16 October 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: CFIR;
                Award ID: P30 AI027757
                Funded by: National Institute of Child Health & Human Development;
                Award ID: UG3 HD096906
                Categories
                Original Research
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                hiv,qualitative study,health services research
                hiv, qualitative study, health services research

                Comments

                Comment on this article