8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Advancing Cancer Research in Africa Through Early-Career Awards: The BIG Cat Initiative

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          PURPOSE

          The burden of cancer in Africa is growing rapidly, and increased cancer research on the continent is a critical component of an effective response. In 2010, the US National Cancer Institute, in partnership with the African Organization for Research and Training in Cancer, launched the Beginning Investigator Grant for Catalytic Research (BIG Cat) initiative to support cancer research projects conducted by early-career African investigators.

          METHODS

          To date, BIG Cat has provided 18 awards of up to $50,000 to support 2-year cancer research projects. In 2017, the National Cancer Institute evaluated BIG Cat’s early outcomes for cancer research and impacts on career development and local cancer research capacity. Data collection consisted of a review of project documentation and a survey fielded to the 12 investigators who had completed their BIG Cat awards.

          RESULTS

          BIG Cat–supported research projects have generated locally relevant findings that address a range of cancer sites and multiple areas of scientific interest. The 11 survey respondents produced 43 scholarly products (e.g., publications, presentations) about findings from their BIG Cat research. They reported increases in cancer research funding applications and awards after receipt of the BIG Cat award compared with before the award. They also reported increased resources for cancer research, participation in teaching and mentoring on cancer research, and supervision of cancer research staff. Investigators identified scientific mentoring as a key facilitator of the success of their BIG Cat projects and limited time and funding as key challenges.

          CONCLUSION

          Findings provide early evidence that BIG Cat advanced locally relevant cancer research and facilitated career advancement and development of local cancer research capacity. Findings have implications for the design of future related efforts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Building capacity for sustainable research programmes for cancer in Africa.

            Cancer research in Africa will have a pivotal role in cancer control planning in this continent. However, environments (such as those in academic or clinical settings) with limited research infrastructure (laboratories, biorespositories, databases) coupled with inadequate funding and other resources have hampered African scientists from carrying out rigorous research. In September 2012, over 100 scientists with expertise in cancer research in Africa met in London to discuss the challenges in performing high-quality research, and to formulate the next steps for building sustainable, comprehensive and multi-disciplinary programmes relevant to Africa. This was the first meeting among five major organizations: the African Organisation for Research and Training in Africa (AORTIC), the Africa Oxford Cancer Foundation (AfrOx), and the National Cancer Institutes (NCI) of Brazil, France and the USA. This article summarizes the discussions and recommendations of this meeting, including the next steps required to create sustainable and impactful research programmes that will enable evidenced-based cancer control approaches and planning at the local, regional and national levels.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pioneering the Transdisciplinary Team Science Approach: Lessons Learned from National Cancer Institute Grantees.

              The National Cancer Institute has been a leader in supporting transdisciplinary (TD) team science. From 2005-2010, the NCI supported Transdisciplinary Research on Energetic and Cancer I (TREC I), a center initiative fostering the TD integration of social, behavioral, and biological sciences to examine the relationships among obesity, nutrition, physical activity and cancer. In the final year of TREC I, we conducted qualitative in-depth-interviews with 31 participating investigators and trainees to learn more about their experiences with TD team science, including challenges, facilitating factors, strategies for success, and impacts. Five main challenges emerged: (1) limited published guidance for how to engage in TD team science, when TREC I was implemented; (2) conceptual and scientific challenges inherent to efforts to achieve TD integration; (3) discipline-based differences in values, terminology, methods, and work styles; (4) project management challenges involved in TD team science; and (5) traditional incentive and reward systems that do not recognize or reward TD team science. Four main facilitating factors and strategies for success emerged: (1) beneficial attitudes and beliefs about TD research and team science; (2) effective team processes; (3) brokering and bridge-building activities by individuals holding particular roles in a research center; and (4) funding initiative characteristics that support TD team science. Broad impacts of participating in TD team science in the context of TREC I included: (1) new positive attitudes about TD research and team science; (2) new boundary-crossing collaborations; (3) scientific advances related to research approaches, findings, and dissemination; (4) institutional culture change and resource creation in support of TD team science; and (5) career advancement. Funding agencies, academic institutions, and scholarly journals can help to foster TD team science through funding opportunities, institutional policies on extra-departmental and cross-school collaboration, promotion and tenure policies, and publishing opportunities for TD research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Glob Oncol
                J Glob Oncol
                jgo
                jgo
                JGO
                Journal of Global Oncology
                American Society of Clinical Oncology
                2378-9506
                2019
                22 April 2019
                : 5
                : JGO.18.00223
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
                [ 2 ]National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
                [ 3 ]African Organization for Research and Training in Cancer, New York, NY
                [ 4 ]Capacity Building for Innovation and Transformation, Potomac, MD
                [ 5 ]National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD
                Author notes
                Amanda L. Vogel, PhD, MPH, Clinical Monitoring Research Program Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Room 3W-264, Rockville, MD 20850; Twitter: @NCIGlobalHealth; e-mail: vogelal@ 123456mail.nih.gov .
                Article
                1800223
                10.1200/JGO.18.00223
                6528731
                31009270
                2b3baaff-c334-4953-b772-74c4b150d9c5
                © 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

                Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 19 February 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 14, Pages: 8
                Categories
                , Cancer Prevention and Control
                Original Report
                Custom metadata
                v1

                Comments

                Comment on this article