2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Detailed description of Division I ice hockey concussions: Findings from the NCAA and Department of Defense CARE Consortium

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • Previous concussion was associated with 2 times increased odds of incident concussion, while wearing a mouthguard was protective against incident concussion, reducing odds by 57%.

          • Overall, concussion mechanisms did not significantly differ between sexes.

          • Females took significantly longer to reach asymptomatic and return-to-play clearance. Within the first 2 weeks post-concussion, 86.11% of males reached asymptomatic, while only 45.50% of females reached the same phase of recovery.

          • Most males (91.67%) were cleared for return-to-play within 3 weeks of their concussion, compared to less than one-half (45.50%) of females.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Since concussion is the most common injury in ice hockey, the objective of the current study was to elucidate risk factors, specific mechanisms, and clinical presentations of concussion in men's and women's ice hockey.

          Methods

          Ice hockey players from 5 institutions participating in the Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education Consortium were eligible for the current study. Participants who sustained a concussion outside of this sport were excluded. There were 332 (250 males, 82 females) athletes who participated in ice hockey, and 47 (36 males, 11 females) who sustained a concussion.

          Results

          Previous concussion (odds ratio (OR) = 2.00; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.02‒3.91) was associated with increased incident concussion odds, while wearing a mouthguard was protective against incident concussion (OR = 0.43; 95%CI: 0.22‒0.85). Overall, concussion mechanisms did not significantly differ between sexes. There were specific differences in how concussions presented clinically across male and female ice hockey players, however. Females (9.09%) were less likely than males (41.67%) to have a delayed symptom onset ( p = 0.045). Additionally, females took significantly longer to reach asymptomatic ( p = 0.015) and return-to-play clearance ( p = 0.005). Within the first 2 weeks post-concussion, 86.11% of males reached asymptomatic, while only 45.50% of females reached the same phase of recovery. Most males (91.67%) were cleared for return to play within 3 weeks of their concussion, compared to less than half (45.50%) of females.

          Conclusion

          The current study proposes possible risk factors, mechanisms, and clinical profiles to be validated in future concussions studies with larger female sample sizes. Understanding specific risk factors, concussion mechanisms, and clinical profiles of concussion in collegiate ice hockey may generate ideas for future concussion prevention or intervention studies.

          Graphical Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression.

          The rule of thumb that logistic and Cox models should be used with a minimum of 10 outcome events per predictor variable (EPV), based on two simulation studies, may be too conservative. The authors conducted a large simulation study of other influences on confidence interval coverage, type I error, relative bias, and other model performance measures. They found a range of circumstances in which coverage and bias were within acceptable levels despite less than 10 EPV, as well as other factors that were as influential as or more influential than EPV. They conclude that this rule can be relaxed, in particular for sensitivity analyses undertaken to demonstrate adequate control of confounding.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis.

            We performed a Monte Carlo study to evaluate the effect of the number of events per variable (EPV) analyzed in logistic regression analysis. The simulations were based on data from a cardiac trial of 673 patients in which 252 deaths occurred and seven variables were cogent predictors of mortality; the number of events per predictive variable was (252/7 =) 36 for the full sample. For the simulations, at values of EPV = 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25, we randomly generated 500 samples of the 673 patients, chosen with replacement, according to a logistic model derived from the full sample. Simulation results for the regression coefficients for each variable in each group of 500 samples were compared for bias, precision, and significance testing against the results of the model fitted to the original sample. For EPV values of 10 or greater, no major problems occurred. For EPV values less than 10, however, the regression coefficients were biased in both positive and negative directions; the large sample variance estimates from the logistic model both overestimated and underestimated the sample variance of the regression coefficients; the 90% confidence limits about the estimated values did not have proper coverage; the Wald statistic was conservative under the null hypothesis; and paradoxical associations (significance in the wrong direction) were increased. Although other factors (such as the total number of events, or sample size) may influence the validity of the logistic model, our findings indicate that low EPV can lead to major problems.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Reliability and validity of a brief measure of sensation seeking

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Sport Health Sci
                J Sport Health Sci
                Journal of Sport and Health Science
                Shanghai University of Sport
                2095-2546
                2213-2961
                14 January 2021
                March 2021
                14 January 2021
                : 10
                : 2
                : 162-171
                Affiliations
                [a ]Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536-0230, USA
                [b ]College of Medicine School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
                [c ]Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA
                [d ]University Health Services, Princeton University, McCosh Health Center, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
                [e ]Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705-2281, USA
                [f ]Keller Army Hospital, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY 10996, USA
                [g ]10th Medical Group, United States Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, CO 80840-4000, USA
                [h ]Sports Medicine, Athletic Department, United States Air Force Academy, U.S. Air Force Academy, CO 80840-9500, USA
                [i ]Novant Health, Charlotte Independence Soccer Club, Cornelius, NC 28031, USA
                [j ]Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
                [k ]Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
                [l ]Michigan Concussion Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
                [m ]Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. kloc223@ 123456uky.edu
                Article
                S2095-2546(21)00004-1
                10.1016/j.jshs.2021.01.004
                7987562
                33453430
                2ce065fa-97f3-4955-8a10-7f87d503962b
                © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Shanghai University of Sport.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 10 August 2020
                : 25 November 2020
                : 29 December 2020
                Categories
                Original Article

                concussion risk,injury mechanism,recovery
                concussion risk, injury mechanism, recovery

                Comments

                Comment on this article