38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mesenteric approach during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Mesenteric approach is an artery‐first approach during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). In the present study, we evaluated clinical and oncological benefits of this procedure for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the pancreas head. Between 2000 and 2015, 237 consecutive PDAC patients underwent PD. Among them, 72 experienced the mesenteric approach (mesenteric group) and 165 the conventional approach (conventional group). A matched‐pairs group consisted of 116 patients (58 patients in each group) matched for age, gender, resectability status, and neoadjuvant therapy. Surgical and oncological outcomes were compared between the two groups in unmatched‐ and matched‐pair analyses. Intraoperative blood loss was lower in the mesenteric group than in the conventional group in both resectable PDAC (R‐PDAC) and borderline resectable PDAC (BR‐PDAC) on unmatched‐ and matched‐pairs analyses (R‐PDAC, unmatched: 312.5 vs 510 mL, P=.008; matched: 312.5 vs 501.5 mL, P=.023; BR‐PDAC, unmatched: 507.5 vs 935 mL, P<.001; matched: 507.5 vs 920 mL, P=.003). Negative surgical margins (R0) and overall survival (OS) rates in the mesenteric group were better in R‐PDAC patients (R0 rates, unmatched: 100% vs 87.7%, P=.044; matched: 100% vs 86.7%, P=.045; OS, unmatched: P=.008, matched: P=.021), although there were no significant differences in BR‐PDAC patients. Mesenteric approach might reduce blood loss by early ligation of the vessels to the pancreatic head. Furthermore, it might increase R0 rate, leading to improvement of survival for R‐PDAC patients. However, R0 and survival rates could not be improved only by the mesenteric approach for BR‐PDAC patients. Therefore, effective multidisciplinary treatment is essential to improve survival in BR‐PDAC patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer.

          Resection margin (RM) status in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma is assessed histologically, but pathological examination is not standardized. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of standardized pathological examination on the reporting of RM status. A standardized protocol (SP) for pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen examination, involving multicolour margin staining, axial slicing and extensive tissue sampling, was developed. R1 resection was defined as tumour within 1 mm of the RM. A prospective series reported according to this protocol (SP series, n = 54) was compared with a historical matched series in which a non-standardized protocol was used (NSP series, n = 48). Implementation of the SP resulted in a higher R1 rate overall, and for pancreatic (22 of 26 85 per cent) compared with ampullary (four of 15) and bile duct (six of 13) cancer. Sampling of the circumferential RM was more extensive in the SP series and correlated with RM status. RM involvement was often multifocal (14 of 32), affecting the posterior RM most frequently (21 of 32). Survival correlated with RM status for the entire SP series (P < 0.001), but not for the NSP series. There was a trend towards better median and actuarial 5-year survival after R0 resection in the SP pancreatic cancer subgroup. Standardized examination influences the reporting of RM status.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Isolated pancreatectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma using catheter bypass of the portal vein.

            We investigated perioperative complications and survival rate in 114 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent surgical resection between July, 1981 and March, 1992 with an antithrombogenic bypass catheter of the portal vein which we have developed. With this catheter, mesenteric venous blood can be bypassed to the systemic circulation or intrahepatic portal vein to prevent portal congestion or hepatic ischemia during portal obstruction or simultaneous obstruction of the hepatic artery. All the arteries supplying, and veins draining, the pancreas are dissected prior to its manipulation, following which isolated pancreatectomy accompanied by portal vein resection can be performed. Eighty patients (70%) also underwent isolated pancreatectomy. The perioperative death rate was 9.6%, and the main factor contributing to mortality with the bypass method was not portal vein resection, but various postoperative complications, such as insufficiency of the pancreatojejunostomy and thrombosis of the hepatic artery or superior mesenteric artery after resection and reconstruction. We conclude that aggressive surgery with the bypass method increases the operability of pancreatic cancer, although auxiliary therapies combined with radical surgery are necessary to improve the therapeutic outcome for this cancer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Indication for the use of an interposed graft during portal vein and/or superior mesenteric vein reconstruction in pancreatic resection based on perioperative outcomes.

              Combined portal vein and/or superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resection with pancreatic resection sometimes leads to prolonged survival for patients with pancreatic cancer. In this study, we evaluated perioperative outcomes of patients with PV/SMV reconstruction and considered indications for the use of a graft during this procedure.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                yamaue-h@wakayama-med.ac.jp
                Journal
                Ann Gastroenterol Surg
                Ann Gastroenterol Surg
                10.1002/(ISSN)2475-0328
                AGS3
                Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2475-0328
                07 June 2017
                September 2017
                : 1
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1002/ags3.2017.1.issue-3 )
                : 208-218
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Second Department of Surgery School of Medicine Wakayama Medical University Wakayama Japan
                [ 2 ] Clinical Study Support Center School of Medicine Wakayama Medical University Wakayama Japan
                [ 3 ] Department of Surgery Nagoya Central Hospital Nagoya Japan
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Hiroki Yamaue, Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.

                Email: yamaue-h@ 123456wakayama-med.ac.jp

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6982-3457
                Article
                AGS312013
                10.1002/ags3.12013
                5881370
                2e7fadc3-06b8-475c-98a7-10c1cd71c164
                © 2017 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 07 March 2017
                : 24 April 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 4, Pages: 11, Words: 7470
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                ags312013
                September 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.3.4 mode:remove_FC converted:03.04.2018

                borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (br‐pdac),mesenteric approach,pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (pdac),resectable pdac (r‐pdac)

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content410

                Cited by13

                Most referenced authors347