14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association of Medicaid vs Marketplace Eligibility on Maternal Coverage and Access With Prenatal and Postpartum Care

      research-article
      , PhD 1 , , , PhD 2 , , PhD 1
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          How does preconception and postpartum coverage and care use compare among women with low incomes gaining eligibility for Medicaid vs marketplace coverage?

          Findings

          In this cohort study of 11 432 women with low incomes, Medicaid eligibility relative to marketplace eligibility was associated with significantly increased Medicaid coverage (20.3 percentage points), decreased private insurance coverage (−10.8 percentage points), and decreased uninsurance (−8.7 percentage points) in the preconception period. It was also associated with increased postpartum Medicaid (17.4 percentage points) and increased adequate prenatal care (4.4 percentage points) but not with significant changes in early prenatal care, postpartum checkups, or postpartum contraception.

          Meaning

          The finding of lower rates of preconception uninsurance among Medicaid-eligible women in this study suggests that women with low incomes were facing barriers to marketplace enrollment.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Policy makers are considering insurance expansions to improve maternal health. The tradeoffs between expanding Medicaid or subsidized private insurance for maternal coverage and care are unknown.

          Objective

          To compare maternal coverage and care by Medicaid vs marketplace eligibility.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          A retrospective cohort study using a difference-in-difference research design was conducted from March 14, 2020, to April 22, 2021. Maternal coverage and care use were compared among women with family incomes 100% to 138% of the federal poverty level (FPL) residing in 10 Medicaid expansion sites (exposure group) who gained Medicaid eligibility under the Affordable Care Act and in 5 nonexpansion sites (comparison group) who gained marketplace eligibility before (2011-2013) and after (2015-2018) insurance expansion implementation. Participants included women aged 18 years or older from the 2011-2018 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System survey.

          Exposures

          Eligibility for Medicaid or marketplace coverage under the Affordable Care Act.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Outcomes included coverage in the preconception and postpartum periods, early and adequate prenatal care, and postpartum checkups and effective contraceptive use.

          Results

          The study population included 11 432 women age 18 years and older (32% age 18-24 years, 33% age 25-29 years, 35% age ≥30 years) with incomes 100% to 138% FPL: 7586 in a Medicaid state (exposure group) and 3846 in a nonexpansion marketplace state (comparison group). Women in marketplace states were younger, had higher educational level and marriage rates, and had less racial and ethnic diversity. Medicaid relative to marketplace eligibility was associated with increased Medicaid coverage (20.3 percentage points; 95% CI, 12.8 to 30.0 percentage points), decreased private insurance coverage (−10.8 percentage points; 95% CI, −13.3 to −7.5 percentage points), and decreased uninsurance (−8.7 percentage points; 95% CI, −20.1 to −0.1 percentage points) in the preconception period, increased postpartum Medicaid (17.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.7 to 34.3 percentage points) and increased adequate prenatal care (4.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.1 to 11.0 percentage points) in difference-in-difference models. No evidence of significant differences in early prenatal care, postpartum check-ups, or postpartum contraception was identified.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this cohort study, eligibility for Medicaid was associated with increased Medicaid, lower preconception uninsurance, and increased adequate prenatal care use. The lower rates of preconception uninsurance among Medicaid-eligible women suggest that women with low incomes were facing barriers to marketplace enrollment, underscoring the potential importance of reducing financial barriers for the population with low incomes.

          Abstract

          This cohort study examines changes in Medicaid vs marketplace prenatal and postpartum coverage of women with low incomes in states with vs without Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Women In The United States Experience High Rates Of Coverage ‘Churn’ In Months Before And After Childbirth

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Validation of self-reported maternal and infant health indicators in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

            To assess the validity of self-reported maternal and infant health indicators reported by mothers an average of 4 months after delivery. Three validity measures-sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV)-were calculated for pregnancy history, pregnancy complications, health care utilization, and infant health indicators self-reported on the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) questionnaire by a representative sample of mothers delivering live births in New York City (NYC) (n = 603) and Vermont (n = 664) in 2009. Data abstracted from hospital records served as gold standards. All data were weighted to be representative of women delivering live births in NYC or Vermont during the study period. Most PRAMS indicators had >90 % specificity. Indicators with >90 % sensitivity and PPV for both sites included prior live birth, any diabetes, and Medicaid insurance at delivery, and for Vermont only, infant admission to the NICU and breastfeeding in the hospital. Indicators with poor sensitivity and PPV (<70 %) for both sites (i.e., NYC and Vermont) included placenta previa and/or placental abruption, urinary tract infection or kidney infection, and for NYC only, preterm labor, prior low-birth-weight birth, and prior preterm birth. For Vermont only, receipt of an HIV test during pregnancy had poor sensitivity and PPV. Mothers accurately reported information on prior live births and Medicaid insurance at delivery; however, mothers' recall of certain pregnancy complications and pregnancy history was poor. These findings could be used to prioritize data collection of indicators with high validity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Adoption of Medicaid Expansion Is Associated with Lower Maternal Mortality

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                6 December 2021
                December 2021
                6 December 2021
                : 4
                : 12
                : e2137383
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Columbia University School of Social Work, New York, New York
                [2 ]Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: October 9, 2021.
                Published: December 6, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.37383
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Eliason EL et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Erica L. Eliason, PhD, Columbia University School of Social Work, 1255 Amsterdam Ave, New York, NY 10027 ( ele2115@ 123456columbia.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Eliason had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: All authors.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Eliason, Daw.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Eliason.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: Eliason, Daw.
                Obtained funding: Eliason.
                Supervision: Daw, Allen.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Allen reported receiving grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and Columbia World Projects outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This research was supported by the Center on Poverty and Social Policy at Columbia University, the Social Work Healthcare Education and Leadership Scholars Fellowship, and the Horowitz Foundation for Social Policy.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Disclaimer: The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the funders, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System Working Group, or Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
                Additional Contributions: We thank the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System Working Group and study participants as well as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for data access.
                Article
                zoi211059
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.37383
                8649838
                34870677
                3b0babd3-91aa-4110-9c77-8c81c13f0536
                Copyright 2021 Eliason EL et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 24 June 2021
                : 9 October 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Health Policy

                Comments

                Comment on this article