60
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Predictors of patient satisfaction with hospital health care

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          We used a validated inpatient satisfaction questionnaire to evaluate the health care received by patients admitted to several hospitals. This questionnaire was factored into distinct domains, creating a score for each to assist in the analysis.

          We evaluated possible predictors of patient satisfaction in relation to socio-demographic variables, history of admission, and survey logistics.

          Methods

          Cross-sectional study of patients discharged from four acute care general hospitals. Random sample of 650 discharged patients from the medical and surgical wards of each hospital during February and March 2002. A total of 1,910 patients responded to the questionnaire (73.5%). Patient satisfaction was measured by a validated questionnaire with six domains: information, human care, comfort, visiting, intimacy, and cleanliness. Each domain was scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher levels of patient satisfaction.

          Results

          In the univariate analysis, age was related to all domains except visiting; gender to comfort, visiting, and intimacy; level of education to comfort and cleanliness; marital status to information, human care, intimacy, and cleanliness; length of hospital stay to visiting and cleanliness, and previous admissions to human care, comfort, and cleanliness. The timing of the response to the mailing and who completed the questionnaire were related to all variables except visiting and cleanliness. Multivariate analysis confirmed in most cases the previous findings and added additional correlations for level of education (visiting and intimacy) and marital status (comfort and visiting).

          Conclusion

          These results confirm the varying importance of some socio-demographic variables and length of stay, previous admission, the timing of response to the questionnaire, and who completed the questionnaire on some aspects of patient satisfaction after hospitalization. All these variables should be considered when evaluating patient satisfaction.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts.

          This review presents issues arising from an analysis of over 100 papers published in the field of patient satisfaction. The published output appearing in the medical and nursing literature which incorporated the term "patient satisfaction" rose to a peak of over 1000 papers annually in 1994, reflecting changes in service management especially in the U.K. and U.S.A. over the past decade. An introductory section discusses the setting and measurement of patient satisfaction within this wider context of changes in service delivery. Various models are examined that have attempted to define and interpret the idea of determining individual perceptions of the quality of health care delivered. Determinants of satisfaction are examined in relation to the literature on expectations, and demographic and psychosocial variables. These are distinguished from the multidimensional components of satisfaction as aspects of the delivery of care, identified by many authors. The review highlights the complexity and breadth of the literature in this field, the existence of which is often not acknowledged by researchers presenting the findings of studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies.

              To examine the quality of response rate reporting and to identify methodological factors influencing response rates in published patient satisfaction studies. Examination and analysis of 210 studies from 200 papers published in 1994 in 141 different health journals. Papers were located in the following databases: British Nursing Index, CINAHL, EMBASE, MedLine, Popline, and PsycLIT. Reported and calculated response rates, collection and recruitment procedures of published studies, and type of instruments used for data collection. Forty-eight per cent of studies reported a response rate. The mean response rate was 72.1%. There was no association between response rate and the type of instrument used for data collection. Studies which used a face-to-face approach to either subject recruitment (mean response rate, 76.7%) or data collection (mean response rate, 76.9%) were associated with significantly higher response rates than those in which subjects were recruited by mail (mean response rate, 66.5%) or data were collected by mail (mean response rate, 67%). Response rate was not related to questionnaire length. Patient satisfaction studies generally show poor awareness of the importance of methodological issues relevant to response rate. Far more attention to this aspect is needed if findings in this field are to be accepted as valid and useful.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                2006
                16 August 2006
                : 6
                : 102
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Unidad de Investigación, Hospital de Galdakao, Galdakao, España
                [2 ]Fundación Vasca de Innovación e Investigación Sanitarias (BIOEF), Sondika, España
                [3 ]Unidad de Investigación, Hospital de Txagorritxu, Vitoria-Gasteiz, España
                [4 ]Unidad de Investigación, Hospital de Basurto-Bilbao, Bilbao, España
                [5 ]Servicio de Neumología, Hospital de Galdakao, Galdakao, España
                [6 ]Unidad de Calidad, Hospital de Cruces, Cruces, España
                [7 ]Servicio de Psiquiatría y Psicología, Hospital de Basurto-Bilbao, Bilbao, España
                [8 ]School of Social and Political Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Great Britain
                Article
                1472-6963-6-102
                10.1186/1472-6963-6-102
                1579213
                16914046
                382d2a5e-7e08-4649-9988-a0434ea775e7
                Copyright © 2006 Quintana et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 26 June 2006
                : 16 August 2006
                Categories
                Research Article

                Health & Social care
                Health & Social care

                Comments

                Comment on this article