1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Using network models in person-centered care in psychiatry: How perspectivism could help to draw boundaries

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this paper, we explore the conceptual problems that arise when using network analysis in person-centered care (PCC) in psychiatry. Personalized network models are potentially helpful tools for PCC, but we argue that using them in psychiatric practice raises boundary problems, i.e., problems in demarcating what should and should not be included in the model, which may limit their ability to provide clinically-relevant knowledge. Models can have explanatory and representational boundaries, among others. We argue that perspectival reasoning can make more explicit what questions personalized network models can address in PCC, given their boundaries.

          Related collections

          Most cited references94

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks.

          Networks of coupled dynamical systems have been used to model biological oscillators, Josephson junction arrays, excitable media, neural networks, spatial games, genetic control networks and many other self-organizing systems. Ordinarily, the connection topology is assumed to be either completely regular or completely random. But many biological, technological and social networks lie somewhere between these two extremes. Here we explore simple models of networks that can be tuned through this middle ground: regular networks 'rewired' to introduce increasing amounts of disorder. We find that these systems can be highly clustered, like regular lattices, yet have small characteristic path lengths, like random graphs. We call them 'small-world' networks, by analogy with the small-world phenomenon (popularly known as six degrees of separation. The neural network of the worm Caenorhabditis elegans, the power grid of the western United States, and the collaboration graph of film actors are shown to be small-world networks. Models of dynamical systems with small-world coupling display enhanced signal-propagation speed, computational power, and synchronizability. In particular, infectious diseases spread more easily in small-world networks than in regular lattices.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems.

              Recent developments in the quantitative analysis of complex networks, based largely on graph theory, have been rapidly translated to studies of brain network organization. The brain's structural and functional systems have features of complex networks--such as small-world topology, highly connected hubs and modularity--both at the whole-brain scale of human neuroimaging and at a cellular scale in non-human animals. In this article, we review studies investigating complex brain networks in diverse experimental modalities (including structural and functional MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography in humans) and provide an accessible introduction to the basic principles of graph theory. We also highlight some of the technical challenges and key questions to be addressed by future developments in this rapidly moving field.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychiatry
                Front Psychiatry
                Front. Psychiatry
                Frontiers in Psychiatry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-0640
                16 September 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 925187
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Philosophy, Radboud University , Nijmegen, Netherlands
                [2] 2Institute for Science in Society, Radboud University , Nijmegen, Netherlands
                [3] 3Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [4] 4Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                Author notes

                Edited by: Asle Hoffart, Modum Bad Psychiatric Center, Norway

                Reviewed by: Laurence J. Kirmayer, McGill University, Canada; Vasudeo Paralikar, KEM Hospital Research Centre, India

                *Correspondence: Nina S. de Boer nina.deboer@ 123456ru.nl

                This article was submitted to Psychopathology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyt.2022.925187
                9523016
                36186866
                39b04e2b-645d-4ce5-9eec-a29737447bc8
                Copyright © 2022 de Boer, Kostić, Ross, de Bruin and Glas.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 29 April 2022
                : 18 July 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 96, Pages: 12, Words: 9486
                Categories
                Psychiatry
                Conceptual Analysis

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                boundary problem,network analysis,person-centered care,personalized models,perspectivism,psychiatry,topological explanation

                Comments

                Comment on this article