2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A cell-based ELISA as surrogate of virus neutralization assay for RBD SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies

      research-article
      a , b , b , a , a , a , a , c , d , d , e , e , a , a , a , a , a , a , *
      Vaccine
      Published by Elsevier Ltd.
      SARS-CoV-2, cell-based ELISA, cVNT, mVNT, vaccine, NAbs, neutralizing antibodies, cVNT, conventional virus neutralization test, mVNT, molecular virus neutralization test, PFA, paraformaldehyde, RT, room temperature, RBD-hFc, RBD fused to human IgG Fc fragment, RBD-mFc, RBD fused to mouse IgG Fc fragment, cbE-VNT, cell based ELISA-virus neutralization test, AP, alkaline phosphatase

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Graphical abstract

          Abstract

          SARS-CoV-2, the cause of the COVID-19 pandemic, has provoked a global crisis and death of millions of people. Several serological assays to determine the quality of the immune response against SARS-CoV-2 and the efficacy of vaccines have been developed, among them the gold standard conventional virus neutralization assays. However, these tests are time consuming, require biosafety level 3 (BSL3), and are low throughput and expensive. This has motivated the development of alternative methods, including molecular inhibition assays. Herein, we present a safe cell-based ELISA-virus neutralization test (cbE-VNT) as a surrogate for the conventional viral neutralization assays that detects the inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 RBD binding to ACE2-bearing cells independently of species. Our test shows a very good correlation with the conventional and molecular neutralization assays and achieves 100% specificity and 95% sensitivity. cbE-VNT is cost-effective, fast and enables a large-scale serological evaluation that can be performed in a BSL2 laboratory, allowing its use in pre-clinical and clinical investigations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor

          Summary The recent emergence of the novel, pathogenic SARS-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in China and its rapid national and international spread pose a global health emergency. Cell entry of coronaviruses depends on binding of the viral spike (S) proteins to cellular receptors and on S protein priming by host cell proteases. Unravelling which cellular factors are used by SARS-CoV-2 for entry might provide insights into viral transmission and reveal therapeutic targets. Here, we demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 uses the SARS-CoV receptor ACE2 for entry and the serine protease TMPRSS2 for S protein priming. A TMPRSS2 inhibitor approved for clinical use blocked entry and might constitute a treatment option. Finally, we show that the sera from convalescent SARS patients cross-neutralized SARS-2-S-driven entry. Our results reveal important commonalities between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV infection and identify a potential target for antiviral intervention.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection

            Predictive models of immune protection from COVID-19 are urgently needed to identify correlates of protection to assist in the future deployment of vaccines. To address this, we analyzed the relationship between in vitro neutralization levels and the observed protection from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection using data from seven current vaccines and from convalescent cohorts. We estimated the neutralization level for 50% protection against detectable SARS-CoV-2 infection to be 20.2% of the mean convalescent level (95% confidence interval (CI) = 14.4-28.4%). The estimated neutralization level required for 50% protection from severe infection was significantly lower (3% of the mean convalescent level; 95% CI = 0.7-13%, P = 0.0004). Modeling of the decay of the neutralization titer over the first 250 d after immunization predicts that a significant loss in protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection will occur, although protection from severe disease should be largely retained. Neutralization titers against some SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern are reduced compared with the vaccine strain, and our model predicts the relationship between neutralization and efficacy against viral variants. Here, we show that neutralization level is highly predictive of immune protection, and provide an evidence-based model of SARS-CoV-2 immune protection that will assist in developing vaccine strategies to control the future trajectory of the pandemic.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Development and clinical application of a rapid IgM‐IgG combined antibody test for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection diagnosis

              Abstract The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) quickly spread all over China and to more than 20 other countries. Although the virus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus [SARS‐Cov‐2]) nucleic acid real‐time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test has become the standard method for diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, these real‐time PCR test kits have many limitations. In addition, high false‐negative rates were reported. There is an urgent need for an accurate and rapid test method to quickly identify a large number of infected patients and asymptomatic carriers to prevent virus transmission and assure timely treatment of patients. We have developed a rapid and simple point‐of‐care lateral flow immunoassay that can detect immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies simultaneously against SARS‐CoV‐2 virus in human blood within 15 minutes which can detect patients at different infection stages. With this test kit, we carried out clinical studies to validate its clinical efficacy uses. The clinical detection sensitivity and specificity of this test were measured using blood samples collected from 397 PCR confirmed COVID‐19 patients and 128 negative patients at eight different clinical sites. The overall testing sensitivity was 88.66% and specificity was 90.63%. In addition, we evaluated clinical diagnosis results obtained from different types of venous and fingerstick blood samples. The results indicated great detection consistency among samples from fingerstick blood, serum and plasma of venous blood. The IgM‐IgG combined assay has better utility and sensitivity compared with a single IgM or IgG test. It can be used for the rapid screening of SARS‐CoV‐2 carriers, symptomatic or asymptomatic, in hospitals, clinics, and test laboratories.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Vaccine
                Vaccine
                Vaccine
                Published by Elsevier Ltd.
                0264-410X
                1873-2518
                15 February 2022
                15 February 2022
                Affiliations
                [a ]Immunology and Immunotherapy Division, Center of Molecular Immunology (CIM), P.O. Box 16040, 216 St. Havana, Cuba
                [b ]National Laboratory of Civil Defense (NLCD), Jamaica Highway and National Highway, San José of Lajas, Mayabeque, Cuba
                [c ]Quality Division, Center of Molecular Immunology (CIM), P.O. Box 16040, 216 St. Havana, Cuba
                [d ]Finlay Vaccine Institute (IFV), 200 and 21 Street, Havana 11600, Cuba
                [e ]Institute of Hematology and Immunology (IHI), Havana, Cuba
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding autor at: Immunology and Immunotherapy Division, Center of Molecular Immunology (CIM), 216 and 15 St. Havana, Cuba
                Article
                S0264-410X(22)00190-6
                10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.044
                8856731
                35193792
                31fddb51-b8fb-483a-af79-317be8ed9d45
                © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 18 August 2021
                : 20 December 2021
                : 9 February 2022
                Categories
                Article

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                sars-cov-2,cell-based elisa,cvnt,mvnt,vaccine,nabs, neutralizing antibodies,cvnt, conventional virus neutralization test,mvnt, molecular virus neutralization test,pfa, paraformaldehyde,rt, room temperature,rbd-hfc, rbd fused to human igg fc fragment,rbd-mfc, rbd fused to mouse igg fc fragment,cbe-vnt, cell based elisa-virus neutralization test,ap, alkaline phosphatase

                Comments

                Comment on this article