0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Current topics in radiotherapy for genitourinary cancers: Consensus statements of the Genitourinary Radiation Oncologists of Canada

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The biennial meeting of the Genitourinary Radiation Oncologists of Canada (GUROC) took place November 22–23, 2019. A consensus-building session was held during the meeting addressing topics of emerging interest or controversy in the management of genitourinary malignancies.

          Methods

          Draft statements were debated among all meeting attendees in an open forum with anonymous live voting. Statements for which there was at least 75% agreement among attendees were adopted as GUROC consensus.

          Results

          Four evidence-based consensus statements were developed. First, the use of prostate radiotherapy is recommended in the setting of de novo low-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer to improve overall survival. Second, the support of ongoing randomized trials evaluating metastasis-directed ablative local therapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer is recommended; where such trials are available, off-trial use of oligometastasis-directed ablative radiotherapy at this time is strongly discouraged. Third, routine use of prostate-rectal hydrogel spacer devices in patients with localized prostate cancer planned to receive external beam radiotherapy is not recommended; instead, selective use in patients at highest risk of rectal toxicity may be considered. Finally, multidisciplinary consultation is recommended for all patients with newly diagnosed localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

          Conclusions

          The GUROC consensus statements provide practical guidance to clinicians in areas of current controversy in the management of prostate and bladder cancer, and it is hoped that their implementation will contribute to improved outcomes in real-world practice and greater support of clinical trials.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Can Urol Assoc J
          Can Urol Assoc J
          CUAJ
          Canadian Urological Association Journal
          Canadian Medical Association
          1911-6470
          1920-1214
          November 2020
          16 July 2020
          : 14
          : 11
          : E588-E593
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Radiation Medicine Program, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
          [2 ]Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
          [3 ]Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
          [4 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
          [5 ]Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
          [6 ]Département de radio-oncologie, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
          [7 ]Radiation Oncology Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
          [8 ]Division of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
          [9 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
          [10 ]Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
          [11 ]Division of Radiation Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
          Author notes
          Correspondence: Dr. Scott C. Morgan, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada; smorgan@ 123456toh.ca
          Article
          PMC7673835 PMC7673835 7673835 cuaj-11-e588
          10.5489/cuaj.6649
          7673835
          33079647
          2c7bbbf4-be5e-4766-9975-b933bfb2a76f
          Copyright: © 2020 Canadian Urological Association or its licensors
          History
          Categories
          Review

          Comments

          Comment on this article