7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Arthroscopic Reduction and Suture Bridge Fixation of a Large Displaced Greater Tuberosity Fracture of the Humerus

      brief-report
      , M.D., , M.D. , , M.D.
      Arthroscopy Techniques
      Elsevier

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Arthroscopic fixation of a greater tuberosity (GT) avulsion fracture by suture bridge repair has been described in several articles. However, all of them have used arthroscopic fixation of a small sized GT fracture fragment or have not used purely arthroscopic techniques. In this Technical Note, the authors describe another technique for large displaced GT fracture fixation by arthroscopy only, without any metal fixation. Standard anterior, posterior, lateral, and posterolateral viewing portals are established with an accessory portal for suture anchor insertion. During intra-articular examination, an anteroinferior capsulolabral tear, upper one-third subscapularis tendon tear, and posterosuperior displaced bony fragment are detected. A subscapularis tendon was repaired by a single-row technique. After repair, medial row anchors are inserted into the bare area of infraspinatus tendon and the posterior edge of supraspinatus tendon. A 1-PDS suture is used to pass strands of fiberwire. As with the remplissage procedure, the fiberwire was passed with an 18-gauge needle. Following the acromioplasty, the medial row tightening was done by reducing the fracture fragment. After that, the lateral row anchor was inserted into the bicipital groove, completing the suture bridge technique. This technique can effectively treat other pathologies, has less radiation hazard, and results in fewer soft tissue injuries.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Isolated tuberosity fractures of the proximal humeral: current concepts.

          Despite the relatively common occurrence of fractures of the proximal humeral amongst the elderly, the subgroup of isolated greater and lesser tuberosity fractures have remained less well understood. While the majority of two-part fractures result from a standing-height fall onto an outstretched hand, isolated tuberosity fractures are also commonly associated with glenohumeral dislocations or direct impact to the shoulder region. Inasmuch as isolated greater tuberosity fractures are considered uncommon, isolated lesser tuberosity fractures are generally considered exceedingly rare. Non-operative treatment including a specific rehabilitation protocol has been advocated for the majority of non-displaced and minimally displaced fractures, with generally good outcomes expected. The treatment for displaced fractures, however, has included both arthroscopically assisted fixation and open or percutaneous reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The choice of fixation and approach depends not only on fracture type and characteristics, but also on a multitude of patient-related factors. With an expected increase in the level of physical activity across all age groups and overall longer lifespans, the incidence of isolated tuberosity fractures of the proximal humeral is expected to rise. Orthopaedic surgeons treating shoulder trauma should be aware of treatment options, as well as expected outcomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The influence of displacement on shoulder function in patients with minimally displaced fractures of the greater tuberosity.

            There is little outcome data on functional results after non-operative treatment of greater tuberosity fractures, and no clear evidence in minimally displaced (1-5 mm) fractures of the greater tuberosity showing that the results of non-operative treatments are good enough. This study assesses the relationship between degree of displacement in non-operatively treated patients and shoulder function. We evaluated the radiographs and function in 135 patients after non-operative treatment of minimally displaced (1-5 mm) fractures of the greater tuberosity at a mean time of 3.7 years (2-20 years) after injury. Shoulder function was assessed using the Vienna Shoulder Score (VSS), the Constant Score (CS) and the UCLA-Score. 97% of the evaluated patients had good or excellent results. Patients with a displacement of more than 3 mm had slightly worse results compared to those with less displacement, but this was not statistically significant. Female patients had significantly better results than male patients, and patients in the eighth and ninth decade had significantly worse results compared to younger patients. We recommend non-operative treatment in all patients with minimally displaced fractures of the greater tuberosity, as most obtain very good results. The best results followed treatment with Gilchrist bandages or Mitella slings for 3 weeks, followed by intensive rehabilitation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Characteristics of an isolated greater tuberosity fracture of the humerus.

              Most classification systems tend to include isolated greater tuberosity fractures in the group of proximal humeral fractures. The purpose of this study was to elucidate demographic differences between isolated greater tuberosity fractures and the other proximal humeral fractures. Altogether, 610 proximal humeral fractures were divided into isolated greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus (group I) and all other proximal humeral fractures (group II). The two groups were analyzed according to their incidence, age and sex distribution, presence of dislocation, and associated chronic medical problems. Group I comprised 18.9% and group II 81.1% off all fractures. The mean age of group I was 42.8 years, and that of group II was 54.2 years. Of the 115 (67.8%) patients in group I, 78 (67.8%) were male. In contrast, most of the group II patients were female (332/495, 67.1%). A higher incidence of glenohumeral dislocation occurred in group I (6.9%) than in group II (3.4%). Of the 495 group II patients, 175 (35.4%) had medical problems, including endocrine, cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, and renal disease, whereas only 15 of the 115 (13%) patients in group I had such problems. Patients with isolated greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus were different demographically, and their treatment and classification should be considered separately from that for other proximal humeral fractures.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Arthrosc Tech
                Arthrosc Tech
                Arthroscopy Techniques
                Elsevier
                2212-6287
                12 September 2019
                September 2019
                12 September 2019
                : 8
                : 9
                : e975-e985
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Korea
                Author notes
                []Address correspondence to Young-Min Noh, M.D., Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dong-A University Hospital, 26, Daesingonwon-ro, Seo-gu, Busan 49201, Korea. thugdoc@ 123456naver.com
                Article
                S2212-6287(19)30092-1
                10.1016/j.eats.2019.05.007
                6819744
                31687329
                3a8c1b8f-c6fc-479f-b898-1a51e3667af8
                © 2019 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 5 March 2019
                : 6 May 2019
                Categories
                Technical Note

                Comments

                Comment on this article