There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
We seem able to define the biological foundations for our musicality within a clear
and unitary framework, yet music itself does not appear so clearly definable. Music
is different things and does different things in different cultures; the bundles of
elements and functions that are music for any given culture may overlap minimally
with those of another culture, even for those cultures where "music" constitutes a
discrete and identifiable category of human activity in its own right. The dynamics
of culture, of music as cultural praxis, are neither necessarily reducible, nor easily
relatable, to the dynamics of our biologies. Yet music appears to be a universal human
competence. Recent evolutionary theory, however, affords a means for exploring things
biological and cultural within a framework in which they are at least commensurable.
The adoption of this perspective shifts the focus of the search for the foundations
of music away from the mature and particular expression of music within a specific
culture or situation and on to the human capacity for musicality. This paper will
survey recent research that examines that capacity and its evolutionary origins in
the light of a definition of music that embraces music's multifariousness. It will
be suggested that music, like speech, is a product of both our biologies and our social
interactions; that music is a necessary and integral dimension of human development;
and that music may have played a central role in the evolution of the modern human
mind.