48
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prognosis in patients with recent onset low back pain in Australian primary care: inception cohort study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective To estimate the one year prognosis and identify prognostic factors in cases of recent onset low back pain managed in primary care.

          Design Cohort study with one year follow-up.

          Setting Primary care clinics in Sydney, Australia.

          Participants An inception cohort of 973 consecutive primary care patients (mean age 43.3, 54.8% men) with non-specific low back pain of less than two weeks’ duration recruited from the clinics of 170 general practitioners, physiotherapists, and chiropractors.

          Main outcome measures Participants completed a baseline questionnaire and were contacted six weeks, three months, and 12 months after the initial consultation. Recovery was assessed in terms of return to work, return to function, and resolution of pain. The association between potential prognostic factors and time to recovery was modelled with Cox regression.

          Results The follow-up rate over the 12 months was more than 97%. Half of those who reduced their work status at baseline had returned to previous work status within 14 days (95% confidence interval 11 to 17 days) and 83% had returned to previous work status by three months. Disability (median recovery time 31 days, 25 to 37 days) and pain (median 58 days, 52 to 63 days) took much longer to resolve. Only 72% of participants had completely recovered 12 months after the baseline consultation. Older age, compensation cases, higher pain intensity, longer duration of low back pain before consultation, more days of reduced activity because of lower back pain before consultation, feelings of depression, and a perceived risk of persistence were each associated with a longer time to recovery.

          Conclusions In this cohort of patients with acute low back pain in primary care, prognosis was not as favourable as claimed in clinical practice guidelines. Recovery was slow for most patients. Nearly a third of patients did not recover from the presenting episode within a year.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain.

          A systematic review of prospective cohort studies in low back pain. To evaluate the evidence implicating psychological factors in the development of chronicity in low back pain. The biopsychosocial model is gaining acceptance in low back pain, and has provided a basis for screening measurements, guidelines and interventions; however, to date, the unique contribution of psychological factors in the transition from an acute presentation to chronicity has not been rigorously assessed. A systematic literature search was followed by the application of three sets of criteria to each study: methodologic quality, quality of measurement of psychological factors, and quality of statistical analysis. Two reviewers blindly coded each study, followed by independent assessment by a statistician. Studies were divided into three environments: primary care settings, pain clinics, and workplace. Twenty-five publications (18 cohorts) included psychological factors at baseline. Six of these met acceptability criteria for methodology, psychological measurement, and statistical analysis. Increased risk of chronicity (persisting symptoms and/or disability) from psychological distress/depressive mood and, to a lesser extent, somatization emerged as the main findings. Acceptable evidence generally was not found for other psychological factors, although weak support emerged for the role of catastrophizing as a coping strategy. Psychological factors (notably distress, depressive mood, and somatization) are implicated in the transition to chronic low back pain. The development and testing of clinical interventions specifically targeting these factors is indicated. In view of the importance attributed to other psychological factors (particularly coping strategies and fear avoidance) there is a need to clarify their role in back-related disability through rigorous prospective studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis.

              To describe the course of acute low back pain and sciatica and to identify clinically important prognostic factors for these conditions. Systematic review. Searches of Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and Science Citation Index and iterative searches of bibliographies. Pain, disability, and return to work. 15 studies of variable methodological quality were included. Rapid improvements in pain (mean reduction 58% of initial scores), disability (58%), and return to work (82% of those initially off work) occurred in one month. Further improvement was apparent until about three months. Thereafter levels for pain, disability, and return to work remained almost constant. 73% of patients had at least one recurrence within 12 months. People with acute low back pain and associated disability usually improve rapidly within weeks. None the less, pain and disability are typically ongoing, and recurrences are common.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: postdoctoral fellow
                Role: director of division
                Role: professor
                Role: associate professor
                Role: professor
                Role: rheumatologist
                Role: rheumatologist
                Role: research officer
                Role: research manager
                Journal
                BMJ
                bmj
                BMJ : British Medical Journal
                BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
                0959-8138
                1468-5833
                19 July 2008
                : 337
                : 7662
                : 154-157
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Musculoskeletal Division, The George Institute for International Health, Sydney, Australia
                [2 ]Back Pain Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney
                [3 ]School of Public Health, University of Sydney
                [4 ]Department of Rheumatology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: C G Maher, PO Box M201, Camperdown NSW 2050, Australia cmaher@ 123456george.org.au
                Article
                henn538827
                10.1136/bmj.a171
                2483884
                18614473
                2ca4964d-6907-4902-a9d5-b9400704f690
                © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2008
                History
                : 25 April 2008
                Categories
                Research

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article