2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Fair Sampling Error Analysis on NISQ Devices

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We study the status of fair sampling on Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, in particular the IBM Q family of backends. Using the recently introduced Grover Mixer-QAOA algorithm for discrete optimization, we generate fair sampling circuits to solve six problems of varying difficulty, each with several optimal solutions, which we then run on twenty backends across the IBM Q system. For a given circuit evaluated on a specific set of qubits, we evaluate: how frequently the qubits return an optimal solution to the problem, the fairness with which the qubits sample from all optimal solutions, and the reported hardware error rate of the qubits. To quantify fairness, we define a novel metric based on Pearson’s χ 2 test. We find that fairness is relatively high for circuits with small and large error rates, but drops for circuits with medium error rates. This indicates that structured errors dominate in this regime, while unstructured errors, which are random and thus inherently fair, dominate in noisier qubits and longer circuits. Our results show that fairness can be a powerful tool for understanding the intricate web of errors affecting current NISQ hardware.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              From the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm to a Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz

              The next few years will be exciting as prototype universal quantum processors emerge, enabling the implementation of a wider variety of algorithms. Of particular interest are quantum heuristics, which require experimentation on quantum hardware for their evaluation and which have the potential to significantly expand the breadth of applications for which quantum computers have an established advantage. A leading candidate is Farhi et al.’s quantum approximate optimization algorithm, which alternates between applying a cost function based Hamiltonian and a mixing Hamiltonian. Here, we extend this framework to allow alternation between more general families of operators. The essence of this extension, the quantum alternating operator ansatz, is the consideration of general parameterized families of unitaries rather than only those corresponding to the time evolution under a fixed local Hamiltonian for a time specified by the parameter. This ansatz supports the representation of a larger, and potentially more useful, set of states than the original formulation, with potential long-term impact on a broad array of application areas. For cases that call for mixing only within a desired subspace, refocusing on unitaries rather than Hamiltonians enables more efficiently implementable mixers than was possible in the original framework. Such mixers are particularly useful for optimization problems with hard constraints that must always be satisfied, defining a feasible subspace, and soft constraints whose violation we wish to minimize. More efficient implementation enables earlier experimental exploration of an alternating operator approach, in the spirit of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm, to a wide variety of approximate optimization, exact optimization, and sampling problems. In addition to introducing the quantum alternating operator ansatz, we lay out design criteria for mixing operators, detail mappings for eight problems, and provide a compendium with brief descriptions of mappings for a diverse array of problems.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing
                ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing
                Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
                2643-6809
                2643-6817
                June 30 2022
                June 30 2022
                : 3
                : 2
                : 1-23
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Information Sciences (CCS-3) and Computational Earth Sciences (EES-16), Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
                [2 ]Information Sciences (CCS-3), Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
                [3 ]Computational Earth Sciences (EES-16), Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
                Article
                10.1145/3510857
                2b0d2c05-0f13-4899-a7aa-d75807ad7c37
                © 2022
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article