0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Improved Glycemia and Quality of Life Among Loop Users: Analysis of Real-world Data From a Single Center

      research-article
      , MBChB 1 , , 1 , , MD 1 , 2 , , BMedSci, MBBS, PhD 1 , 2 , 3 , , MD, MSc 1
      (Reviewer), (Reviewer), (Reviewer), (Reviewer)
      JMIR Diabetes
      JMIR Publications
      type 1 diabetes, closed loop, automated insulin delivery, do-it-yourself

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Despite do-it-yourself automated insulin delivery being an unapproved method of insulin delivery, an increasing number of people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) worldwide are choosing to use Loop, a do-it-yourself automated insulin delivery system.

          Objective

          In this study, we aimed to assess glycemic outcomes, safety, and the perceived impact on quality of life (QOL) in a local Edmonton cohort of known Loop users.

          Methods

          An observational study of adults with T1D who used Loop was performed. An assessment of glycemic and safety outcomes, HbA 1c, time in range, hospital admissions, and time below range compared users most recent 6 months of Loop use, with their prior regulatory approved insulin delivery method. QOL outcomes were assessed using Insulin Dosing Systems: Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections, and Expectations, diabetes impact, and device satisfaction measures (with maximum scores of 100, 10, and 10, respectively) and semistructured interviews.

          Results

          The 24 adults with T1D who took part in this study 16 (67%) were female, with a median age of 33 (IQR 28-45) years, median duration of diabetes of 22 (IQR 17-32) years, median pre-Loop HbA 1c of 7.9% (IQR 7.6%-8.3%), and a median duration of Loop use of 18 (IQR 12-25) months. During Loop use, the participants had median (IQR) values of 7.1% (6.5%-7.5%), 54 mmol (48-58) for HbA 1c and 76.5% (64.6%-81.9%) for time in range, which were a significant improvement from prior therapy ( P=.001 and P=.005), with a nonsignificant reduction in time below range; 3.0 to 3.9 mmol/L ( P=.17) and <3 mmol/L ( P=.53). Overall, 2 episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis occurred in a total of 470 months of Loop use, and no severe hypoglycemia occurred. The positive impact of Loop use on QOL was explored in qualitative analysis and additionally demonstrated through a median Insulin Dosing Systems: Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections, and Expectations score of 86 (IQR 79-95), a median diabetes impact score of 2.8 (IQR 2.1-3.9), and a median device satisfaction score of 9 (IQR 8.2-9.4).

          Conclusions

          This local cohort of people with T1D demonstrated a beneficial effect of Loop use on both glycemic control and QOL, with no safety concerns being highlighted.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range

            Improvements in sensor accuracy, greater convenience and ease of use, and expanding reimbursement have led to growing adoption of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). However, successful utilization of CGM technology in routine clinical practice remains relatively low. This may be due in part to the lack of clear and agreed-upon glycemic targets that both diabetes teams and people with diabetes can work toward. Although unified recommendations for use of key CGM metrics have been established in three separate peer-reviewed articles, formal adoption by diabetes professional organizations and guidance in the practical application of these metrics in clinical practice have been lacking. In February 2019, the Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes (ATTD) Congress convened an international panel of physicians, researchers, and individuals with diabetes who are expert in CGM technologies to address this issue. This article summarizes the ATTD consensus recommendations for relevant aspects of CGM data utilization and reporting among the various diabetes populations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              State of Type 1 Diabetes Management and Outcomes from the T1D Exchange in 2016–2018

              To provide a snapshot of the profile of adults and youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the United States and assessment of longitudinal changes in T1D management and clinical outcomes in the T1D Exchange registry.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Diabetes
                JMIR Diabetes
                JD
                JMIR Diabetes
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2371-4379
                Oct-Dec 2022
                24 October 2022
                : 7
                : 4
                : e40326
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism Department of Medicine University of Alberta Edmonton, AB Canada
                [2 ] Diabetes Action Canada Toronto, ON Canada
                [3 ] Alberta Diabetes Institute Edmonton, AB Canada
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Amy E Morrison amymorrison15@ 123456doctors.org.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3353-1863
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8640-8733
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0187-8168
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4272-8131
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1033-8673
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3667-5205
                Article
                v7i4e40326
                10.2196/40326
                9641512
                36279156
                31b5b363-8d7b-4658-9487-5593d22f8b31
                ©Amy E Morrison, Kimberley Chong, Valerie Lai, Kate Farnsworth, Peter A Senior, Anna Lam. Originally published in JMIR Diabetes (https://diabetes.jmir.org), 24.10.2022.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Diabetes, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://diabetes.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 15 June 2022
                : 10 August 2022
                : 17 August 2022
                : 1 September 2022
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                type 1 diabetes,closed loop,automated insulin delivery,do-it-yourself

                Comments

                Comment on this article