36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      ROSE: radiology, obstruction, symptoms and exposure – a Delphi consensus definition of the association of COPD and bronchiectasis by the EMBARC Airways Working Group

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The coexistence of COPD and bronchiectasis seems to be common and associated with a worse prognosis than for either disease individually. However, no definition of this association exists to guide researchers and clinicians.

          Methods

          We conducted a Delphi survey involving expert pulmonologists and radiologists from Europe, Turkey and Israel in order to define the “COPD– [bronchiectasis] BE association”.

          A panel of 16 experts from EMBARC selected 35 statements for the survey after reviewing scientific literature. Invited participants, selected on the basis of expertise, geographical and sex distribution, were asked to express agreement on the statements. Consensus was defined as a score of ≥6 points (scale 0 to 9) in ≥70% of answers across two scoring rounds.

          Results

          102 (72.3%) out of 141 invited experts participated in the first round. Their response rate in the second round was 81%. The final consensus definition of “COPD–BE association” was: “The coexistence of (1) specific radiological findings ( abnormal bronchial dilatation, airways visible within 1 cm of pleura and/or lack of tapering sign in ≥1 pulmonary segment and in >1 lobe) with (2) an obstructive pattern on spirometry ([forced expiratory volume in 1 s] FEV 1/[forced vital capacity] FVC <0.7), (3) at least two characteristic symptoms ( cough, expectoration, dyspnoea, fatigue, frequent infections) and (4) current or past exposure to smoke (10 pack-years) or other toxic agents (bi omass, etc.)”. These criteria form the acronym “ROSE” (Radiology, Obstruction, Symptoms, Exposure).

          Conclusions

          The Delphi process formulated a European consensus definition of “COPD–BE association”. We hope this definition will have broad applicability across clinical practice and research in the future.

          Abstract

          A group of experts from EMBARC has generated a consensus definition of COPD and bronchiectasis association based on the coexistence of radiological findings, bronchial obstruction, compatible symptoms and exposure to smoke or toxic agents (ROSE criteria) https://bit.ly/3g3cdld

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques

          Introduction The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) and Delphi Technique are consensus methods used in research that is directed at problem-solving, idea-generation, or determining priorities. While consensus methods are commonly used in health services literature, few studies in pharmacy practice use these methods. This paper provides an overview of the NGT and Delphi technique, including the steps involved and the types of research questions best suited to each method, with examples from the pharmacy literature. Methodology The NGT entails face-to-face discussion in small groups, and provides a prompt result for researchers. The classic NGT involves four key stages: silent generation, round robin, clarification and voting (ranking). Variations have occurred in relation to generating ideas, and how ‘consensus’ is obtained from participants. The Delphi technique uses a multistage self-completed questionnaire with individual feedback, to determine consensus from a larger group of ‘experts.’ Questionnaires have been mailed, or more recently, e-mailed to participants. When to use The NGT has been used to explore consumer and stakeholder views, while the Delphi technique is commonly used to develop guidelines with health professionals. Method choice is influenced by various factors, including the research question, the perception of consensus required, and associated practicalities such as time and geography. Limitations The NGT requires participants to personally attend a meeting. This may prove difficult to organise and geography may limit attendance. The Delphi technique can take weeks or months to conclude, especially if multiple rounds are required, and may be complex for lay people to complete.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            European Respiratory Society guidelines for the management of adult bronchiectasis.

            Bronchiectasis in adults is a chronic disorder associated with poor quality of life and frequent exacerbations in many patients. There have been no previous international guidelines.The European Respiratory Society guidelines for the management of adult bronchiectasis describe the appropriate investigation and treatment strategies determined by a systematic review of the literature.A multidisciplinary group representing respiratory medicine, microbiology, physiotherapy, thoracic surgery, primary care, methodology and patients considered the most relevant clinical questions (for both clinicians and patients) related to management of bronchiectasis. Nine key clinical questions were generated and a systematic review was conducted to identify published systematic reviews, randomised clinical trials and observational studies that answered these questions. We used the GRADE approach to define the quality of the evidence and the level of recommendations. The resulting guideline addresses the investigation of underlying causes of bronchiectasis, treatment of exacerbations, pathogen eradication, long term antibiotic treatment, anti-inflammatories, mucoactive drugs, bronchodilators, surgical treatment and respiratory physiotherapy.These recommendations can be used to benchmark quality of care for people with bronchiectasis across Europe and to improve outcomes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Consensus measurement in Delphi studies

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ERJ Open Res
                ERJ Open Res
                ERJOR
                erjor
                ERJ Open Research
                European Respiratory Society
                2312-0541
                October 2021
                22 November 2021
                : 7
                : 4
                : 00399-2021
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Dept of Medicine and Surgery, Respiratory Diseases, Università dell'Insubria, Varese-Como, Italy
                [2 ]Pneumology Dept, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Barcelona, Spain
                [3 ]CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Barcelona, Spain
                [4 ]Respiratory Dept, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
                [5 ]Pulmonology Institute and Cystic Fibrosis Center, Carmel Medical Center, and the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, the B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel
                [6 ]Dept of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Karolinska University Hospital and Dept of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
                [7 ]5th Respiratory Department, “SOTIRIA” Hospital for Chest diseases, Athens, Greece
                [8 ]Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
                [9 ]UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK
                [10 ]Dept of Surgery, Medicine, Molecular Biology and Critical Care, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
                [11 ]Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
                [12 ]Dept of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
                [13 ]Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, German Center for Lung Research, Breath, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
                [14 ]IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
                [15 ]School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Eva Polverino ( eva.polverino@ 123456vhir.org )
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9850-9520
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0432-3398
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7246-6040
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1831-9672
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0090-4531
                Article
                00399-2021
                10.1183/23120541.00399-2021
                8607072
                34820447
                2e0b993c-b979-4d2d-b35f-12177c1bda5c
                Copyright ©The authors 2021

                This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org

                History
                : 16 June 2021
                : 05 August 2021
                Categories
                Original research articles
                COPD and bronchiectasis
                1
                3

                Comments

                Comment on this article