1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Expert consensus on the clinical application of totally implantable venous access devices in the upper arm (2022 Edition)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          With the widespread adoption of ultrasound guidance, Seldinger puncture techniques, and intracardiac electrical positioning technology for the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in recent years, an increasing number of medical staff and patients now accept peripheral placement of totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs) in the upper arm. This approach has the advantage of completely avoiding the risks of hemothorax, pneumothorax, and neck and chest scarring. Medical specialties presently engaged in this study in China include internal medicine, surgery, anesthesiology, and interventional departments. However, command over implantation techniques, treatment of complications, and proper use and maintenance of TIVAD remain uneven among different medical units. Moreover, currently, there are no established quality control standards for implantation techniques or specifications for handling complications. Thus, this expert consensus is proposed to improve the success rate of TIVAD implantation via the upper-arm approach, reduce complication rates, and ensure patient safety. This consensus elaborates on the technical indications and contraindications, procedures and technical points, treatment of complications, and the use and maintenance of upper-arm TIVAD, thus providing a practical reference for medical staff.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Central venous catheter care for the patient with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline.

          To develop an evidence-based guideline on central venous catheter (CVC) care for patients with cancer that addresses catheter type, insertion site, and placement as well as prophylaxis and management of both catheter-related infection and thrombosis. A systematic search of MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library (1980 to July 2012) identified relevant articles published in English. The overall quality of the randomized controlled trial evidence was rated as good. There is consistency among meta-analyses and guidelines compiled by other groups as well. There is insufficient evidence to recommend one CVC type or insertion site; femoral catheterization should be avoided. CVC should be placed by well-trained providers, and the use of a CVC clinical care bundle is recommended. The use of antimicrobial/antiseptic-impregnated and/or heparin-impregnated CVCs is recommended to decrease the risk of catheter-related infections for short-term CVCs, particularly in high-risk groups; more research is needed. The prophylactic use of systemic antibiotics is not recommended before insertion. Data are not sufficient to recommend for or against routine use of antibiotic flush/lock therapy; more research is needed. Before starting antibiotic therapy, cultures should be obtained. Some life-threatening infections require immediate catheter removal, but most can be treated with antimicrobial therapy while the CVC remains in place. Routine flushing with saline is recommended. Prophylactic use of warfarin or low-molecular weight heparin is not recommended, although a tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) is recommended to restore patency to occluded catheters. CVC removal is recommended when the catheter is no longer needed or if there is a radiologically confirmed thrombosis that worsens despite anticoagulation therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Catheter-associated bloodstream infection incidence and risk factors in adults with cancer: a prospective cohort study.

            Central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CABSIs) cause considerable morbidity in patients with cancer. We determined the incidence and risk factors for CABSI by performing a prospective observational cohort study of all adult patients requiring a central venous access device (CVAD) in a haematology-oncology unit. All CVADs were inserted under ultrasound guidance by trained operators in a dedicated interventional radiology facility. A total of 1127 CVADs were assessed in 727 patients over 51,514 line-days. The rate of CABSI per 1000 line-days was 2.50. Factors associated with CABSI included: type of CVAD, greatest for non-tunnelled lines [hazard ratio (HR): 3.50; P < 0.0001] and tunnelled lines (HR: 1.77; P = 0.011) compared to peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) lines; patient diagnosis, greatest for aggressive haematological malignancies (HR: 3.17; P = 0.0007) and least for oesophageal, colon and rectal cancers (HR: 0.29; P = 0.019) compared to other solid tumours; side of insertion, greatest for right-sided lines (HR: 1.60; P = 0.027); and number of prior line insertions (HR: 1.20; P = 0.022). In patients with aggressive haematological malignancies there was significantly more CABSI with non-tunnelled lines (HR: 3.9; P < 0.001) and a trend to more CABSI with tunnelled lines (HR: 1.43; P = 0.12) compared to patients with PICC lines, as well as increased CABSI for right-sided insertions (HR: 1.62; P = 0.047). This study highlights the utility of a standardised CABSI surveillance strategy in adult patients with cancer, provides further data to support the use of PICC lines in such patient populations, and suggests that the side of line insertion may influence risk of CABSI.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              PICC Zone Insertion MethodTM (ZIMTM): A Systematic Approach to Determine the Ideal Insertion Site for PICCs in the Upper Arm

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Interv Med
                J Interv Med
                Journal of Interventional Medicine
                Shanghai Journal of Interventional Radiology Press
                2096-3602
                2590-0293
                29 April 2023
                May 2023
                29 April 2023
                : 6
                : 2
                : 53-58
                Affiliations
                [a ]Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
                [b ]Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Fudan University, China
                [c ]The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, China
                [d ]Liao Ning Cancer Hospital & Institute, China
                [e ]The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, China
                [f ]Beijing Cancer Hospital, China
                [g ]The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, China
                [h ]Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, China
                [i ]The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, China
                [j ]The First Hospital of China Medical University, China
                [k ]The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China
                [l ]The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, China
                [m ]The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, China
                [n ]Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, China
                [o ]The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, China
                [p ]Affiliated Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China
                [q ]Henan Cancer Hospital, China
                [r ]The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China
                [s ]Shenzhen People's Hospital, China
                [t ]The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, China
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. zhangxuebin@ 123456renji.com
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author. chouxiaoxia@ 123456renji.com
                [∗∗∗ ]Corresponding author. lichaoxu163@ 123456163.com
                Article
                S2096-3602(23)00019-4
                10.1016/j.jimed.2023.04.005
                10318320
                384b0c5f-553c-4ff8-89bb-fe5e645d1a33
                © 2023 Shanghai Journal of Interventional Radiology Press. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 26 March 2023
                : 18 April 2023
                : 19 April 2023
                Categories
                Article

                totally implantable venous access device,upper arm,central venous catheter,complication,maintenance

                Comments

                Comment on this article