12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Brief Report: Safety and Antitumor Activity of Alectinib Plus Atezolizumab From a Phase 1b Study in Advanced ALK-Positive NSCLC

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Alectinib is a preferred first-line treatment option for advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Combination regimens of alectinib with immune checkpoint inhibitors are being evaluated for synergistic effects.

          Methods

          Adults with treatment-naive, stage IIIB/IV, or recurrent ALK-positive NSCLC were enrolled into a two-stage phase 1b study. Patients received alectinib 600 mg (twice daily during cycle 1 and throughout each 21-d cycle thereafter) plus atezolizumab 1200 mg (d8 of cycle 1 and then d1 of each 21-d cycle). Primary objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability of alectinib plus atezolizumab. Secondary objectives included assessments of antitumor activity.

          Results

          In total, 21 patients received more than or equal to 1 dose of alectinib or atezolizumab. As no dose-limiting toxicities were observed in stage 1 (n = 7), the starting dose and schedule were continued into stage 2 (n = 14). Median duration of follow-up was 29 months (range: 1–39). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 57% of the patients, most often rash (19%). No grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse events were reported. Confirmed objective response rate was 86% (18 of 21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 64–97). Median progression-free survival was not estimable (NE) (95% CI: 13 mo–NE), neither was median overall survival (95% CI: 33 mo–NE).

          Conclusions

          The combination of alectinib and atezolizumab is feasible, but increased toxicity was found compared with the individual agents. With small sample sizes and relatively short follow-up, definitive conclusions regarding antitumor activity cannot be made.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial.

          Atezolizumab is a humanised antiprogrammed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody that inhibits PD-L1 and programmed death-1 (PD-1) and PD-L1 and B7-1 interactions, reinvigorating anticancer immunity. We assessed its efficacy and safety versus docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Atezolizumab for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC

            The cancer-cell-killing property of atezolizumab may be enhanced by the blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated immunosuppression with bevacizumab. This open-label, phase 3 study evaluated atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had not previously received chemotherapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

              Background Alectinib, a highly selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), has shown systemic and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy in the treatment of ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated alectinib as compared with crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, including those with asymptomatic CNS disease. Methods In a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 303 patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC to receive either alectinib (600 mg twice daily) or crizotinib (250 mg twice daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary end points were independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival, time to CNS progression, objective response rate, and overall survival. Results During a median follow-up of 17.6 months (crizotinib) and 18.6 months (alectinib), an event of disease progression or death occurred in 62 of 152 patients (41%) in the alectinib group and 102 of 151 patients (68%) in the crizotinib group. The rate of investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly higher with alectinib than with crizotinib (12-month event-free survival rate, 68.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 61.0 to 75.9] with alectinib vs. 48.7% [95% CI, 40.4 to 56.9] with crizotinib; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.65]; P<0.001); the median progression-free survival with alectinib was not reached. The results for independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival were consistent with those for the primary end point. A total of 18 patients (12%) in the alectinib group had an event of CNS progression, as compared with 68 patients (45%) in the crizotinib group (cause-specific hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.28; P<0.001). A response occurred in 126 patients in the alectinib group (response rate, 82.9%; 95% CI, 76.0 to 88.5) and in 114 patients in the crizotinib group (response rate, 75.5%; 95% CI, 67.8 to 82.1) (P=0.09). Grade 3 to 5 adverse events were less frequent with alectinib (41% vs. 50% with crizotinib). Conclusions As compared with crizotinib, alectinib showed superior efficacy and lower toxicity in primary treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; ALEX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02075840 .).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JTO Clin Res Rep
                JTO Clin Res Rep
                JTO Clinical and Research Reports
                Elsevier
                2666-3643
                25 June 2022
                August 2022
                25 June 2022
                : 3
                : 8
                : 100367
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
                [b ]Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
                [c ]Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
                [d ]Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
                [e ]Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
                [f ]AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, Florida
                [g ]Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
                [h ]Division of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
                [i ]Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
                [j ]UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                [k ]Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
                [l ]University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, California
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Address for correspondence: Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou, MD, PhD, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, 200 South Manchester Avenue, Suite 400, Orange, CA 92868-3298. siou@ 123456hs.uci.edu
                Article
                S2666-3643(22)00091-1 100367
                10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100367
                9304608
                35875467
                30360c86-fb9c-400b-9bbc-6cd45e8d55f9
                © 2022 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 20 March 2022
                : 10 June 2022
                : 15 June 2022
                Categories
                Brief Report

                alectinib,atezolizumab,alk-positive,non–small cell lung cancer,phase 1b study

                Comments

                Comment on this article