4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The effect of proliferative hypertrophic scars on determining treatment options for preventing recurrence of vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis after radical prostatectomy: a single-center cross-sectional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          BACKGROUND:

          Vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS) following retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) significantly worsens quality of life.

          OBJECTIVES:

          To investigate the relationship between proliferative hypertrophic scar formation and VUAS, and predict more appropriate surgical intervention for preventing recurrent VUAS.

          DESIGN AND SETTING:

          Retrospective cross-sectional single-center study on data covering January 2009 to December 2019.

          METHODS:

          Among 573 male patients who underwent RRP due to prostate cancer, 80 with VUAS were included. They were divided into two groups according to VUAS treatment method: dilatation using Amplatz renal dilators (39 patients); or endoscopic bladder neck incision/resection (41 patients). The Vancouver scar scale (VSS) was used to evaluate the characteristics of scars that occurred for any reason before development of VUAS.

          RESULTS:

          Over a median follow-up of 72 months (range 12-105) after RRP, 17 patients (21.3%) had recurrence of VUAS. Although the treatment success rates were similar (79.5% versus 78.0%; P = 0.875), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that dilatation using Amplatz dilators rather than endoscopic bladder neck incision/resection in patients with VSS scores 4, 5 and 6 may significantly reduce VUAS recurrence. A strong positive relationship was observed between VSS and total number of VUAS occurrences (r: 0.689; P < 0.001). VSS score (odds ratio, OR: 5.380; P < 0.001) and time until occurrence of VUAS (OR: 1.628; P = 0.008) were the most significant predictors for VUAS recurrence.

          CONCLUSIONS:

          VSS score can be used as a prediction tool for choosing more appropriate surgical intervention, for preventing recurrent VUAS.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy.

          Recent studies of surgery for cancer have demonstrated variations in outcomes among hospitals and among surgeons. We sought to examine variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data base to evaluate health-related outcomes after radical prostatectomy. The rates of postoperative complications, late urinary complications (strictures or fistulas 31 to 365 days after the procedure), and long-term incontinence (more than 1 year after the procedure) were inferred from the Medicare claims records of 11,522 patients who underwent prostatectomy between 1992 and 1996. These rates were analyzed in relation to hospital volume and surgeon volume (the number of procedures performed at individual hospitals and by individual surgeons, respectively). Neither hospital volume nor surgeon volume was significantly associated with surgery-related death. Significant trends in the relation between volume and outcome were observed with respect to postoperative complications and late urinary complications. Postoperative morbidity was lower in very-high-volume hospitals than in low-volume hospitals (27 percent vs. 32 percent, P=0.03) and was also lower when the prostatectomy was performed by very-high-volume surgeons than when it was performed by low-volume surgeons (26 percent vs. 32 percent, P<0.001). The rates of late urinary complications followed a similar pattern. Results for long-term preservation of continence were less clear-cut. In a detailed analysis of the 159 surgeons who had a high or very high volume of procedures, wide surgeon-to-surgeon variations in these clinical outcomes were observed, and they were much greater than would be predicted on the basis of chance or observed variations in the case mix. In men undergoing prostatectomy, the rates of postoperative and late urinary complications are significantly reduced if the procedure is performed in a high-volume hospital and by a surgeon who performs a high number of such procedures.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Urethral strictures.

            What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Urethral strictures are common and increasingly common in an ageing population. The treatment is controversial and particularly the relative roles of urethrotomy or urethral dilatation on the one hand and urethroplasty on the other. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the subject including less commonly discussed issues such as the history and pathology of stricture disease. We would hope that a comprehensive overview of the subject will give a sharper perspective to aid the investigation and management of patients with urethral strictures. © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL. NO CLAIM TO ORIGINAL US GOVERNMENT WORKS.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Rating the Burn Scar

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: conceptualization (equal), data curation (equal), formal analysis (equal), investigation (equal), methodology (equal), project administration (equal), resources (equal), supervision (supporting), validation (equal), writing-original draft (lead) and writing-review and editing (equal);
                Role: data curation (equal), formal analysis (equal), investigation (equal), resources (equal), supervision (supporting) and validation (equal);
                Role: data curation (equal), formal analysis (equal), investigation (equal), resources (equal), supervision (supporting) and validation (equal);
                Role: conceptualization (equal), data curation (equal), formal analysis (equal), investigation (equal), methodology (equal), project administration (equal), resources (equal), supervision (lead), validation (equal), visualization (equal) and writing-review and editing (equal).
                Journal
                Sao Paulo Med J
                Sao Paulo Med J
                Sao Paulo Med J
                São Paulo Medical Journal
                Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
                1516-3180
                1806-9460
                26 April 2021
                2021
                : 139
                : 3
                : 241-250
                Affiliations
                [I ] originalMD. Physician, Department of Urology, Department of Urology, Karabük University Training and Research Hospital, Karabük, Turkey
                [II ] originalMD. Physician, Department of Urology, Health Science University Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
                [III ] originalMD. Physician, Department of Urology, Health Science University Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
                [IV ] originalMD. Professor, Department of Urology, Health Science University Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Ismail Selvi. Department of Urology, Karabük University Training and Research Hospital, 78200, Karabük, Turkey. Tel. +90 370 415 80 00. Fax. +90 370 412 56 28. E-mail: ismselvi33@ 123456hotmail.com

                Authors’ contributions: All authors actively contributed to discussion of the results of the study, and reviewed and approved the final version to be released

                Conflict of interest: None

                Article
                10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0349.R1.28012021
                9625006
                33909829
                368536e4-cbf3-457e-8b69-7458842b6ff0
                © 2022 by Associação Paulista de Medicina

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons license.

                History
                : 26 June 2020
                : 08 December 2020
                : 28 January 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 29, Pages: 10
                Categories
                Original Article

                urinary bladder neck obstruction,prostatectomy,cicatrix, hypertrophic,proliferative hypertrophic scar,retropubic radical prostatectomy,vancouver scar scale,vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article