6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2 after natural infection and/or different vaccination regimens

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The aim of the study was to evaluate the humoral and cellular immunity after SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or vaccination according to the type of vaccine, number of doses and combination of vaccines.

          Methods

          Volunteer subjects were sampled between September 2021 and July 2022 in Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid (Spain). Participants had different immunological status against SARS-CoV-2: vaccinated and unvaccinated, with or without previous COVID-19 infection, including healthy and immunocompromised individuals. Determination of IgG against the spike protein S1 subunit receptor-binding domain (RBD) was performed by chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) using the Architect i10000sr platform (Abbott). The SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses were assessed by quantification of interferon gamma release using QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 assay (Qiagen).

          Results

          A total of 181 samples were collected, 170 were from vaccinated individuals and 11 from unvaccinated. Among the participants, 41 were aware of having previously been infected by SARS-CoV-2. Vaccinated people received one or two doses of the following vaccines against SARS-CoV-2: ChAdOx1-S (University of Oxford—AstraZeneca) (AZ) and/orBNT162b2 (Pfizer—BioNTech)(PZ). Subjects immunized with a third-booster dose received PZ or mRNA-1273 (Moderna—NIAID)(MD) vaccines. All vaccinees developed a positive humoral response (>7.1 BAU/ml), but the cellular response varied depending on the vaccination regimen. Only AZ/PZ combination and 3 doses of vaccination elicited a positive cellular response (median concentration of IFN- γ > 0.3 IU/ml). Regarding a two-dose vaccination regimen, AZ/PZ combination induced the highest humoral and cellular immunity. A booster with mRNA vaccine resulted in increases in median levels of IgG-Spike antibodies and IFN-γ as compared to those of two-dose of any vaccine. Humoral and cellular immunity levels were significantly higher in participants with previous infection compared to those without infection.

          Conclusion

          Heterologous vaccination (AZ/PZ) elicited the strongest immunity among the two-dose vaccination regimens. The immunity offered by the third-booster dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine depends not only on the type of vaccine administered but also on previous doses and prior infection. Previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 antigens by infection strongly affect immunity of vaccinated individuals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19

          The adaptive immune system is important for control of most viral infections. The three fundamental components of the adaptive immune system are B cells (the source of antibodies), CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells. The armamentarium of B cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells has differing roles in different viral infections, and in vaccines, and thus it is critical to directly study adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 to understand COVID-19. Knowledge is now available on relationships between antigen-specific immune responses and SARS-CoV-2 infection. While more studies are needed, a picture has begun to emerge that reveals that CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and neutralizing antibodies all contribute to control of SARS-CoV-2, in both non-hospitalized and hospitalized cases of COVID-19. The specific functions and kinetics of these adaptive immune responses are discussed, as well as their interplay with innate immunity and implications for COVID-19 vaccines and immune memory against re-infection.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Deep immune profiling of COVID-19 patients reveals distinct immunotypes with therapeutic implications

            COVID-19 is currently a global pandemic, but human immune responses to the virus remain poorly understood. We analyzed 125 COVID-19 patients, and compared recovered to healthy individuals using high dimensional cytometry. Integrated analysis of ~200 immune and ~50 clinical features revealed activation of T cell and B cell subsets in a proportion of patients. A subgroup of patients had T cell activation characteristic of acute viral infection and plasmablast responses reaching >30% of circulating B cells. However, another subgroup had lymphocyte activation comparable to uninfected subjects. Stable versus dynamic immunological signatures were identified and linked to trajectories of disease severity change. These analyses identified three “immunotypes” associated with poor clinical trajectories versus improving health. These immunotypes may have implications for the design of therapeutics and vaccines for COVID-19.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months

              Background BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine encoding a prefusion-stabilized, membrane-anchored severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) full-length spike protein. BNT162b2 is highly efficacious against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) and is currently approved, conditionally approved, or authorized for emergency use worldwide. At the time of initial authorization, data beyond 2 months after vaccination were unavailable. Methods In an ongoing, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, multinational, pivotal efficacy trial, we randomly assigned 44,165 participants 16 years of age or older and 2264 participants 12 to 15 years of age to receive two 30-μg doses, at 21 days apart, of BNT162b2 or placebo. The trial end points were vaccine efficacy against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and safety, which were both evaluated through 6 months after vaccination. Results BNT162b2 continued to be safe and have an acceptable adverse-event profile. Few participants had adverse events leading to withdrawal from the trial. Vaccine efficacy against Covid-19 was 91.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.0 to 93.2) through 6 months of follow-up among the participants without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection who could be evaluated. There was a gradual decline in vaccine efficacy. Vaccine efficacy of 86 to 100% was seen across countries and in populations with diverse ages, sexes, race or ethnic groups, and risk factors for Covid-19 among participants without evidence of previous infection with SARS-CoV-2. Vaccine efficacy against severe disease was 96.7% (95% CI, 80.3 to 99.9). In South Africa, where the SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern B.1.351 (or beta) was predominant, a vaccine efficacy of 100% (95% CI, 53.5 to 100) was observed. Conclusions Through 6 months of follow-up and despite a gradual decline in vaccine efficacy, BNT162b2 had a favorable safety profile and was highly efficacious in preventing Covid-19. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728 .)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/868621Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2627934Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Cell Infect Microbiol
                Front Cell Infect Microbiol
                Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.
                Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2235-2988
                20 March 2024
                2024
                : 14
                : 1370859
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Servicio de Microbiología Clínica, Instituto Medicina Laboratorio (IML), Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Hospital Clínico San Carlos , Madrid, Spain
                [2] 2Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense , Madrid, Spain
                [3] 3Sala de extracciones, IML, Hospital Clínico San Carlos , Madrid, Spain
                Author notes

                Edited by: Brendon P. Scicluna, University of Malta, Malta

                Reviewed by: Tatjana Pekmezovic, University of Belgrade, Serbia

                Ritthideach Yorsaeng, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand

                *Correspondence: Esther Ríos, erios02@ 123456ucm.es
                Article
                10.3389/fcimb.2024.1370859
                10987831
                38572317
                2b76849b-532d-4452-96cb-5b9aa2d06186
                Copyright © 2024 Culebras, Martínez, Novella, León, Marcos, Delgado-Iribarren and Ríos

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 15 January 2024
                : 01 March 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 35, Pages: 9, Words: 4598
                Funding
                The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
                Categories
                Cellular and Infection Microbiology
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Clinical Microbiology

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                sars-cov-2,vaccine regimens,cellular immunity,humoral immunity,astrazeneca,pfizer-biontech,moderna

                Comments

                Comment on this article