Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Interventions for the Elderly: A Scoping Review from 2015–2019

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this study, a scoping review method is used to review the distribution and trends in health promotion research and explore the use and contribution of eHealth technologies in health promotion in the elderly. The study includes six search databases: PubMed, CINAHL, the CochraneLibrary, EMBASE, PubPsych, and ERIC (EBSCOhost), and studies published from January 2015 to October 2019, written in English, were included and analyzed. The findings of the study reveal that the amount of literature on promoting health for the elderly has increased, and some specific types of interventions are still favored in current health promotion efforts for older adults. The most commonly used methods were found to be health promotion ( n = 322), followed by screening ( n = 264), primary prevention ( n = 114), and finally social support ( n = 72). Beyond the above interventions, eHealth technology is also used in health promotion activities to prevent the elderly from falling and to improve home safety, etc. However, although the application of eHealth technology has been applied in areas such as fall prevention, mental health promotion, and home security monitoring, it is still immature, and thus more rigorous research is needed in different areas, especially in older populations, various professions, women, and people with dementia.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Smart homes and home health monitoring technologies for older adults: A systematic review.

            Around the world, populations are aging and there is a growing concern about ways that older adults can maintain their health and well-being while living in their homes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care

              Objective With an elderly population that is set to more than double by 2050 worldwide, there will be an increased demand for elderly care. This poses several impediments in the delivery of high-quality health and social care. Socially assistive robot (SAR) technology could assume new roles in health and social care to meet this higher demand. This review qualitatively examines the literature on the use of SAR in elderly care and aims to establish the roles this technology may play in the future. Design Scoping review. Data sources Search of CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, PsychINFO and Scopus databases was conducted, complemented with a free search using Google Scholar and reference harvesting. All publications went through a selection process, which involved sequentially reviewing the title, abstract and full text of the publication. No limitations regarding date of publication were imposed, and only English publications were taken into account. The main search was conducted in March 2016, and the latest search was conducted in September 2017. Eligibility criteria The inclusion criteria consist of elderly participants, any elderly healthcare facility, humanoid and pet robots and all social interaction types with the robot. Exclusions were acceptability studies, technical reports of robots and publications surrounding physically or surgically assistive robots. Results In total, 61 final publications were included in the review, describing 33 studies and including 1574 participants and 11 robots. 28 of the 33 papers report positive findings. Five roles of SAR were identified: affective therapy, cognitive training, social facilitator, companionship and physiological therapy. Conclusions Although many positive outcomes were reported, a large proportion of the studies have methodological issues, which limit the utility of the results. Nonetheless, the reported value of SAR in elderly care does warrant further investigation. Future studies should endeavour to validate the roles demonstrated in this review. Systematic review registration NIHR 58672.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                24 July 2020
                August 2020
                : 17
                : 15
                : 5335
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Gerontology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan; g60435g@ 123456yahoo.com.tw
                [2 ]School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan; panda20220@ 123456gmail.com
                [3 ]Department of Statistics, College of Management, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan; tiffanyl1999@ 123456gmail.com
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: cjchiu@ 123456mail.ncku.edu.tw ; Tel.: +886-6235-3535 (ext. 5739)
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2352-9105
                Article
                ijerph-17-05335
                10.3390/ijerph17155335
                7432678
                32722162
                328641cb-96d3-4ad4-9115-6a1738555fc5
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 28 May 2020
                : 22 July 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                elderly,scoping review,health promotion,ehealth
                Public health
                elderly, scoping review, health promotion, ehealth

                Comments

                Comment on this article