0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Chromium nanoparticles improve bone turnover regulation in rats fed a high-fat, low-fibre diet

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of returning to a balanced diet combined with chromium picolinate (CrPic) or chromium nanoparticles (CrNPs) supplementation at a pharmacologically relevant dose of 0.3 mg/kg body weight on the expression level of selected genes and bone turnover markers in the blood and bones of rats fed an obese diet. The results of the study showed that chronic intake of a high-fat obesogenic diet negatively affects bone turnover by impairing processes of both synthesis and degradation of bones. The switch to a healthy diet proved insufficient to regulate bone metabolism disorders induced by an obesogenic diet, even when it was supplemented with chromium, irrespective of its form. Supplementation with CrPic with no change in diet stimulated bone metabolism only at the molecular level, towards increased osteoclastogenesis (bone resorption). In contrast, CrNPs added to the high-fat diet effectively regulated bone turnover by increasing both osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis, with these changes directed more towards bone formation. The results of the study suggest that unfavourable changes in bone metabolism induced by chronic intake of a high-fat diet can be mitigated by supplementation with CrNPs, whereas a change in eating habits fails to achieve a similar effect.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Osteocyte-driven bone remodeling.

          Osteocytes, the most abundant cells in bone, have been long postulated to detect and respond to mechanical and hormonal stimuli and to coordinate the function of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. The discovery that the inhibitor of bone formation sclerostin is primarily expressed in osteocytes in bone and downregulated by anabolic stimuli provided a mechanism by which osteocytes influence the activity of osteoblasts. Advances of the last few years provided experimental evidence demonstrating that osteocytes also participate in the recruitment of osteoclasts and the initiation of bone remodeling. Apoptotic osteocytes trigger yet-to-be-identified signals that attract osteoclast precursors to specific areas of bone, which in turn differentiate to mature, bone-resorbing osteoclasts. Osteocytes are also the source of molecules that regulate the generation and activity of osteoclasts, such as OPG and RANKL; and genetic manipulations of the mouse genome leading to loss or gain of function or to altered expression of either molecule in osteocytes markedly affect bone resorption. This review highlights these investigations and discusses how the novel concept of osteocyte-driven bone resorption and formation impacts our understanding of the mechanisms by which current therapies control bone remodeling.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Leptin acts on human marrow stromal cells to enhance differentiation to osteoblasts and to inhibit differentiation to adipocytes.

            Both bone mass and serum leptin levels are increased in obesity. Because osteoblasts and adipocytes arise from a common precursor in bone marrow, we assessed the effects of human recombinant leptin on a conditionally immortalized human marrow stromal cell line, hMS2-12, with the potential to differentiate to either the osteoblast or adipocyte phenotypes. By RT-PCR and Western immunoblot analysis, the hMS2-12 cells expressed messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein for the leptin receptor. Leptin did not affect hMS2-12 cell proliferation, but resulted in dose- and time-dependent increases in mRNA and protein levels of alkaline phosphatase, type I collagen, and osteocalcin, and in a 59% increase in mineralized matrix. Leptin increased mRNA levels of lipoprotein lipase at 3 days, but decreased mRNA levels of adipsin and leptin at 9 days and decreased lipid droplet formation by 50%. Leptin did not affect the expression of Cbfa1 or peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma2, transcription factors involved in commitment to the osteoblast and adipocyte pathways, respectively. Thus, leptin acts on human marrow stromal cells to enhance osteoblast differentiation and to inhibit adipocyte differentiation. Our data support the hypothesis that leptin is a previously unrecognized, physiological regulator of these two differentiation pathways, acting primarily on maturation of stromal cells into both lineages.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Biochemical markers of bone metabolism: an overview.

              An overview of biochemical markers of bone metabolism is presented along with indications for their clinical utilization. The structure, cyclical metabolism, and hormone regulation of bone is reflected by markers of resorption, formation and/or turnover. Markers of resorption representing degradation of type 1 collagen, include N-telopeptides, C-telopeptides, hydroxyproline, and the collagen crosslinks pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline; acid phosphatase, a marker of osteoclast activity, and urinary calcium are also indicators of bone resorption. Bone formation markers indicate osteoblast activity; bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and the N-terminal and C-terminal extension peptides of procollagen reflect formation of organic matrix in bone. Osteocalcin, produced by osteoblasts but also released during osteoclastic degradation, may indicate either formation when resorption and formation are coupled or turnover when they are uncoupled. Bone markers respond to intervention more rapidly than techniques such bone mineral density. Resorption markers respond approximately 1 to 3 months after intervention; markers of formation respond later, after 6 to 9 months. Bone markers may add useful information for assessing fracture risk and for monitoring osteoporosis, Paget's disease of bone, cancer metastasis, and metabolic disease. Various therapeutic interventions may affect release of some bone markers. Bone disease has high prevalence in adults so bone markers will become even more important for assessing fracture risk and monitoring therapy as populations age. Characteristics of bone markers are dependent on biology and the assay used. Substantial work remains in characterizing existing assays, identifying better markers and performing the clinical studies to define which bone markers should be measured and when.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: InvestigationRole: Validation
                Role: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLOS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                8 May 2024
                2024
                : 19
                : 5
                : e0300292
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, Department of Biochemistry and Toxicology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland
                [2 ] Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Olsztyn, Poland
                [3 ] Chair and Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
                Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Department of Pharmacological Sciences, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0437-4766
                Article
                PONE-D-23-33139
                10.1371/journal.pone.0300292
                11078379
                38718051
                363bb339-2190-44e1-9561-6f940657761e
                © 2024 Cholewińska et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 11 October 2023
                : 24 February 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 6, Pages: 18
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004281, Narodowe Centrum Nauki;
                Award ID: 2020/39/B/NZ9/00674
                Award Recipient :
                This research was carried out as part of a project financed from science funds allocated for activities supporting the development of young scientists by the University of Life Sciences, Project No. ZKT/MN-1/ZiR/21 - EC. In addition, this work was supported by the National Science Centre, Grant No. 2020/39/B/NZ9/00674.- JJ, KO. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Nutrition
                Diet
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Nutrition
                Diet
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Physiological Parameters
                Body Weight
                Obesity
                Physical Sciences
                Chemistry
                Chemical Elements
                Chromium
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Physiological Processes
                Bone Remodeling
                Bone Resorption
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Physiological Processes
                Bone Remodeling
                Engineering and Technology
                Nanotechnology
                Nanoparticles
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Biological Tissue
                Connective Tissue
                Adipose Tissue
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Biological Tissue
                Connective Tissue
                Adipose Tissue
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Physiological Parameters
                Body Weight
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article