Stellate Ganglion Block and Intraarterial Spasmolysis in Patients with Cerebral Vasospasm: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract

Background

In patients with symptomatic cerebral vasospasm (CV) following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who do not respond to medical therapy, urgent treatment escalation has been suggested to be beneficial for brain tissue at risk. In our routine clinical care setting, we implemented stellate ganglion block (SGB) as a rescue therapy with subsequent escalation to intraarterial spasmolysis (IAS) with milrinone for refractory CV.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis from 2012 to 2021, patients with CV following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who received an SGB or IAS were identified. Patients were assessed through neurological examination and transcranial Doppler. Rescue therapy was performed in patients with mean cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) ≥ 120 cm/s and persistent neurological deterioration/intubation under induced hypertension. Patients were reassessed after therapy and the following day. The Glasgow Outcome Scale was assessed at discharge and 6-month follow-up.

Results

A total of 82 patients (mean age 50.16 years) with 184 areas treated with SGB and/or IAS met the inclusion criteria; 109 nonaffected areas were extracted as controls. The mean CBFV decrease in the middle cerebral artery on the following day was − 30.1 (± 45.2) cm/s with SGB and − 31.5 (± 45.2) cm/s with IAS. Mixed linear regression proved the significance of the treatment categories; other fixed effects (sex, age, aneurysm treatment modality [clipping or coiling], World Federation of Neurological Surgeons score, and Fisher score) were insignificant. In logistic regression, the presence of cerebral infarction on imaging before discharge from the intensive care unit (34/82) was significantly associated with unfavorable outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale ≤ 3) at follow-up.

Conclusions

Stellate ganglion block and IAS decreased CBFV the following 24 h in patients with CV. We suggest SGB alone for patients with mild symptomatic CV (CBFV < 180 cm/s), while subsequent escalation to IAS proved to be beneficial in patients with refractory CV and severe CBFV elevation (CBFV ≥ 180 cm/s).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12028-023-01762-w.