2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Immunotherapy in Small Cell Lung Cancer

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Simple Summary

          Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for about 15% of lung cancers and it has limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. There has been no real progress for over 30 years in the treatment of this aggressive tumor type and platinum based chemotherapy represented the cornerstone of therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are the first agents in the last decades to determine an improvement in outcomes of patients with extensive stage (ES) SCLC patients. In the IMpower 133 and CASPIAN studies, the addition of atezolizumab or durvalumab, respectively, to first-line chemotherapy produced a significant improvement in overall survival with an acceptable safety profile in previously untreated patients with ES-SCLC, leading to a new standard of care. This review summarizes the main results observed with checkpoint inhibitors in SCLC, discussing the critical issues related to the use of novel checkpoint inhibitors and the future research with immunotherapy agents in SCLC.

          Abstract

          Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive tumor type with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. Chemotherapy regimens containing platinum represent the cornerstone of treatment for patients with extensive disease, but there has been no real progress for 30 years. The evidence that SCLC is characterized by a high mutational burden led to the development of immune-checkpoint inhibitors as single agents or in combination with chemotherapy. Randomized phase III trials demonstrated that the combination of atezolizumab (IMpower-133) or durvalumab (CASPIAN) with platinum-etoposide chemotherapy improved overall survival of patients with extensive disease. Instead, the KEYNOTE-604 study demonstrated that the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy failed to significantly improve overall survival, but it prolonged progression-free survival. The safety profile of these combinations was similar with the known safety profiles of all single agents and no new adverse events were observed. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab single agents showed anti-tumor activity and acceptable safety profile in Checkmate 032 and KEYNOTE 028/158 trials, respectively, in patients with SCLC after platinum-based therapy and at least one prior line of therapy. Future challenges are the identification predictive biomarkers of response to immunotherapy in SCLC and the definition of the role of immunotherapy in patients with limited stage SCLC, in combination with radiotherapy or with other biological agents.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy.

          Among the most promising approaches to activating therapeutic antitumour immunity is the blockade of immune checkpoints. Immune checkpoints refer to a plethora of inhibitory pathways hardwired into the immune system that are crucial for maintaining self-tolerance and modulating the duration and amplitude of physiological immune responses in peripheral tissues in order to minimize collateral tissue damage. It is now clear that tumours co-opt certain immune-checkpoint pathways as a major mechanism of immune resistance, particularly against T cells that are specific for tumour antigens. Because many of the immune checkpoints are initiated by ligand-receptor interactions, they can be readily blocked by antibodies or modulated by recombinant forms of ligands or receptors. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) antibodies were the first of this class of immunotherapeutics to achieve US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Preliminary clinical findings with blockers of additional immune-checkpoint proteins, such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1), indicate broad and diverse opportunities to enhance antitumour immunity with the potential to produce durable clinical responses.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer.

            Immune checkpoint inhibitors, which unleash a patient's own T cells to kill tumors, are revolutionizing cancer treatment. To unravel the genomic determinants of response to this therapy, we used whole-exome sequencing of non-small cell lung cancers treated with pembrolizumab, an antibody targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1). In two independent cohorts, higher nonsynonymous mutation burden in tumors was associated with improved objective response, durable clinical benefit, and progression-free survival. Efficacy also correlated with the molecular smoking signature, higher neoantigen burden, and DNA repair pathway mutations; each factor was also associated with mutation burden. In one responder, neoantigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses paralleled tumor regression, suggesting that anti-PD-1 therapy enhances neoantigen-specific T cell reactivity. Our results suggest that the genomic landscape of lung cancers shapes response to anti-PD-1 therapy. Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              First-Line Atezolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

              Enhancing tumor-specific T-cell immunity by inhibiting programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-programmed death 1 (PD-1) signaling has shown promise in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Combining checkpoint inhibition with cytotoxic chemotherapy may have a synergistic effect and improve efficacy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cancers (Basel)
                Cancers (Basel)
                cancers
                Cancers
                MDPI
                2072-6694
                04 September 2020
                September 2020
                : 12
                : 9
                : 2522
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Thoracic Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS “Fondazione G. Pascale”, 80131 Napoli, Italy; espositogiovanna87@ 123456gmail.com (G.E.); giuliano.palumbo@ 123456yahoo.it (G.P.); anna.manzo@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it (A.M.); a.montanino@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it (A.M.); v.sforza@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it (V.S.); r.costanzo@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it (R.C.); c.sandomenico@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it (C.S.)
                [2 ]Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliera Pugliese—Ciaccio, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; guidocarillio@ 123456gmail.com
                [3 ]Thoracic Surgery, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, “Fondazione G.Pascale”—IRCCS, 80131 Napoli, Italy; c.lamanna@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it (C.L.M.); n.martucci@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it (N.M.); a.larocca@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it (A.L.R.); g.deluca@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it (G.D.L.)
                [4 ]Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, “Fondazione G.Pascale”—IRCCS, 80131 Napoli, Italy; m.piccirillo@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it
                [5 ]Pathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, “Fondazione G.Pascale”—IRCCS, 80131 Napoli, Italy; r.dececio@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it
                [6 ]Scientific Directorate, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, “Fondazione G. Pascale”—IRCCS, 80131 Naples, Italy; g.botti@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it
                [7 ]Radiotherapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, “Fondazione G. Pascale”—IRCCS, 80131 Naples, Italy; g.totaro@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it (G.T.); p.muto@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it (P.M.)
                [8 ]Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, “Fondazione G.Pascale”—IRCCS, 80131 Napoli, Italy; c.picone@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it
                [9 ]Cellular Biology and Biotherapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, “Fondazione G.Pascale”—IRCCS, 80131 Napoli, Italy; n.normanno@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: a.morabito@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it ; Tel.: +39-08-15903522; Fax: +39-08-17702938
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7652-9432
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7158-2605
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1319-9608
                Article
                cancers-12-02522
                10.3390/cancers12092522
                7565004
                32899891
                2be37d93-bc50-4418-8fbd-03292cd5e0d2
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 06 July 2020
                : 03 September 2020
                Categories
                Review

                sclc,ipilimumab,tremelimumab,nivolumab,atezolizumab,pembrolizumab,durvalumab,pdl-1,tumour mutation burden

                Comments

                Comment on this article