13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): Four design features in the ASCENT trial potentially favored the experimental arm

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • Substandard control arm is an important issue when appraising results from a trial.

          • A “physician's choice” should not be restricted: it may penalize the control arm.

          • Dose reduction differences between a trial and the real life question the surrogacy of the reported results for real life patients.

          Abstract

          The ASCENT trial reports impressive results with a median overall survival (OS) increased from 6.7 months to 12.1 months with sacituzumab govitecan over single-agent chemotherapy, in metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients in second and subsequent line of therapy.

          We described design features in the ASCENT trial casting doubt on the extrapolation of the reported results to real world patients. First, the open-label design may exaggerate the effect of the experimental arm. Second, the choice of progression-free-survival (PFS) as a primary endpoint, debatable in metastatic TNBC, can lead to biases: early stopping rules may exaggerate efficacy results and informative censoring can bias PFS results interpretation. Third, the control arm was not a complete “physician's choice”: it was restricted, preventing from using effective agents in this setting, and leading to a substandard control arm. Fourth and lastly, dose reduction and supportive care recommendations for the experimental drug were different between the trial protocol and the FDA labels, and favored the experimental arm as compared with the control arm.

          In conclusion, we described four design features in the ASCENT trial having the potential to favor the experimental arm or to penalize the control arm. It thus remains uncertain in which extent the reported outcomes will translate in the real world. Efforts should be made to avoid trial biases that will eventually prevent to conclude about their true impact in patients when applied broadly.

          Graphical abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          5th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5) †

          Highlights • This ESO-ESMO ABC 5 Clinical Practice Guideline provides key recommendations for managing advanced breast cancer patients • It provides updates on the management of patients with all breast cancer subtypes, LABC, follow-up, palliative and supportive care • Updated diagnostic and treatment algorithms are also provided • All recommendations were compiled by a multidisciplinary group of international experts • Recommendations are based on available clinical evidence and the collective expert opinion of the authors
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sacituzumab Govitecan in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

            Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer have a poor prognosis. Sacituzumab govitecan is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an antibody targeting the human trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2), which is expressed in the majority of breast cancers, coupled to SN-38 (topoisomerase I inhibitor) through a proprietary hydrolyzable linker.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Carboplatin in BRCA1/2-mutated and triple-negative breast cancer BRCAness subgroups: the TNT Trial

              BRCA1/2 germline mutations predispose to breast cancer (gBRCA-BC) by impairing homologous recombination (HR) causing genomic instability. HR also repairs DNA lesions caused by platinums and PARP inhibitors. Triple Negative Breast Cancers (TNBC) harbour sub-populations with BRCA1/2 mutations, hypothesised to be especially platinum sensitive. Putative “BRCAness” subgroups may also be especially platinum sensitive. We assessed carboplatin and mechanistically distinct docetaxel in a phase-III trial in unselected advanced TNBC. A pre-specified programme enabled biomarker-treatment interaction analyses in gBRCA-BC and “BRCAness” subgroups: tumour BRCA1 methylation; BRCA1 mRNA-low; HR deficiency mutational signatures and basal phenotypes. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). In the unselected population (376 patients; 188 carboplatin, 188 docetaxel) carboplatin was not more active than docetaxel (ORR: 31.4v34.0; p=0.66). In contrast in patients with gBRCA-BC carboplatin had double the ORR compared to docetaxel (68%v33%), test for biomarker-treatment interaction (p=0.01). No treatment interaction was observed for BRCA1 methylation, BRCA1 mRNA-low status or a Myriad-HRD mutation signature assay. Significant treatment interaction with basal-like subtype was driven by high docetaxel response in the non-basal subgroup. Patients with advanced TNBC benefit from BRCA1/2 mutation characterization, but not BRCA1 methylation or Myriad-HRD analysis, informing platinum choices. Basal-like gene expression analysis may also influence treatment choices.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Transl Oncol
                Transl Oncol
                Translational Oncology
                Neoplasia Press
                1936-5233
                20 October 2021
                January 2022
                20 October 2021
                : 15
                : 1
                : 101248
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, 4 Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil Street, Geneva 1205 Switzerland
                [b ]Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, 2nd Fl, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. timothee.olivier@ 123456hcuge.ch
                Article
                S1936-5233(21)00240-0 101248
                10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101248
                8531666
                34688044
                3a16ea81-9b34-4999-b58e-ecc9c60079ac
                © 2021 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 27 August 2021
                : 12 October 2021
                Categories
                Perspective

                triple negative breast cancer,substandard control arm,drug dosing,supportive care

                Comments

                Comment on this article